Which state would win a war between all 50?

[BedellBrave]

Like I said. access to the Delaware River. NJ could cut off water supplies from one of it's biggest threats.

See you are thinking strategically and messing up my dissing of such an ugly state - the armpit of the Mid-Atlantic and NE.

[zitothebrave]

Delaware is a terrible state aside from Dogfish Head. I would pave over it in a heart beat so make travelling to Philly, NJ or Baltimore easier.

[Carp]

Rhode Island. Just because.

[50PoundHead]

There's a lot of factors. I think Texas would be rolled over pretty easily. It would be one of the tougher non-insane states. I think it's got to be Michigan or Minnesota though. Michigan has the most licensed hunters of any state in the US. Yes more than Texas. SO that's a lot of people who're used to hiding and shooting things from afar. Not to mention they have a whole city chock full of hiding spots since no ones in it.

Minnesota is a miserable place. I think invading Minnesota would be like a mini-march on Russia. Alaska aside from the getting there would be easy. Invade during the summer, almost all of the people like in a relatively small area. Hardest part about them and Hawaii is access. With Alaska you'd have to move from Washington, Oregon or California, or have Canada let you cross on land which I don't know if they would.

A state no one will probably mention is Pennsylvania. There are a few reasons why it would suck to be in a fight with pennsylvania. For starters, it's second or 3rd on registered hunters, they take that **** seriously there. Second it's a large state for the north east. YOu may be used to fast and furious fighting in NJ or Connecticut, then you move on to pennsylvania and it's a snooze fest.

You're on thin ice. Very thin ice.

Actually, we'd outlast all of you. And after we conquered the rest of the US through Scandinavian passive-aggressiveness, we'd force you all to have bike lanes everywhere!

[weso1]

Wherever the nukes are being stored. Those are the states that win.

[zitothebrave]

Wherever the nukes are being stored. Those are the states that win.

Lots of states have nukes so you lose.

[jpx7]

Lots of states have nukes so you lose.

When nuclear weapons come into play, we all lose.

[zitothebrave]

When nuclear weapons come into play, we all lose.

[AerchAngel]

When nuclear weapons come into play, we all lose.

Not alaska, they can shoot them down before they get there and Canada would not be happy with nukes flying over their territory, they might just decide to help Alaska.

[zitothebrave]

Not alaska, they can shoot them down before they get there and Canada would not be happy with nukes flying over their territory, they might just decide to help Alaska.

I don't think Canada's missile defense of having Ryan Dempster and Phillippe Aumont throwing snowballs will bring down an ICBM.

[AerchAngel]

I don't think Canada's missile defense of having Ryan Dempster and Phillippe Aumont throwing snowballs will bring down an ICBM.

BWHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!! nice one.

[nocalgirl10]

But then again in the end I'd bet my horse on the state with the most people. California, simply because you can argue anything else under the sun but the one with the most people to die sure has a hell of an advantage.

True...but none of us would even show up because we'd all either be stuck in traffic or just off doing something else we'd rather be doing. California would be one of the first states out.

[zitothebrave]

True...but none of us would even show up because we'd all either be stuck in traffic or just off doing something else we'd rather be doing. California would be one of the first states out.

I also have a sneaky suspicion Oregon or Washington may send enough Weed to California to make an alliance.