Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 62

Thread: Hypothetically speaking...

  1. #1
    Brian Jordan's New BFF JohnAdcox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,124
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13,990
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,045
    Thanked in
    459 Posts

    Hypothetically speaking...

    COULD the Braves compete in 2017? I mean, without, say, cataclysmic accidents in New York and Washington?

    Let's assume, for the moment, that it's true that the Braves MUST spend in 2017, both to put some shine on the new ballpark in the southern Chattanooga suburbs and to maintain the agreement with MLB that allowed the Liberty purchase.

    With that in mind, they blow open the bank vault doors and sign, say, Ramos and Cespedes, along with a bullpen piece or two.

    That means everything, everything else comes from within.

    So you'd plug two of the three glaring holes, leaving one. That leaves you with a lineup of (this is not an exact order, mind):

    RF: Mallex
    CF: Ender
    1B: Freeman
    LF: Cespedes
    C: Ramos
    3B: Adonis
    2B: Albies
    SS: Swanson
    P

    The pitching doesn't change, unless we add a bullpen piece.

    Short and second improve, or should soon.
    The bench improves, although Frenchy and Flowers aside, it lacks power.
    Obviously, L and C improve dramatically, despite obvious flaws.

    So. Is that enough? I'm not suggesting it's realistic, but I sincerely imagine there is pressure from Liberty to spend enough to put some butts in seats. I'm mostly thinking that the spend, despite the way it might cripple us long term, is something that might stop the brand value bleeding. That doesn't show on a spreadsheet, but C-level execs know it matters.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Still Playing the Waiting Game bravos4evr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    906
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    285
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    135 Posts
    If they can ditch Markakis and Garcia, add Cespedes, Ramos/Castro and Prado for 3b, I think they could be a WC contender even without pen help. Simmons should be back and able to close. (and if we do add pen arms, they will be low cost variety 7th inning or LOOGY variety)

    Yeah, I think that team could give 85 wins a run for the money and that usually means that come Sept you are in the hunt for the 2nd WC spot.
    "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"- Tom Waits

  3. #3
    Arizona Fall Leaguer
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    100
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravos4evr View Post
    If they can ditch Markakis and Garcia, add Cespedes, Ramos/Castro and Prado for 3b, I think they could be a WC contender even without pen help. Simmons should be back and able to close. (and if we do add pen arms, they will be low cost variety 7th inning or LOOGY variety)


    Yeah, I think that team could give 85 wins a run for the money and that usually means that come Sept you are in the hunt for the 2nd WC spot.
    Where's Vizcaino going? You think Simmons closes over him?

  4. #4
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    297
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    419
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    No. We can compete with mediocrity, but we aren't competing for anything meaningful in 2017.

  5. #5
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    I don't think we'll give up a high second round pick. But we will see. I'm hoping that maybe part of the deal with Desmond and Cespedes is that they would not get a QO the next year.

    I think we could be good like this:

    CF: mallex-no way he has RF arm
    RF-Inciarte
    LF-Cespedes or Desmond

    3B-Prado or maybe a salary dump like Plouffe in a bounce back. Maybe Freese. Don't think we touch Reyes with HO looming.
    SS-Swanson
    2B-Albies or maybe Prado here
    1B-FF

    C-one of the many 30 yo options

    Pitchers mature. Maybe a Jenkins comes in and upgrades the journeyman/Perez spot

    Simmons and Winkler and Minter come back from injury for pen.

    I think team competes....but I'm thinking 500 maybe, not playoffs.

    What I think will happen is that they'll look for a major trade.
    If they get the major trade: Move forward with a plan to compete. Probably look to buy some guys. Maybe get an overpriced guy who is still an upgrade for cheap...like Brandon Phillips

    If we cannot swing the trade: Then I think we only look to get guys who are no going to cost a draft pick. Be conservative on spend. Look for some reclamation projects. And sell next year on the new stadium plus Swanson, Albies, etc.

  6. #6
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,368
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,806
    Thanked in
    2,448 Posts
    Got to reject this theory for one big reason. You say the pitching doesn't change. There will be a massive shakeup of the pitching staff. Norris gives way, Jenkins has an essential role, Simmons does remain a question mark, but wwe have three major league capable pitchers who will be back from TJ surgery by spring of 2017.

    Agree that it would be a tough call to give up high 2nd pick for a free agent signing.

  7. #7
    Still Playing the Waiting Game bravos4evr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    906
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    285
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ATLBraves247 View Post
    Where's Vizcaino going? You think Simmons closes over him?
    I think he gets moved at the deadline this year
    "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"- Tom Waits

  8. #8
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    The Braves will never play at the top end of the Free-Agent market - anyone who thinks differently is an absolute idiot.

    That's what I've been told anyway.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  9. #9
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    The Braves will never play at the top end of the Free-Agent market - anyone who thinks differently is an absolute idiot.

    That's what I've been told anyway.
    Because that's the truth.

    However, "playing at the top of the FA market" means doling out $150M-$200M+ FA contracts. While the Braves will certainly not do that (mostly because there aren't any "elite" players hitting the market this year), they can upgrade 3B, LF and C without handing out anything remotely close to that type of contract.

    Castro is an excellent defensive catcher and would make a great platoon partner with Flowers. I would expect him to sign for something like 4/40.

    Desmond or Ces could anchor LF. Desmond could take over 3B. The new CBA will almost certainly get rid of the loss of a draft pick for signing FAs, so the Braves won't have to worry about that. MLBTR predicts Ces is the only guy that might top $100M, which the Braves can afford if it's not way above $100M. They say Desmond is likely to command a 3 year deal, which the Braves can certainly afford.

    Guys like Prado and Freese are certainly affordable and would be solid additions.

    So if you're asking me if this team:

    C - Castro/Flowers
    1B - Freeman
    2B - Albies
    SS - Swanson
    3B - Desmond/Prado/Freese
    LF - Ces/Desmond
    CF - Mallex/Inciarte
    RF - Inciarte/Markakis

    could make a WC run, I say yes. That is an above average lineup, and the Braves can afford to make it happen.

    The difference between them being a .500 team and a WC team is how well the young pitching progresses in 2017.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 06-21-2016 at 06:35 PM.

  10. #10
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    We can upgrade without going after anyone with a QO. We will be a .500 team give or take a few wins.

  11. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    Cespedes wouldn't cost a 2nd round pick since his contract is an opt out. So for that reason (and because we HAVE to spend money) I think he will be high on our list this offseason. I would also like to bring in Justin Turner

  12. #12
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Cespedes wouldn't cost a 2nd round pick since his contract is an opt out. So for that reason (and because we HAVE to spend money) I think he will be high on our list this offseason. I would also like to bring in Justin Turner
    Opt outs can be offered a QO. See Zach Greinke who cost the Diamondbacks their #1 pick.

    I think our shopping list will be as follows:

    Catcher-from among Wieters/Castro/Ramos, maybe a trade if say the Yankees make one of McCann/Sanchez available

    3rd-Prado/Turner/Freese. I'm assuming those three do not get a QO but Ian Desmond does.

    Established reliever who can pitch the 7th or 8th.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 06-21-2016 at 07:36 PM.

  13. #13
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    But, if we plan on competing, then there's basically no way we can trade JT. Our rotation in 2017 as of now if JT, Wisler, and ??? No one is really stepping up like we need. So I think ideally, we would need to bring in a veteran innings eater like Gio Gonzalez or Jeremy Hellickson.

  14. #14
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Because that's the truth.

    However, "playing at the top of the FA market" means doling out $150M-$200M+ FA contracts. While the Braves will certainly not do that (mostly because there aren't any "elite" players hitting the market this year), they can upgrade 3B, LF and C without handing out anything remotely close to that type of contract.

    Castro is an excellent defensive catcher and would make a great platoon partner with Flowers. I would expect him to sign for something like 4/40.

    Desmond or Ces could anchor LF. Desmond could take over 3B. The new CBA will almost certainly get rid of the loss of a draft pick for signing FAs, so the Braves won't have to worry about that. MLBTR predicts Ces is the only guy that might top $100M, which the Braves can afford if it's not way above $100M. They say Desmond is likely to command a 3 year deal, which the Braves can certainly afford.

    Guys like Prado and Freese are certainly affordable and would be solid additions.

    So if you're asking me if this team:

    C - Castro/Flowers
    1B - Freeman
    2B - Albies
    SS - Swanson
    3B - Desmond/Prado/Freese
    LF - Ces/Desmond
    CF - Mallex/Inciarte
    RF - Inciarte/Markakis

    could make a WC run, I say yes. That is an above average lineup, and the Braves can afford to make it happen.

    The difference between them being a .500 team and a WC team is how well the young pitching progresses in 2017.
    This is my problem with you guys that say they won't play. You hedge to make the argument fit whichever way you want it to go.

    The two top free-agent bats that will be available this year are going to be Cespedes and Desmond. Both are going to get $20+ million per each. That IS the top of the market this winter, and there's absolutely no reason the Braves shouldn't be "in" on both of them since they're perfect fits.

    I realize the total contract dollars is your "out", but you're just playing the semantics game. The two top bats would likely cost the Braves $275 million - 5/$100 million for Desmond and 5/$175 for Cespedes, and they can easily afford that. That's still $50 million less than Stanton's deal with Miami.

    The biggest contract the organization has ever handed out before Freeman's deal was less than $100 million, sure. The problem is that you're not allowing for the change in economics league-wide. Freeman's deal looks like a bargain, and it's the biggest contract in team history.

    I realize it's tough to grasp, but a $175 million outlay for Cespedes these days isn't much different than Chipper's largest deal when adjusted. I also understand that everyone loves to hate on the brass for floating the idea that the club could be competitive as early as next season. They didn't come up with that idea without coming to the realization that they were going to spend substantial money to fill a hole or two to make that happen. They were smart enough to understand ALL the "answers" weren't coming from within - no matter how many prospects and picks they were going to be able to acquire.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  15. #15
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Opt outs can be offered a QO. See Zach Greinke who cost the Diamondbacks their #1 pick.

    I think our shopping list will be as follows:

    Catcher-from among Wieters/Castro/Ramos, maybe a trade if say the Yankees make one of McCann/Sanchez available

    3rd-Prado/Turner/Freese. I'm assuming those three do not get a QO but Ian Desmond does.

    Established reliever who can pitch the 7th or 8th.
    I didn't realize that.

  16. #16
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    But, if we plan on competing, then there's basically no way we can trade JT. Our rotation in 2017 as of now if JT, Wisler, and ??? No one is really stepping up like we need. So I think ideally, we would need to bring in a veteran innings eater like Gio Gonzalez or Jeremy Hellickson.
    I think we can find 3 serviceable starters out of Gant, Perez, Folty and Blair coming out of spring training next year. As the season goes forward, Newcomb and Sims could become options.

  17. #17
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    This is my problem with you guys that say they won't play. You hedge to make the argument fit whichever way you want it to go.

    The two top free-agent bats that will be available this year are going to be Cespedes and Desmond. Both are going to get $20+ million per each. That IS the top of the market this winter, and there's absolutely no reason the Braves shouldn't be "in" on both of them since they're perfect fits.

    I realize the total contract dollars is your "out", but you're just playing the semantics game. The two top bats would likely cost the Braves $275 million - 5/$100 million for Desmond and 5/$175 for Cespedes, and they can easily afford that. That's still $50 million less than Stanton's deal with Miami.

    The biggest contract the organization has ever handed out before Freeman's deal was less than $100 million, sure. The problem is that you're not allowing for the change in economics league-wide. Freeman's deal looks like a bargain, and it's the biggest contract in team history.

    I realize it's tough to grasp, but a $175 million outlay for Cespedes these days isn't much different than Chipper's largest deal when adjusted. I also understand that everyone loves to hate on the brass for floating the idea that the club could be competitive as early as next season. They didn't come up with that idea without coming to the realization that they were going to spend substantial money to fill a hole or two to make that happen. They were smart enough to understand ALL the "answers" weren't coming from within - no matter how many prospects and picks they were going to be able to acquire.
    I have NEVER hedged anything. I have ALWAYS stated the Braves will not hand out $150M+ FA contracts, and certainly not $200M contracts. So yes, in the worst FA year in recent history the Braves may shop "at the top of the FA market" because the FA market is complete garbage this year.

    If Ces wants something like 5/110-6/120 the Braves can afford it, and I think they should seriously consider it. He will sign the largest contract this offseason, and it will be about half of what the top FA contract has typically been over the last half decade. So go ahead, call that shopping at the top of the market if it makes you feel validated.

    You know damn well paying Ces $120m is completely different than paying Stras or Price $200m, so stop acting like they are equivalent signings.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 06-21-2016 at 08:21 PM.

  18. #18
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    We can upgrade without going after anyone with a QO. We will be a .500 team give or take a few wins.
    There is a pretty good chance teams won't lose a pick for signing a QO under the new CBA. Too many middle tier FAs have had their markets ranked by the QO, so I bet the MLBPA tries to get rid of it.

  19. #19
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    There is a pretty good chance teams won't lose a pick for signing a QO under the new CBA. Too many middle tier FAs have had their markets ranked by the QO, so I bet the MLBPA tries to get rid of it.
    We'll see. Manfred defended the current QO system pretty stoutly in a recent interview.

  20. #20
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,569
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    We can upgrade without going after anyone with a QO. We will be a .500 team give or take a few wins.

    Short of almost an entire roster overhaul this team isn't 20 games better next season.

Similar Threads

  1. Speaking of Game of Thrones....
    By JohnAdcox in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-12-2016, 05:10 PM
  2. Statistically speaking of 2014
    By rico43 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2014, 12:04 PM
  3. Speaking of Dumb Wars
    By Dalyn in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 04:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •