Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 193

Thread: 2021 BA Top 100

  1. #21
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,426
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,919
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,636
    Thanked in
    1,990 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Like I said, once those 3 lose eligibility the farm system is going to be bottom 10. Team desperately needs a change in approach to drafting.
    Not really. The team's draft approach has been strategic and will change as their needs change. Had they not lost out on international resources, they'd be fine. That's the killer.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to UNCBlue012 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-25-2021), salmagundy (01-25-2021)

  3. #22
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Not really. The team's draft approach has been strategic and will change as their needs change. Had they not lost out on international resources, they'd be fine. That's the killer.

    Hard to evaluate anyone's system with the minor season wiped out. I don't know that it's bad right now.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Southcack77 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-25-2021)

  5. #23
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Like I said, once those 3 lose eligibility the farm system is going to be bottom 10. Team desperately needs a change in approach to drafting.
    You could say the same for most teams that are not top 6-7 farm systems right now. Losing development in 2020 is going to affect that. The Braves still have lots of talent that could/should see improvement this year and take the place of those exhausting their eligibility. I imagine at this time in 2022, we'll have at least new 2-3 more names on top 100 lists. Muller, Langeliers, Shoemake, and Contreras are all somewhat likely candidates to be featured on Top 100 lists by mid-season. And this makes no mention of possibly our highest upside hitters in Harris and Ball who definitely would have moved on to one of these lists had they continued their trends from 2019. Schuster also has a chance to make a top 100 list if his rookie campaign goes well.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-25-2021)

  7. #24
    Arbitration Eligible NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,151
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    720
    Thanked in
    526 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Not really. The team's draft approach has been strategic and will change as their needs change. Had they not lost out on international resources, they'd be fine. That's the killer.
    Hard to find any issues with the draft approach. Whether guys pan out is another thing, and will have more to do with development. But with the stiff penalties we faced, the organization made the decision to go with this approach and time will tell if it pans out.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to NYCBrave For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  9. #25
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,426
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,919
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,636
    Thanked in
    1,990 Posts
    Keith Law's Top-100 rankings are out and four Braves made the list: Pache (3); Anderson (15); Shewmake (64); Contreras (70).

    As previously noted, he is REALLY low on Drew Waters but not being a top-100 prospect is a bit absurd.

    Link: https://theathletic.com/2338178/2021...shared_article
    Last edited by UNCBlue012; 01-28-2021 at 08:56 AM.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to UNCBlue012 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  11. #26
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Keith Law's Top-100 rankings are out and four Braves made the list: Pache (3); Anderson (15); Shewmake (64); Contreras (70).

    As previously noted, he is REALLY low on Drew Waters but not being a top-100 prospect is a bit absurd.

    Link: https://theathletic.com/2338178/2021...shared_article
    Didn't he say Freeman was another Sean Casey type of hitter and Riley would never amount to anything? I know not everyone is right 100% of the time, but he has made some very boneheaded statements before.

    Even if you don't like Water's approach, you can't deny the raw talent and the production at an younger than the league average. Not having him top 100 is extremely laughable. At the very least, he profiles as a good defensive CFer with some speed and pop. Comparable players would be Drew Stubbs or Michael Taylor. Those guys are not terrific and they are not starters on a playoff caliber team, but they're useful players. However, if he reaches his full potential, you could be looking at someone like Starling Marte or Hunter Pence.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  13. #27
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Didn't he say Freeman was another Sean Casey type of hitter and Riley would never amount to anything? I know not everyone is right 100% of the time, but he has made some very boneheaded statements before.

    Even if you don't like Water's approach, you can't deny the raw talent and the production at an younger than the league average. Not having him top 100 is extremely laughable. At the very least, he profiles as a good defensive CFer with some speed and pop. Comparable players would be Drew Stubbs or Michael Taylor. Those guys are not terrific and they are not starters on a playoff caliber team, but they're useful players. However, if he reaches his full potential, you could be looking at someone like Starling Marte or Hunter Pence.
    i think it was worse than Sean Casey. peak Sean Casey was damn good offensively, and Freddie has put up a bunch of seasons like peak Sean Casey.

    being wrong on a prospect happens to everybody though, so holding that stuff against someone doesn't make much sense. the more annoying part with him is he will fight and fight and fight and say he wasn't wrong when he clearly was. i wonder if he acknowledges yet that Freeman is better than Belt.

    i agree with you re: his Waters assessment tho. he's pretty clearly a top 100 guy even if you're low on him (like i am).
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Super For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  15. #28
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    514
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    212
    Thanked in
    128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Keith Law's Top-100 rankings are out and four Braves made the list: Pache (3); Anderson (15); Shewmake (64); Contreras (70).

    As previously noted, he is REALLY low on Drew Waters but not being a top-100 prospect is a bit absurd.

    Link: https://theathletic.com/2338178/2021...shared_article
    Law continuing to not list Drew Waters as a top 100 guy just reeks of his insecurities. He can't admit when he's wrong. I get the concerns about contact, but any kid who hits .320 as a 20 yr Old in AA is 110% a top 100 prospect in baseball. It's comically foolish to suggest otherwise

  16. #29
    Arbitration Eligible NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,151
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    720
    Thanked in
    526 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IslandBrave View Post
    Law continuing to not list Drew Waters as a top 100 guy just reeks of his insecurities. He can't admit when he's wrong. I get the concerns about contact, but any kid who hits .320 as a 20 yr Old in AA is 110% a top 100 prospect in baseball. It's comically foolish to suggest otherwise
    Keith Law is known for this approach. He's been doing it for years. He will stick to his initial assessment of a player and refuse to ever admit he's wrong about that. It's as arrogant of an approach as you will find, but it's no surprise he doesn't list Waters.

  17. #30
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,743
    Thanked in
    1,269 Posts
    Law is way low on Waters, but damn, Pache as the third-best prospect in baseball is really high, no?

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to MadduxFanII For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  19. #31
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MadduxFanII View Post
    Law is way low on Waters, but damn, Pache as the third-best prospect in baseball is really high, no?
    Yah I agree on that too. I know pitchers are riskier, but what Anderson showed last season/post-season is way better than what Pache showed, imo. So I would put him over Pache. I also feel pretty safe penciling Anderson in as a 2-3 WAR pitcher going forward, which should automatically put him ahead almost every pitcher on that list.

  20. #32
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NYCBrave View Post
    Keith Law is known for this approach. He's been doing it for years. He will stick to his initial assessment of a player and refuse to ever admit he's wrong about that. It's as arrogant of an approach as you will find, but it's no surprise he doesn't list Waters.
    Always really hard to find any rhyme or reason to his lists - he always seems to be way higher or way lower than most of the other "experts". For example...

    Forrest Whitley - BA #80, Law #29
    Bobby Witt - BA #16, Law #27
    Nolan Jones - BA #45, Law #86
    Tristan Casas - BA #47, Law #87
    Contreras - BA NR, Law #70

    You don't expect everybody's lists to look exactly the same, but if they're using info they've gotten from scouts as a part of their evaluations you'd think that players would at least be in the same ballpark on each list - Law regularly has guys that wind up 30-40 spots higher or lower than they are on other lists.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  21. #33
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    Always really hard to find any rhyme or reason to his lists - he always seems to be way higher or way lower than most of the other "experts". For example...

    Forrest Whitley - BA #80, Law #29
    Bobby Witt - BA #16, Law #27
    Nolan Jones - BA #45, Law #86
    Tristan Casas - BA #47, Law #87
    Contreras - BA NR, Law #70

    You don't expect everybody's lists to look exactly the same, but if they're using info they've gotten from scouts as a part of their evaluations you'd think that players would at least be in the same ballpark on each list - Law regularly has guys that wind up 30-40 spots higher or lower than they are on other lists.
    I like Klaw. He has an approach and he explains it.

    One thing I noticed about the list this year, it's OLD. I swear half the list is 23 plus. Lots of 24, 25 on the list.

    He's always been super high on Pache. He thinks Pache is an 80 fielder with solid power.
    He's always been super high on Shewmake. Seems to think he's a 300 hitter with solid SS defense. Maybe this is true and why there is zero Dansby extension buzz.

    He's been high on Wright, but not this year.

    He has been super low on Riley and Waters. I think he's been mostly right on Riley.

    Predicting the future is hard.

  22. #34
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    If Law doesn't think the peripherals or tools match then there is no reason he necessarily has to be moved by an obviously not substainable BABIP and put him in Top 100.

  23. #35
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    If Law doesn't think the peripherals or tools match then there is no reason he necessarily has to be moved by an obviously not substainable BABIP and put him in Top 100.
    100% agree and if we could headline a joRam trade with him then we need to do it.
    Coppy

  24. #36
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    I like Klaw. He has an approach and he explains it.

    One thing I noticed about the list this year, it's OLD. I swear half the list is 23 plus. Lots of 24, 25 on the list.

    He's always been super high on Pache. He thinks Pache is an 80 fielder with solid power.
    He's always been super high on Shewmake. Seems to think he's a 300 hitter with solid SS defense. Maybe this is true and why there is zero Dansby extension buzz.

    He's been high on Wright, but not this year.

    He has been super low on Riley and Waters. I think he's been mostly right on Riley.

    Predicting the future is hard.
    I don't know if Baseball Prospectus still does it this way, but they used to give each prospect two scores. The first score was a ceiling score and the second score was an estimate of the chances the player would reach the ceiling score. It may be that Law believes Waters has a fairly high ceiling, but a fairly low chance of reaching it. Translating, it's all about the player's tools and their ability to apply those tools all the way to the majors. Lots of guys have great tools but can never get it together.

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  26. #37
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    If Law doesn't think the peripherals or tools match then there is no reason he necessarily has to be moved by an obviously not substainable BABIP and put him in Top 100.
    I also am unimpressed by Waters. A dude with an insanely lucky .430 BABIP should be posting an OPS way higher than .850. To me, he’s just another one of those toolsy OF prospects who never puts together much of a career because they simply can’t hit the ball.

    Having said that, FG has Waters #69 as a FV 50 guy. They also have a guy nobody has ever heard of named Isaac Peredes at #115 as a FV 50. There isn’t a ton of difference between #69 and #115, so there no real reason to be upset if Waters isn’t inside some arbitrarily sized Top X list.

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

  28. #38
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,055
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    121
    Thanked in
    93 Posts
    Waters consistently barrels baseballs. That counts for something. That's a skill he has at a young age. The hope is that with experience, he refines his approach because he's going to get less hittable pitches in the majors. But it's not like it's a slap hitting guy posting high BABIPs.

  29. #39
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Consistently barrels baseballs? Hot take here everyone!!

  30. #40
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,392
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,746
    Thanked in
    1,975 Posts
    I mean, that's a phrase scouts consistently use, so I'm sure there's something to it. I recall hearing similar scouting takes about Ozzie coming up.

    I think the take from that is that he hits the ball hard with a lot of frequency, something his hard hit% should reflect, and therefore would support a higher BABIP. Do we have those sort of numbers for minor leaguers? I haven't the faintest idea of where to look for those.

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •