January 6th insurrection thread...

[Garmel]

lolololol

[cajunrevenge]

[cajunrevenge]

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/nati...ttack/5208438/


Trump supporter who fired 2 shots from his gun at the J6 insurrection arrested. I guess no one told it was a pepper spray only insurrection.

[Tapate50]

Per cajun-

When cops destroy evidence it’s bad

When feds do it - no big deal

[msstate7]

Per cajun-

When cops destroy evidence it’s bad

When feds do it - no big deal

Think it's just he supports curruption as long the corrupt align with his politics

[thethe]

It’s going to be the same thing when actual inspection happens on the 2020 election and it’s an established fact it was stolen. They will not be outraged at all.

When you’re trying to stop Hitler all of this is fine. Actually, it’s more than fine. It’s an act of courage!

[Garmel]

It is not malfeasance. What was deleted were videos of interviews for which there are transcripts available transcribed by the non partisan clerks office and checked for errors by the witness. Literally nothing wrong with doing that. You people just want to deflect. You people are more upset they deleted duplicate information than you are about people trying to overthrow the government. Says a lot about you.

That's what the committee says what the deleted files are. We only have their word on that.

If that's true then why did they fight tooth and nail to keep the files deleted and hidden for something we already know? How does that make sense?

You're about the dumbest SOB I've ever seen and that's saying something.

[cajunrevenge]

Well your side had the chance to be a part of the committee with the only caveat being that witnesses cant be on the committee. And this is why they turned it down. They had no defense so best to not be a part and just throw rocks from outside. Your side is perfectly capable of doing their own investigation. Find all this exculpatory evidence you claim was deleted. They want no part in that. The reason they deleted the interview is because your side would selectively release interviews to their rabid cult where they dont like what the person said and that person would get harassed by the cult. Harder for them to do that with transcripts. You can gaslight all you want its never going to work.

[cajunrevenge]

It’s going to be the same thing when actual inspection happens on the 2020 election and it’s an established fact it was stolen. They will not be outraged at all.

When you’re trying to stop Hitler all of this is fine. Actually, it’s more than fine. It’s an act of courage!

I see you are at the "It hasnt been proven but we will prove it one day" part of the cycle. Your next hoax is due any day now.

[cajunrevenge]

Per cajun-

When cops destroy evidence it’s bad

When feds do it - no big deal

Its not destroyed. You can read the transcripts...... Context is like kryptonite to you people.

[Garmel]

lol.

You can't make this **** up, folks.

[Garmel]

Well your side had the chance to be a part of the committee with the only caveat being that witnesses cant be on the committee. And this is why they turned it down. They had no defense so best to not be a part and just throw rocks from outside. Your side is perfectly capable of doing their own investigation. Find all this exculpatory evidence you claim was deleted. They want no part in that. The reason they deleted the interview is because your side would selectively release interviews to their rabid cult where they dont like what the person said and that person would get harassed by the cult. Harder for them to do that with transcripts. You can gaslight all you want its never going to work.

I would love to hook you up to a lie detector. You don't believe that any more than I do.

You lie and misdirect everything.

[cajunrevenge]

Believe what? What exactly could they have deleted that would have been exculpatory? You got nothing and are just implying sinister motives to mundane ****. So much of this all happened right before our eyes. I dont even know what could potentially be exculpatory that they could try to hide. Did they find evidence Pelosi was wearing a Trump disguise and giving the speech on J6 and not Trump? Were the insurrectionists Antifa in a 30 year deep cover just to make Trump look bad?

[Garmel]

lol

[cajunrevenge]

So thats a no, you cant tell me what could be exculpatory they would need to hide?

[thethe]

How is it that Trump participated in an insurrection when he requested 10k guardsmen to keep the peace?

[Garmel]

So thats a no, you cant tell me what could be exculpatory they would need to hide?

We have no idea what it could be. If they didn't want us to see it and have fought to keep it out of our hands it probably goes against the official narrative and damning.

[cajunrevenge]

If theres evidence against the official narrative and damning why arent Republicans conducting their own investigation to find it. As I said earlier you people are just trying to deflect from the crime by trying to turn the focus on the investigators. You do this with literally everything.

[Garmel]

It's because the investigators like Liz keep pulling bull****. We've seen this constantly from these people.

You constantly defend corruption like this and the Colorado case.

The republicans can't do anything about it until they're in power again. A DC judge said the committee could do it.

[thethe]

If theres evidence against the official narrative and damning why arent Republicans conducting their own investigation to find it. As I said earlier you people are just trying to deflect from the crime by trying to turn the focus on the investigators. You do this with literally everything.

What would you think about the day if Trump requested 10K guardsmen but was refused by Pelosi/Bowser?