No one wants to address Mrs. Beetlejuice screaming to crowds to burn down the SC, and to F Clarence Thomas?
I didn't think so.
No one wants to address Mrs. Beetlejuice screaming to crowds to burn down the SC, and to F Clarence Thomas?
I didn't think so.
Ivermectin Man
acesfull86 (06-29-2022)
The left is going to be looking around after Nov 22 and wonder what the hell happened.
We have been telling you that you were crazy for a LONG time.
Natural Immunity Croc
Republicans need to grow a ****ing spine or else be shown the door.
Natural Immunity Croc
DESPERATION.
They know he is coming back and they know all of their lies will be revealed. Term 2 {3} is going to be lit.
Natural Immunity Croc
Its all so wonderful
Natural Immunity Croc
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
I agree with this. The biggest problem I have with the recent “developments” is that it really doesn’t matter much. I don’t doubt for even a nanosecond that Trump was content to let the rioters do whatever. I’ve thought that from the beginning, because Trump is a narcissistic asshole. Nothing in this “bombshell” would be even remotely surprising to me, yet I still don’t see the point of rehashing all of this. If Trump, his team or his congressional supporters were materially involved, it’d be almost impossible to prove unless they can prove both that they helped organize the rally AND that the rally was a specific front to get supporters in the Capitol to disrupt the election process. Anything less than that is a waste of time, and that’s the almost certain conclusion. You’re not going to persuade anybody that doesn’t already dislike Trump that you should, and you don’t need to convince people that already disliked him. It’s somehow equally politically driven and politically ineffective in a way I can hardly comprehend.
acesfull86 (06-29-2022)
Difference is you have multiple agents willing to testify that what Hutchinson claimed she was told (about Trump lunging) never happened. There's also no reason for anyone to have made up that story and told Hutchinson. So if it didn't happen we can safely assume no one told Hutchinson did.
Ultimately it's not word vs word like your example here, there are multiple people willing to testify under oath that Hutchinson's story is incorrect.
There's the added fact that Hutchinson quite possibly has an interest in making her testimony as inflammatory as possible. If she's looking for a book deal, stories like that one would be eye catching to a publisher.
If she was testifying in a court of law and I was the defense, I'd almost want to let her testify and not object based on hearsay knowing I have two credible witnesses to refute her and in doing so destroy her credibility.
They won't be invited.
You are too stupid to vote, by the way
People have a desperate need to cling to fake news. It somehow has to be true because it puts Trump in a bad light.