Both disputed the results. One conceded and moved on when he lost the court battle. The other continued long after losing the court battle. Dershowitz's legal theory was regarding counting of votes that were DQ'd for one reason or another and his lobbying of state reps was in regards to Florida having a deadline set by them to certify their vote. Precedent by the state court ruled that ballots which failed to meet a requirement but showed intent should be counted and are not illegal ballots. Dershowitz argued that these should be applied to under and over vote ballots where intent was clear, and specifically the butterfly ballots that were slightly misleading. The Florida Supreme court very rarely overturned precedent so the belief was that the case should be sent back to the Florida Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling said there wasnt time to do the needed recounts before the December 18th deadline required by Florida state law. When Gore lost the lawsuit he conceded and carried out his duty as VP to count the votes certified by the states. That is not in any way comprable to what Trump and Eastman did. Their "legal theory" was to have Pence make unsupported claims of election integrity issues to send it back to only the states Trump lost that had Republican legislatures for "audit" whereby Trump would pressure them to either give him the electoral votes or declare no winner could be determined to deprive Biden of 270 votes so the election goes to the House where Republicans had the voting advantage. That is in no way comprable to what Gore and Dershowitz tried to do.
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...g/73135511007/
More voter fraud,
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."