Page 24 of 117 FirstFirst ... 1422232425263474 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 480 of 2323

Thread: Around the League: 2017 offseason edition / 2018 Season

  1. #461
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    $19M over 3 guaranteed years when they will be paying him $3M this year. That’s $16M over 2 years (one of which was going to be a cheaper arb year anyways) when Reed just signed for 2/17.

    I don’t see any surplus value added with his deal. They took on all the risk of guaranteeing 3 years for a BP arm in exchange for not having to give him 4 years.

    This is a move made by a team that thinks they are ready to compete.
    There is also an option which gives the team a chance to realize some additional value while limiting the downside. You may be right about the pricing for the third year being such that it does not increase expected surplus value. But at the same time it doesn't decrease it. It is pretty close to fair value. Where you have an increase is in the value derived from the option. We had a similar disagreement on the extension that the Brewers gave to Chase Anderson.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  2. #462
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    I'll give a highly stylized way of looking at these options to provide an idea of what they are worth. Suppose you have a player who has three expected outcomes worth 0 WAR, 2 WAR and 4 WAR, with equal probability. The expected value of having control of that player is 2 WAR. But if you have an option that allows you to eliminate the 0 WAR outcome, the expected value is 3 WAR. So that option increases the expected value by 1 WAR.

    Of course, this is a highly simplified way of looking at how an option might be valued. But it gets at some of the issues involved.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 01-13-2018 at 02:53 PM.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  3. #463
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,026
    Thanked in
    6,129 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    There is also an option which gives the team a chance to realize some additional value while limiting the downside. You may be right about the pricing for the third year being such that it does not increase expected surplus value. But at the same time it doesn't decrease it. It is pretty close to fair value. Where you have an increase is in the value derived from the option. We had a similar disagreement on the extension that the Brewers gave to Chase Anderson.
    All of Hand’s trade value was tied into his 2 cheap arb seasons, and the flexibility to cut him loose if he got hurt or became ineffective, as BP arms are liable to do.

    A large portion of that trade value is now gone, therefore his trade value decreased. It didn’t decrease a lot, but this was clearly not a move made to increase his trade value.

    It is a perfectly defensible move for a contender to make. Whether or not the Padres qualify is open for debate, but I don’t consider them particularly close to playoff contention.

    When the Padres are likely to contend they will have used up the most valuable years of Hand’s career on losing teams. That is not the way to maximize a player’s value.

    We saw the Braves do the same thing with Teheran. Some folks saw it happening as it happened, and the rest had to wait until now to realize why it was dumb to keep Teheran. In 2-3 years folks will similarly realize it was dumb for the Padres to keep and extend Hand.

  4. #464
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    All of Hand’s trade value was tied into his 2 cheap arb seasons, and the flexibility to cut him loose if he got hurt or became ineffective, as BP arms are liable to do.

    A large portion of that trade value is now gone, therefore his trade value decreased. It didn’t decrease a lot, but this was clearly not a move made to increase his trade value.

    It is a perfectly defensible move for a contender to make. Whether or not the Padres qualify is open for debate, but I don’t consider them particularly close to playoff contention.

    When the Padres are likely to contend they will have used up the most valuable years of Hand’s career on losing teams. That is not the way to maximize a player’s value.

    We saw the Braves do the same thing with Teheran. Some folks saw it happening as it happened, and the rest had to wait until now to realize why it was dumb to keep Teheran. In 2-3 years folks will similarly realize it was dumb for the Padres to keep and extend Hand.
    Giving up the optionality that is inherent in the arb process does cost some. Although I would still argue overall the deal increases the amount of expected value, in part because in my view the contract that Wade Davis signed might represent a better comparable than what Addison Reed signed for. Hand is projected to have a lower FIP than Davis.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  5. #465
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,026
    Thanked in
    6,129 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Giving up the optionality that is inherent in the arb process does cost some. Although I would still argue overall the deal increases the amount of expected value, in part because in my view the contract that Wade Davis signed might represent a better comparable than what Addison Reed signed for. Hand is projected to have a lower FIP than Davis.
    I think the point is the Padres signed Hand to the extension to contribute to the Padres, not to turn around and trade him. They are going to use at least his most valuable season (this upcoming season) on a losing team.

    After that point his trade value will be much lower than it is now.

    This is a poor use of resources, and it will be glaringly obvious in 2-3 years...just like it is now with Teheran.

  6. #466
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I think the point is the Padres signed Hand to the extension to contribute to the Padres, not to turn around and trade him. They are going to use at least his most valuable season (this upcoming season) on a losing team.

    After that point his trade value will be much lower than it is now.

    This is a poor use of resources, and it will be glaringly obvious in 2-3 years...just like it is now with Teheran.
    Nothing precludes them from trading Hand at the trade deadline.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  7. #467
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,026
    Thanked in
    6,129 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Nothing precludes them from trading Hand at the trade deadline.
    And you think he will be more valuable then with his new guaranteed contract and his most valuable regular season wasted than he was 24 hours ago?

    That’s silly to suggest.

  8. #468
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    And you think he will be more valuable then with his new guaranteed contract and his most valuable regular season wasted than he was 24 hours ago?

    That’s silly to suggest.
    To answer your question, yeah I think his value is added given the terms of the extension.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  9. #469
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,603
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,257
    Thanked in
    1,831 Posts
    Hand probably has more value now than he did.

    Under control for 3-4 more years at an affordable rate.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Heyward For This Useful Post:

    biggentleben (01-16-2018)

  11. #470
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    291
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    753
    Thanked in
    531 Posts
    Cole to Astros. Pirates only get Musgrove and Moran.

    Looks like the Astros have won the deal, but I'll wait until I see Enscheff's numbers before I solidify that statement.

  12. #471
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,450
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,928
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,638
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    My God. The Pirates are horribly stupid if this is true

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to UNCBlue012 For This Useful Post:

    Evad (01-13-2018)

  14. #472
    Playing the Waiting Game blueagleace1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    884
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WaitingFor2017 View Post
    Cole to Astros. Pirates only get Musgrove and Moran.

    Looks like the Astros have won the deal, but I'll wait until I see Enscheff's numbers before I solidify that statement.
    To me, this deal is dependent on Musgrove becoming a viable #2/#3 SP for Pitt to have gained fair value. Not high on Moran.
    "Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon"

  15. #473
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,450
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,928
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,638
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    sources: pirates will get 4 back in gerrit cole, tho musgrove and moran are expected to be the main pieces

  16. #474
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,541
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Once you get to the last 2 pre arb seasons there ain't that much expected surplus value left for guys like Cole and Ozuna. Although in both cases you need to factor in that they will get you a draft pick once they hit free agency.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  17. #475
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    I don't think it helps a ton, but I still think that Hand now has a little more trade value. I think teams nowadays would view his extra year(s) of control as an asset, rather than viewing it as a risk. It only takes him through his age 30 season with the option. I think its reasonable to assume that his production stays good enough to justify the dollar amount. This is just my perception of the extension plus the idea of trading him. If there is some data that suggests otherwise I am open to it.

    But ultimately I think Enscheff is mostly right in the sense that the Padres aren't planning on trading him. And him being a Padre for the next 4 years at that dollar amount is pretty silly, given where they are at.

  18. #476
    Arbitration Eligible NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,272
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,151
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    721
    Thanked in
    527 Posts
    Wonder how much it's for. Probably the minimum, but if they pay him anything over that, we save some money.

    The Mets and free agent first baseman Adrian Gonzalez have agreed upon a deal, pending a physical, according to USA Today's Bob Nightengale.

    No word on the terms, but it'll likely be a short deal with not a lot of money guaranteed. Gonzalez can afford to take less money for a better situation since he's still being paid $22.357 million by the Braves for 2018. For the Mets, the 35-year-old will be a mentor for first baseman of the future Dominic Smith.

  19. #477
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    101
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    137 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NYCBrave View Post
    Wonder how much it's for. Probably the minimum, but if they pay him anything over that, we save some money.

    The Mets and free agent first baseman Adrian Gonzalez have agreed upon a deal, pending a physical, according to USA Today's Bob Nightengale.

    No word on the terms, but it'll likely be a short deal with not a lot of money guaranteed. Gonzalez can afford to take less money for a better situation since he's still being paid $22.357 million by the Braves for 2018. For the Mets, the 35-year-old will be a mentor for first baseman of the future Dominic Smith.
    Had to be the friggin Mutts. We’re paying him over $20 million to play for the Mutts. Ugh!!

  20. #478
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,450
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,928
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,638
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts

  21. #479
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,311
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    180
    Thanked in
    136 Posts
    The Giants have taken a GIANT step forward this offseason if this trade goes through! Cutch and Longoria WOW!!!

  22. #480
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Orlando,FL
    Posts
    8,378
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,017
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,355
    Thanked in
    1,493 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay212033 View Post
    The Giants have taken a GIANT step forward this offseason if this trade goes through! Cutch and Longoria WOW!!!
    A few years ago that would have been huge, but both of them now are on the backside of their career. I expect them to be decent, but not what they used to be. And Cutch is a FA after the season right?
    Get off my lawn!

Similar Threads

  1. 2018 Offseason And Targets
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 11578
    Last Post: 03-26-2019, 07:29 PM
  2. Around the League: 2018/2019 Offseason
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2018, 05:44 PM
  3. Bold predictions: 2017 edition
    By UNCBlue012 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-17-2017, 08:43 AM
  4. 2018 Offseason
    By thewupk in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-28-2016, 07:38 PM
  5. Replies: 1410
    Last Post: 03-30-2014, 04:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •