Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: FG article on lineup construction

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts

    FG article on lineup construction

    FG just posted an article on line up construction showing why all hitters with the same wOBA don't lead to as many runs as others: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/should-g...-investigates/

    TDLR for anyone who doesn't want to read it all: Put your high OBP guys lead off, your sluggers lower in the order, and good hitters in the middle...or exactly what we've already known.

    How does this apply to the Braves? That silly little topic of batting Acuna lead off because that's supposedly where he was batting that unlocked his immense potential. Arguably the best power hitter on the team should not be batting behind the worst hitters in the lineup, and this simulation shows such a decision could cost upwards of half a win per year.

    In a season where the Braves are projected to finish 1-2 wins behind the Mets, I want that half win.

  2. #2
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,069
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Zero chance snit moves Acuna out of leadoff. His mind can only process what he has seen and it tells him Acuna is only good because he is hitting leadoff. Probably just an average to below average hitter anywhere else in his mind.
    Coppy

  3. #3
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    765
    Thanked in
    445 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    FG just posted an article on line up construction showing why all hitters with the same wOBA don't lead to as many runs as others: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/should-g...-investigates/

    TDLR for anyone who doesn't want to read it all: Put your high OBP guys lead off, your sluggers lower in the order, and good hitters in the middle...or exactly what we've already known.

    How does this apply to the Braves? That silly little topic of batting Acuna lead off because that's supposedly where he was batting that unlocked his immense potential. Arguably the best power hitter on the team should not be batting behind the worst hitters in the lineup, and this simulation shows such a decision could cost upwards of half a win per year.

    In a season where the Braves are projected to finish 1-2 wins behind the Mets, I want that half win.
    I haven't read it yet, but who would you put in the leadoff spot? Albies? Swanson?

    Pretty much all the high OBP guys are also top power hitters. Which I guess is a good problem to have.

  4. #4
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,490
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,024
    Thanked in
    5,508 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DirkPiggler View Post
    I haven't read it yet, but who would you put in the leadoff spot? Albies? Swanson?

    Pretty much all the high OBP guys are also top power hitters. Which I guess is a good problem to have.
    Exactly. Which is why Acuña makes sense near the top of the order (just not lead off where he’s going to hit a bunch of solo homers). He does not need to be at the bottom of the order. Top 1/3 of the middle of the order is the sweet spot. So, cleanup, in other words.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to CyYoung31 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (02-16-2021)

  6. #5
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    With Neck, two-three years ago there was a good argument to bat him leadoff with his OBP and lack of power.

    On this team, who is the high OBP guy with low power? Are Dansby or Albies going to be a 350 OBP or better? This is a reason a lot of ppl really wanted Brantley and the DH, b/c it would be wonderful to have a LH, high OBP good hitter.

    With the current team don't you still have to go Acuna, FF, Ozuna? After that you argue Albies and TDA. Then Dansby. Then you have Riley and Pache bringing up the rear.

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,479
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,759
    Thanked in
    1,987 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DirkPiggler View Post
    I haven't read it yet, but who would you put in the leadoff spot? Albies? Swanson?

    Pretty much all the high OBP guys are also top power hitters. Which I guess is a good problem to have.
    Albies or Swanson are perfect leadoff hitters. They get on base at a good clip and don't have the power of the other guys. Or may be Waters will actually live up to his potential and Snit will finally put Acuna lower in the order since Waters is the "classic" leadoff (i.e. he's fast).

  8. #7
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,069
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Anyone other than the pitcher is acceptable to hit in front of Acuna. Having your 9th place bitter in front of arguably your best power guy is moronic.

    Power as in slugging. Not just a pure home run hitter.
    Coppy

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    DirkPiggler (02-13-2021), jpx7 (02-12-2021)

  10. #8
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DirkPiggler View Post
    I haven't read it yet, but who would you put in the leadoff spot? Albies? Swanson?

    Pretty much all the high OBP guys are also top power hitters. Which I guess is a good problem to have.
    Even Freeman makes a better leadoff hitter than Acuna with his higher OBP and lower power. I can't stand listening to Glavine talk about how awesome leadoff homers are when Acuna hits one, and then turn around and say that lead off homers don't bother him since they are only 1 run when the other team hits them. Leadoff homers suck for the offense when they are being hit by the best power hitter on the team because the manager decided to send him to the plate 150+ times with the bases empty.

    Against LHP, Albes is the obvious choice to lead off followed by Freeman, Ozuna and Acuna.

    Against RHP it's a lot trickier, and is part of the reason the Braves really need that LHH to fill the Markakis role. That guy should be batting leadoff vs RHP.

  11. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    DirkPiggler (02-13-2021), JohnAdcox (02-16-2021), jpx7 (02-12-2021), salmagundy (02-12-2021)

  12. #9
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,450
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,928
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,638
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Even Freeman makes a better leadoff hitter than Acuna with his higher OBP and lower power. I can't stand listening to Glavine talk about how awesome leadoff homers are when Acuna hits one, and then turn around and say that lead off homers don't bother him since they are only 1 run when the other team hits them. Leadoff homers suck for the offense when they are being hit by the best power hitter on the team because the manager decided to send him to the plate 150+ times with the bases empty.

    Against LHP, Albes is the obvious choice to lead off followed by Freeman, Ozuna and Acuna.

    Against RHP it's a lot trickier, and is part of the reason the Braves really need that LHH to fill the Markakis role. That guy should be batting leadoff vs RHP.
    Dear God it feels good to hear someone qualify my thoughts for the last two years.

  13. #10
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,902
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,649
    Thanked in
    1,033 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Even Freeman makes a better leadoff hitter than Acuna with his higher OBP and lower power. I can't stand listening to Glavine talk about how awesome leadoff homers are when Acuna hits one, and then turn around and say that lead off homers don't bother him since they are only 1 run when the other team hits them. Leadoff homers suck for the offense when they are being hit by the best power hitter on the team because the manager decided to send him to the plate 150+ times with the bases empty.

    Against LHP, Albes is the obvious choice to lead off followed by Freeman, Ozuna and Acuna.

    Against RHP it's a lot trickier, and is part of the reason the Braves really need that LHH to fill the Markakis role. That guy should be batting leadoff vs RHP.
    Understand you want LHH with high OBP at leadoff against RHP, but I'm not following here. Does Pache sit against RH pitchers? In favor of playing Matt Joyce (or similar) in RF? Or Ender in CF?

  14. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    Understand you want LHH with high OBP at leadoff against RHP, but I'm not following here. Does Pache sit against RH pitchers? In favor of playing Matt Joyce (or similar) in RF? Or Ender in CF?
    That’s what makes it tricky. Without the DH, there’s nowhere else to stick that LHH if the OF is Ozuna/Pache/Acuna. The answer might be to just have Albies in the leadoff hole full time and hope he makes progress vs RHP.

    But the Braves really should stop putting their 40+ HR guy in the leadoff slot. Of course, having a leadoff hitter hitting too many solo HRs is a pretty first world team problem to have.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (02-16-2021)

  16. #12
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,902
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,649
    Thanked in
    1,033 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    That’s what makes it tricky. Without the DH, there’s nowhere else to stick that LHH if the OF is Ozuna/Pache/Acuna. The answer might be to just have Albies in the leadoff hole full time and hope he makes progress vs RHP.

    But the Braves really should stop putting their 40+ HR guy in the leadoff slot. Of course, having a leadoff hitter hitting too many solo HRs is a pretty first world team problem to have.
    Concur on Acuña.

  17. #13
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,603
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,257
    Thanked in
    1,831 Posts
    Ideally, Acuna would bat 2nd but we dont have an ideal leadoff hitter right now. So Acuna at leadoff is okay imo.

  18. #14
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,069
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    Ideally, Acuna would bat 2nd but we dont have an ideal leadoff hitter right now. So Acuna at leadoff is okay imo.
    No. It is never acceptable to have your overall best hitter hitting in front of your overall worst hitter. Ever!! It is just dumb.
    Coppy

  19. #15
    Brian Jordan's New BFF JohnAdcox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,124
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,045
    Thanked in
    459 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    Ideally, Acuna would bat 2nd but we dont have an ideal leadoff hitter right now. So Acuna at leadoff is okay imo.
    Again with the whole Albies thing....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •