"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
It wouldn't shock me if MLB walked this decision back. They announce a decision to make a big show and then relent a little while later saying it's not fair to punish the Braves and the local community for the actions of the Georgia government. It allows them to make the show of a tough stand but also seem merciful. It also would prevent them from being liable for millions for breach of contracts/detrimental reliance.
Yeah. It's not just one game. It's a week of festivities. Lots of people needed to put that on. Everyone from people to work parking lots to cops to work security to people selling t-shirts on the side of the road. A lot of these people who will be taking the hit are the same people baseball is saying are the targets of this law.
Outside of the "ID requirement [...] for requesting an absentee ballot," which at least has the manifoldly-dubious justification of "integrity," there's really no way to spin those measures as anything other than increasing restrictions without any tangible benefits to the people of Georgia.The law also adds an ID requirement to the process for requesting an absentee ballot, after previously only requiring voters to sign an application. It also narrows the time window during which ballots can be requested.
It also restricts the use of drop boxes in the state, mandating that each county have at least one drop box but then limiting any additional drop box totaling the “lesser of either one drop box for every 100,000 active registered voters in the county or the number of advance voting locations in the county.” The law also requires that the drop boxes be located either at the office of the board of registrars or ballot clerk or inside early voting locations — and that they are closed when early voting isn’t being conducted.
But, more importantly and more broadly—as has been noted ad nauseam in many outlets—all Voter ID Laws are ballot-access-restrictive when not accompanied by a dramatic increase in the ease of obtaining the necessary identification on which they are incumbent. Making that process entirely gratis (or, for you gov-budge sticklers, governmentally subsidized) is merely but one condition for sufficiently-easy access. Without satisfaction of those conditions, Voted ID Laws substantially infringe ballot-access to those with limited income and/or mobility and/or time (the latter two of which usually coincide with the former)—and, because of this nation's litany of past sins, much of the lower-income community overlaps with black & brown minority communities (who have moreover suffered a litany of historical disenfranchisements that have given them less determinative stake in those very same disenfranchising laws being passed today).
That is why the whole suite of Georgia's new laws, and US Voter ID laws in general, are described as "racist"—it's a theoretical versus actual access issue that converges with racial realities of our country. But I suspect most of you begging What could possibly be racist about all this?!? already know that, just as I suspect Georgia Republicans already know that—and just as I suspect, moreover, that these very same issues, indeed, form a substantial part of their ultimate motivation in passing these laws.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
DaneHill (04-02-2021)
So what? How many did the previous guy get? It's neither here nor there. Voting hours are absolutely critical to an average worker as unless they have an employer that will be flexible, it can prove difficult to make the hours presented. The hours can be extended in case of emergency, but earliest is 7 and latest is 7PM. I don't care if you don't like a party or not, but common sense should apply no?
That would actually make them look worse, so I doubt it. But, then again, it is Manfred and he seems to thrive on outdoing himself.
And @deester11 thank you for detailing some actual issues with this bill. I’ve been searching all week and all I found were people and sites regurgitating the same vague statements and almost nothing about what’s in the bill itself that’s actually relevant to the issue of voter suppression.
I still think it’s a bit overblown though.
Ive mentioned my point on this several days ago and no one even responded or even the usual sarcastic response to anything not reflecting their position. This move by MLB, as painful as it is to Atlanta Braves and their fans has no impact on the voting or voters of Georgia. It is simply a concession by Manfred to Tony Clarks maneuver to get a head start on negotiations. Now Clark has lost that position because it was a meaningless point to baseball anyway.
Though striker's been really all over the place in this thread with missives, your point above, and his below, are I think two of the better arguments against this move by MLB—which itself is a discussion about the best form of resistance to Georgia's new laws, and restrictive voter laws in general (while taking it as a given that restricting ballot-access is bad).
Last edited by jpx7; 04-02-2021 at 04:19 PM.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
Voter ID is wildly popular, including with African Americans. So that's not a winning issue - especially when you consider a mail in ballot
The state has increased the number of drop boxes from where they were before the covid emergency election. That is progress. They are also ahead of most other cities in accessible drop boxes.
Why would they need to be open when voting isn't happening?
This all just seems like outrageous whining about something that isn't a big deal, and is not difficult to overcome for anyone who wants to vote. As mentioned, there are great odds the city the all star game moves to will have more restrictive voting access than GA
Yes overblown. But this whole matter grew out of the BIG LIE and one man's bruised and fragile ego and his followers determination to soothe that ego. I think Kemp did try to remove the more objectionable parts of the bill and succeeded in doing so. He is angry with Delta because he consulted with them on which provisions were problematic and had to be removed. So lots of people are in a tizzy about this.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."