January 6th insurrection thread...

[Tapate50]

No one wants to address Mrs. Beetlejuice screaming to crowds to burn down the SC, and to F Clarence Thomas?

I didn't think so.

[Garmel]

no bad wording... but the minute she does announce it, the seals will clap

Yep. If she writes it they'll be quoting lines out her book as if it's the Gospel. The obsession runs deep with these people.

[thethe]

No one wants to address Mrs. Beetlejuice screaming to crowds to burn down the SC, and to F Clarence Thomas?

I didn't think so.

They haven't called out their 6 year insurrection so why would they start now?

[sturg33]

No one wants to address Mrs. Beetlejuice screaming to crowds to burn down the SC, and to F Clarence Thomas?

I didn't think so.

"iT's A fAlSe EqUiViLeNcE!!!"

[thethe]

The left is going to be looking around after Nov 22 and wonder what the hell happened.

We have been telling you that you were crazy for a LONG time.

[thethe]

Republicans need to grow a ****ing spine or else be shown the door.

[thethe]

DESPERATION.

They know he is coming back and they know all of their lies will be revealed. Term 2 {3} is going to be lit.

[Garmel]

DESPERATION.

They know he is coming back and they know all of their lies will be revealed. Term 2 {3} is going to be lit.

In a sane world this charade the J6 commission tried to pull yesterday would have ended it. However, it will go on lying, editing video tape, etc. and the seals here will clap.

[Garmel]

[thethe]

Thats got to be admissible for the J6 super legit hearings on Democracy!!!

[thethe]

Its all so wonderful

[Jaw]

Its all so wonderful

They don't need to verify it. It isn't about finding the truth, it's about providing clips for CNN/MSNBC/late night hosts/The View/etc to run non stop, and quotes for big city newspapers to run. Anything refuting those quotes will be ignored or back paged. Show trial.

[sturg33]

Not a fan of Rep Cheney but pretty sure she doesn't put someone on the stand without corroborating stories.
Isn't it at least 3 ?

Imagine ten years ago 57 calling a Cheney competent

They are not competent. And you are so incredibly stupid to fall for it. Every. Single. Time.

[sturg33]

They don't need to verify it. It isn't about finding the truth, it's about providing clips for CNN/MSNBC/late night hosts/The View/etc to run non stop, and quotes for big city newspapers to run. Anything refuting those quotes will be ignored or back paged. Show trial.

When the committee declines to bring the opposing witness on stand, the seals will see that as proof that Hutchison was truthful

The critical thinker will see that as proof this is a show trial for seals

[nsacpi]

What bothers me is the coverage Hutchinson's testimony is getting. If you go to CNNs website right now you'll see articles about how Hutchinson stood up for democracy and how she's the witness America waited for.

The problem is she has serious credibility issues now. She told this story of secret service agents telling her about trump lunging for the wheel and now we have agents willing to testify that not only did that not happen, no one told her it did.

If it's true the agents are willing to testify to that, then Hutchinson's testimony is essentially worthless now as you can't trust anything she said that's not independently verifiable.

The story of her testimony is that it's unreliable, not that she's standing up for democracy. Her testimony should be ignored and the focus should be on the other evidence.

[mqt]

They don't need to verify it. It isn't about finding the truth, it's about providing clips for CNN/MSNBC/late night hosts/The View/etc to run non stop, and quotes for big city newspapers to run. Anything refuting those quotes will be ignored or back paged. Show trial.

I agree with this. The biggest problem I have with the recent “developments” is that it really doesn’t matter much. I don’t doubt for even a nanosecond that Trump was content to let the rioters do whatever. I’ve thought that from the beginning, because Trump is a narcissistic asshole. Nothing in this “bombshell” would be even remotely surprising to me, yet I still don’t see the point of rehashing all of this. If Trump, his team or his congressional supporters were materially involved, it’d be almost impossible to prove unless they can prove both that they helped organize the rally AND that the rally was a specific front to get supporters in the Capitol to disrupt the election process. Anything less than that is a waste of time, and that’s the almost certain conclusion. You’re not going to persuade anybody that doesn’t already dislike Trump that you should, and you don’t need to convince people that already disliked him. It’s somehow equally politically driven and politically ineffective in a way I can hardly comprehend.

[striker42]

Difference is you have multiple agents willing to testify that what Hutchinson claimed she was told (about Trump lunging) never happened. There's also no reason for anyone to have made up that story and told Hutchinson. So if it didn't happen we can safely assume no one told Hutchinson did.

Ultimately it's not word vs word like your example here, there are multiple people willing to testify under oath that Hutchinson's story is incorrect.

There's the added fact that Hutchinson quite possibly has an interest in making her testimony as inflammatory as possible. If she's looking for a book deal, stories like that one would be eye catching to a publisher.

If she was testifying in a court of law and I was the defense, I'd almost want to let her testify and not object based on hearsay knowing I have two credible witnesses to refute her and in doing so destroy her credibility.

[nsacpi]

Difference is you have multiple agents willing to testify that what Hutchinson claimed she was told (about Trump lunging) never happened.

It will be interesting to see what the testimony under oath is.

Something to consider:

[sturg33]

They won't be invited.

You are too stupid to vote, by the way

[Garmel]

People have a desperate need to cling to fake news. It somehow has to be true because it puts Trump in a bad light.