January 6th insurrection thread...

[goldfly]

[zitothebrave]

You still don’t get it do you?

I wonder if it’s true ignorance or intentional. Let me dwell on that longer.

I've never seen someone so willing to die on a hill over something so unimportant.

[thethe]

You still don’t get it do you?

I wonder if it’s true ignorance or intentional. Let me dwell on that longer.

After some deliberation I’ve determined it’s ignorance.

Shame

[thethe]

I've never seen someone so willing to die on a hill over something so unimportant.

Do you still not get it?

[zitothebrave]

Do you still not get it?

No I don't get why someone is so willing to die on a hill over something that's never succeeded in a randomized trial.

This would be like if someone came out and said that sunning your butthole is the key to beating Covid, then they did a ton of randomized studies showing no benefit, but you still insisted on it because you're so bought into Goop.

[thethe]

No I don't get why someone is so willing to die on a hill over something that's never succeeded in a randomized trial.

This would be like if someone came out and said that sunning your butthole is the key to beating Covid, then they did a ton of randomized studies showing no benefit, but you still insisted on it because you're so bought into Goop.

You really don’t understand why this study is irrelevant.

Critical thinking is lacking.

My suggestion would be to look back at how HCQ was advocated and when it should be used. Then marry that to this study.

Hopefully I’ve laid out enough breadcrumbs for you to understand.

[nsacpi]

Insight of the day from nsacpi: a hundred trials of placebo A against placebo B will show placebo A more effective about 50% of the time.

That's why you need an actual understanding of how to extract signal from noise to show efficacy of any treatment.

thethe's great gift is extracting noise from noise

[zitothebrave]

You really don’t understand why this study is irrelevant.

Critical thinking is lacking.

My suggestion would be to look back at how HCQ was advocated and when it should be used. Then marry that to this study.

Hopefully I’ve laid out enough breadcrumbs for you to understand.

That isn't a study. That was a collection of studies. Read the whole article. I know you won't because you're so far down the rabbit hole that even after your boy lost you're still there.

[thethe]

That isn't a study. That was a collection of studies. Read the whole article. I know you won't because you're so far down the rabbit hole that even after your boy lost you're still there.

The data set was explained clearly.

You either lack the intelligence to understand or refuse to admit you are wrong. Again, I’ve paid the breadcrumbs. You have to choose whether you want them or not.

[zitothebrave]

The data set was explained clearly.

You either lack the intelligence to understand or refuse to admit you are wrong. Again, I’ve paid the breadcrumbs. You have to choose whether you want them or not.

I know what you're attempting to say, your studies are the only real ones. Even though randomized studies show no efficacy. What you're saying is you know more than major clinical researchers. We get it, supporting Trump gives you god level brain powers to see through the lies of the CCP backed baby sacrificing scientists.

[thethe]

I know what you're attempting to say, your studies are the only real ones. Even though randomized studies show no efficacy. What you're saying is you know more than major clinical researchers. We get it, supporting Trump gives you god level brain powers to see through the lies of the CCP backed baby sacrificing scientists.

Hopeless. I’ll continue to use the Socratic method. You’ll never grow otherwise.

[Jaw]

How about your 1932 posts?

How about your German posts?

How about your gang rape posts?

It’s cute when you pretend you haven’t been wrong embarasingly so more than anyone.

Now just a minute, this goes too far.

I was adamant that Wentz would be more productive than Ian Anderson, and that Waters would be in Atlanta before Pache.

[nsacpi]

Now just a minute, this goes too far.

I was adamant that Wentz would be more productive than Ian Anderson, and that Waters would be in Atlanta before Pache.

that's what happens when you go to the games and use your own eyes to scout and form opinions

[thethe]

Now just a minute, this goes too far.

I was adamant that Wentz would be more productive than Ian Anderson, and that Waters would be in Atlanta before Pache.

I was hoping to exclude sport takes.

I’m unmatched in my stupidity there.

[nsacpi]

I was hoping to exclude sport takes.

I’m unmatched in my stupidity there.

hey you got Gattis and Fried right

[Jaw]

hey you got Gattis and Fried right

No one has been right about more of the Braves' successful prospects than thethe. He literally predicted the success of every one of them. Legend.

[zitothebrave]

Hopeless. I’ll continue to use the Socratic method. You’ll never grow otherwise.

Buahahahaha

Socratic Method has nothing to do with data produced by randomized blind studies.

[thethe]

Buahahahaha

Socratic Method has nothing to do with data produced by randomized blind studies.

Oooof.

That one went past you as well.

Maybe the correction given in the BLM thread will have you revisit what you’re doing wrong here.

[sturg33]

For

Thethe track record >>>> lecturer track record

I've never seen someone so sure of himself get everything so consistently wrong... he's probably adjusting his second mask as we speak

[sturg33]

The last time a Party lost re-election for President and both houses of Congress was....... 1932.

The lecturer assured us of a beat down so massive that it would take decades for the GOP to recover any power.

I'd be curious if he now thing the dems will control the house all the way through... 2022