So because health care is used to keep people alive, it's right to be treated like big business? I think you should say it shouldn't be business for that exact reason.
So because health care is used to keep people alive, it's right to be treated like big business? I think you should say it shouldn't be business for that exact reason.
Reality is telling a whole other story than the zealots.
Of course it is Salon -- just one outlet that provides an overview refuting wing nut hyperbole and demagoguery
.................
If you’ve been keeping score at home, you’ll have noticed that not one but two states, including a red state with a paleoconservative governor, have in the past several days exonerated Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing in the so-called secret-video sting that has conservatives calling on Congress to defund the non-profit
http://www.salon.com/2015/08/03/wing...hoax_revealed/
another Left Wing Blog weighs in
/////
http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/27/...ood/#pq=eOQVIR
When I finally got through the transcripts of the first video, I found the whole thing was a let-down. The case wasn’t about what it seemed to be about based on the selected excerpts we had been offered. I was expecting a smoking gun, unequivocal proof, of two big things: that Planned Parenthood was selling fetal organs for profit, and that it was harvesting organs from late-term abortions. Instead, I found that the cases being discussed were mostly in the first trimester, and the quote about clinics wanting to “better than break even” was surrounded by at least eight flat statements (including the very next sentence) that Planned Parenthood was not looking to make a profit and didn’t regard this as a revenue stream.
//////////////
once again -- y'all need to start reading
"... wasn’t about what it seemed to be about..."
When it comes to RW Outrage, where have we heard that before
Last edited by 57Brave; 08-03-2015 at 02:02 PM.
Something something old dog new tricks.
why don't you just admit your take on the story was wrong and we can all move on. Because teh drip drip drip must be making you edgy
And the only claim I'd advanced in this thread, until your call-out, was that a very large component of the furor surrounding this story—at least from what I've read and heard—ultimately arrives back to that message, and is charged with naked vitriol regarding Planned Parenthood qua total institution. This is opposed to outrage purely at the facts of the scandal (and the attendant calls for specific and acute reforms), which one might expect if the concerns are really monetary (as [MENTION=266]Hawk[/MENTION] suggests) or consent-based (as you suggest).Originally Posted by weso1
While I'm somewhat skeptical of both assumptions, I find the latter (re consent) much more tenable, as I think people who wouldn't otherwise object to some act often find it objectionable when it happens without their volition.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
zitothebrave (08-03-2015)
Lol, because you haven't yet given me the simple pleasure of even trying to prove my take was 'wrong' ... just links to Salon. Tsk tsk.
A little friendly tip ? It really makes no difference which source ou go to. Whether left wing or right wing etc. I generally try reading news sources that have a track record of getting the story right. Once I have the story -- you know-- right----- then I can make up my mind on policies etc etc.
You've given me your reading list -- but, how / do you still get so many stories wrong ?
Make up your mind before reading ? Lemming -- I dont know
You have asserted since the first page on this thread in particular that PPH was selling fetal parts for profit.
That is not what happened. Or ever happened or is going to happen.
And there are reputable sources no less than the an investigation prompted by "paleoconservative Governor.. " to the blog the Federalist.
Hardly "fellow travellers.
Perhaps a little less zealotry and a little more patience on your part.
Because you know unless you own up I am going to lecture you everyday Sav keeps this forum alive until you admit you are wrong.
Side note, not holding my breath
Salon writer Bob Cesna boiled it down to this :
"Objective reality includes the following facts:
• Planned Parenthood is not selling fetus parts for profit or otherwise.
• Only three percent of Planned Parenthood’s activities involve abortions.
• Per the Hyde Amendment, no federal funds can be used for abortions. And there’s no evidence that Planned Parenthood has done so.
• Consequently, de-funding Planned Parenthood would put into jeopardy its ability to save lives and, germane to this issue, prevent abortions. The Washington Post editorial board concluded:
"
//////
Right Wing Spokesperson explains the Outrage
There was a link of Sarah Palin explaining the RW thoughts on this matter. But, in this case it was redundant.
So I took it down
Last edited by 57Brave; 08-03-2015 at 03:49 PM.
I just don't think the furor over this issue came from the pro life folk. I struggle to understand why they've failed to gain a foot hold until now.
I think there are a group of folks who are sitting back thinking, ok well you can abort these fetuses as long as you do it in a humane way and with respect to the fetus and the mother. I think that trust was broken. What does it mean for humanity going forward?
thank you weso1!
What anything always means for humanity: That we'll have to do better.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
Well, I would say a better future from this "barbism" honestly
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
As someone pointed out, if you want abortions to increase, go ahead and defund Planned Parenthood and cut off birth control to millions of people.
Black lives matter... unless you're talking to planned parenthood, who kill more black lives than anyone in the world.
BedellBrave (08-05-2015)
Perhaps better access to birth control and a strong focus on education would help.
socialism!!!
And it's a stupid thing to say, anyway, considering the massive differences. but false equivalency has never stopped you before i suppose.
goldfly (08-04-2015)
That was Sarah Palin's point on the link I took down. Because well, I'd get ripped for posting Sarah.
Why not credit for this profound notion ?
Last edited by 57Brave; 08-04-2015 at 12:09 PM.
I'm all about birth control. I'm not all about forcing people to pay for others.
That's just a difference between you and me. You want to rob people - I don't. I believe in freedom, you don't. I believe in personal responsibility, you believe in government hand-holding.
nailed it! **** freedom!
why am i paying for a fire department?! i've never used it!
i think poor people get robbed plenty. CEOs making $35MM on the backs of their workers is robbery. And you support it. therefore, you support robbing people.
better to make birth control more affordable than to have poor people give birth to kids that will have to be taken care of somehow.
just gotta find them bootstraps! like your friend who was bitching about her loans and health care. did she find her bootstraps and pull them up? she's not trying hard enough. tell her to try harder.
Well, for one - you're not paying for a federal fire department.
For 2, yet another dumb example. The government isn't forcing anyone to work for a corporation. That individual chooses to. And how is someone getting robbed from a corporation, if that corporation is actually paying them? Your hatred for corporations is hilarious. Who do you work for? Unless you started your own business, perhaps you should be thankful that someone else did and is paying you to help him/her grow it.
CEOs make money that they frankly probably deserve when it comes to the market valuations. Similar to professional athletes and movie stars. The top talen gets paid the most - and the top talent usually makes key decisions that can earn or cost a company millions or billions of dollars.
But once again, you do hate freedom as you apparently want to cap what someone can earn. Pretty sad
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote