Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ... 9171819
Results 361 to 374 of 374

Thread: GDT 10/16/21: Braves vs Dodgers - NLCS Game 1

  1. #361
    Arizona Fall Leaguer Sheffield10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    197
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    32 Posts
    Lololol Riley isn’t a good hitter guys. My MLB branded pogs had these stats clearly shown in the back of the box lololol

  2. #362
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,838
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,726
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,772
    Thanked in
    5,860 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheffield10 View Post
    Lololol Riley isn’t a good hitter guys. My MLB branded pogs had these stats clearly shown in the back of the box lololol

    Who said Riley isn't a good hitter?

  3. #363
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,027
    Thanked in
    6,130 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Robert's having random lefty pitch to Albies and Riley earlier was questionable as well.

    Snit didn't really have decisions to make, but they were all defensible.

    Braves don't really have a bench at this point so the platoon business is besides the point.

    Soler going out kind of made it moot.
    Roberts did make a couple tactical mistakes.

    If Gonsolin was going to only get 5 outs, why was he allowed to hit rather than double switching when he came in? That mistake cost them a PA in a 1 run game.

    The biggest mistake was still snit putting Rosario and Freeman back to back when he knew the Dodgers were going to use the BP in game 1. He set them up to neutralize the 1-2 spots almost every single time through the order, and that’s exactly what the Dodgers did. Worst part about it was snit had days to make his terrible plan, and still came up with that horrible solution.

    When the Dodgers start Scherzer and Buehler it won’t be a big deal to stack Rosario and Freeman at the top because they will certainly each face those RHPs at least 2x, and it may force Roberts to lift one of those guys earlier than he wanted to. But in this game 1 when everyone knew the Dodgers were going with a BP approach, starting with back to back LHHs was an unbelievably boneheaded dinosaur move. And it worked out exactly as I predicted moments after the lineup was posted.

    In the end, the Braves won because Fried is a stud, Riley came up big, and the Dodgers gave the Braves a free run and also ran themselves out of an inning on the bases. Let’s try to keep that in perspective while everyone is slapping themselves on the back and feeling good about decisions that were made. They haven’t even used their A squad yet, were coming off a huge series after a long flight East, and still almost won.

    Snits tactical ineptitude is still a very real problem. Of course, if Duvall runs into 3 bombs and 6 RBI it doesn’t really matter, but the problem is still real and is a disadvantage the Braves must overcome.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 10-17-2021 at 11:21 AM.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (10-17-2021), thethe (10-17-2021)

  5. #364
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,390
    Thanked in
    7,539 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AJonesATL View Post
    So what is everyone's thoughts sitting here today on going Anderson over Morton given this is actually a pretty significant and potentially series altering decision we've made.

    On one hand you could argue we are simply guaranteeing Anderson two starts in first 6 games over Morton. That logic would be easy. This is a mistake.

    On the other hand there is merit to 1.) extra rest for Morton after going on 3-days, 2.) keeping Anderson lined-up at home and 3.) staggering Morton to not go against scherzer - some might want our ace against him but could argue we are better off just increasing our odds in a game 3 vs. pitching Morton in a game where he's actually by a decent margin not the better pitcher. Effectively trying to avoid the scenario we had game 1 brewers where Morton is good but just gets outdueled and then we've burned him.

    If this goes well it would mean the Braves either win today (or if we lose its not Andersons doing i.e. he pitches well and we lose later in the game) and then we go into game 3 having Morton in a pivotal game.

    On the other hand, becomes painful if we lose in 6 and Morton was kept to one start.
    Anderson is very effective against opposite handed hitters, which makes it difficult to get any sort of platoon advantage.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  6. #365
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,027
    Thanked in
    6,130 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Anderson is very effective against opposite handed hitters, which makes it difficult to get any sort of platoon advantage.
    Anderson had a .318 xwOBA vs LHH this year. That is decidedly mediocre.

    We know the Dodgers are going to swap Pollock and Pujols for Bellinger and Lux. Everyone knows this now, so the Braves should be planning for it now. Not deciding what to do when the 5th inning rolls around…now.

    Ideally we want Matzek to face the middle of the Dodgers order the third time they bat. That’s when they will try to unwind the platoons to get Pujols and Pollock in to regain the platoon advantage. Since Matzek is the best overall BP arm, he needs to be pitching when that unwinding happens.

    This means Anderson goes through the lineup twice, and is maybe allowed to face Betts 3x. He should be pulled earlier if allowing the first non-Matzek arm out of the BP to face the pitchers spot prevents him from being forced into a bad matchup on his third batter faced. He should also be pulled a few batters early if his spot to bat comes up the half inning prior.

    All of these scenarios should be assessed and the decisions made now. There is no room for gut reaction moves in games this important.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 10-17-2021 at 11:41 AM.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (10-17-2021)

  8. #366
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,252
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,348
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,995
    Thanked in
    2,018 Posts
    I would imagine the third trip through the Dodgers’ order will start in the fifth, and given that Anderson goes deep into counts and the Dodgers’ lineup is usually good at working the count, I don’t see Anderson going past five either way. If we use Matzek that early, we just have to hope Minter and Chavez can help Jackson cover the remaining innings until hopefully Smith in the ninth. Unless we are somehow up 8-0, I’m on board with Matzek going through the meat of the order’s third time through.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to bravesnumberone For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (10-17-2021)

  10. #367
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,027
    Thanked in
    6,130 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesnumberone View Post
    I would imagine the third trip through the Dodgers’ order will start in the fifth, and given that Anderson goes deep into counts and the Dodgers’ lineup is usually good at working the count, I don’t see Anderson going past five either way. If we use Matzek that early, we just have to hope Minter and Chavez can help Jackson cover the remaining innings until hopefully Smith in the ninth. Unless we are somehow up 8-0, I’m on board with Matzek going through the meat of the order’s third time through.
    If it’s that early, and I think you’re correct that it probably will be, they should use someone like Chavez to get through J Turner before Matzek unwinds the platoons.

    That’s another scenario you were able to foresee, and hopefully snit was able to do the same.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (10-17-2021)

  12. #368
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,430
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,442
    Thanked in
    2,289 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Roberts did make a couple tactical mistakes.

    If Gonsolin was going to only get 5 outs, why was he allowed to hit rather than double switching when he came in? That mistake cost them a PA in a 1 run game.

    The biggest mistake was still snit putting Rosario and Freeman back to back when he knew the Dodgers were going to use the BP in game 1. He set them up to neutralize the 1-2 spots almost every single time through the order, and that’s exactly what the Dodgers did. Worst part about it was snit had days to make his terrible plan, and still came up with that horrible solution.

    When the Dodgers start Scherzer and Buehler it won’t be a big deal to stack Rosario and Freeman at the top because they will certainly each face those RHPs at least 2x, and it may force Roberts to lift one of those guys earlier than he wanted to. But in this game 1 when everyone knew the Dodgers were going with a BP approach, starting with back to back LHHs was an unbelievably boneheaded dinosaur move. And it worked out exactly as I predicted moments after the lineup was posted.

    In the end, the Braves won because Fried is a stud, Riley came up big, and the Dodgers gave the Braves a free run and also ran themselves out of an inning on the bases. Let’s try to keep that in perspective while everyone is slapping themselves on the back and feeling good about decisions that were made. They haven’t even used their A squad yet, were coming off a huge series after a long flight East, and still almost won.

    Snits tactical ineptitude is still a very real problem. Of course, if Duvall runs into 3 bombs and 6 RBI it doesn’t really matter, but the problem is still real and is a disadvantage the Braves must overcome.
    Leading off with Rosario did create a run in the first inning. I understand your general point as it did allow Robert to stack LHP against Freeman. Ideally Snitker would have replaced Rosario with Heredia at some point.

  13. #369
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,618
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,258
    Thanked in
    1,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AJonesATL View Post
    So what is everyone's thoughts sitting here today on going Anderson over Morton given this is actually a pretty significant and potentially series altering decision we've made.

    On one hand you could argue we are simply guaranteeing Anderson two starts in first 6 games over Morton. That logic would be easy. This is a mistake.

    On the other hand there is merit to 1.) extra rest for Morton after going on 3-days, 2.) keeping Anderson lined-up at home and 3.) staggering Morton to not go against scherzer - some might want our ace against him but could argue we are better off just increasing our odds in a game 3 vs. pitching Morton in a game where he's actually by a decent margin not the better pitcher. Effectively trying to avoid the scenario we had game 1 brewers where Morton is good but just gets outdueled and then we've burned him.

    If this goes well it would mean the Braves either win today (or if we lose its not Andersons doing i.e. he pitches well and we lose later in the game) and then we go into game 3 having Morton in a pivotal game.

    On the other hand, becomes painful if we lose in 6 and Morton was kept to one start.
    Well, lets Morton face the tough crowd in LA, and Anderson is much better at home than on the road. But as you said, if we lose in 6, and only have one Charlie start, that will be tough to stomach.

  14. #370
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,252
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,348
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,995
    Thanked in
    2,018 Posts
    If we fall down 2-1, we are going to have to think seriously about Fried going on three days’ rest. Can’t fall behind 3-1 and give them a closeout opportunity at home. Tonight isn’t a “must-win,” but it’s a must-win. Gives us so much more flexibility.

  15. #371
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesnumberone View Post
    If we fall down 2-1, we are going to have to think seriously about Fried going on three days’ rest. Can’t fall behind 3-1 and give them a closeout opportunity at home. Tonight isn’t a “must-win,” but it’s a must-win. Gives us so much more flexibility.
    The history is that short rest pitchers look like 4th or fifth starters on average.

    The most obvious outliers I can think of off the top of my head were dominant hard stuff guys but I don't think Fried really qualifies.

    Short rest is usually pretty desperate move.

  16. #372
    NL Rookie of the Year CrazyTrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    57
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    245
    Thanked in
    191 Posts
    Horrible AB by Arcia.

  17. #373
    NL Rookie of the Year CrazyTrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    57
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    245
    Thanked in
    191 Posts
    **** YES!!!

  18. #374
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,528
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,041
    Thanked in
    5,520 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyTrain View Post
    **** YES!!!
    Dude, get in the game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •