Chick-fil-A Giving Free Food to Stranded Motorists

[sturg33]

This hateful bigots!!!

Link

[jpx7]

Charity and bigotry are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

[drewdat]

"Coexist bumper sticker? Next."

[sturg33]

Charity and bigotry are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Until there is evidence that they won't serve someone who is ***, they are not in the least bit bigoted

[zitothebrave]

Charity and bigotry are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Yeah I have no clue what sturg is going for at the top.

[zitothebrave]

Until there is evidence that they won't serve someone who is ***, they are not in the least bit bigoted

WTF? For real? Donating to causes that specifically lobby to turn ***s straight or fight *** marriage isn't bigoted? They stopped doing that for a reason

[sturg33]

WTF? For real? Donating to causes that specifically lobby to turn ***s straight or fight *** marriage isn't bigoted? They stopped doing that for a reason

I went to chick-fil-a with my *** friend the other day. We were served with a hearty smile.

You'd think they would have kicked him out of the store.

[The Chosen One]

I went to chick-fil-a with my *** friend the other day. We were served with a hearty smile.

You'd think they would have kicked him out of the store.

I think most people are aware it's the upper hierarchy that feels that way, as the chances of your cashier being under the age of 30 at Chick Fil A are pretty strong.

Also, how *** is your *** friend on the flamboyancy scale? I have a *** friend and you'd never know he was *** unless he told you he only was interested in guys.

[gilesfan]

Chick fila is the best. Their culture destroys it's competition. Nice to see them doing these type of things

[Tapate50]

How dare the founders have an opinion! Never mind all the good they do! Burn em at the stake!

[Tapate50]

Chick fila is the best. Their culture destroys it's competition. Nice to see them doing these type of things

Pretty much spot on

[CK86]

Chik-fil-a is delicious. That is all.

[jpx7]

Until there is evidence that they won't serve someone who is ***, they are not in the least bit bigoted

I don't think you understand the concept.

[sturg33]

I don't think you understand the concept.

Help me understand... If you think someone who believes marriage should be between 1 man and 1 woman is automatically a bigot, then there's no point to discuss further with you.

They have a personal opinion. They do not discriminate against anybody in their business. That should be fine for everyone.

[zitothebrave]

Help me understand... If you think someone who believes marriage should be between 1 man and 1 woman is automatically a bigot, then there's no point to discuss further with you.

They have a personal opinion. They do not discriminate against anybody in their business. That should be fine for everyone.

But it's not that simple. They are not just having an opinion but taking money from the company and donating it to anti-*** causes. This isn't simply the owner having an opinion, but the owner taking money from the company and giving it to anti-*** groups.

[gilesfan]

But it's not that simple. They are not just having an opinion but taking money from the company and donating it to anti-*** causes. This isn't simply the owner having an opinion, but the owner taking money from the company and giving it to anti-*** groups.

Im sure there are poor people that are anti-*** that you want me to give more of my money too, right? Or is money out of my pocket just going to hard working, church going, angels?

[zitothebrave]

Im sure there are poor people that are anti-*** that you want me to give more of my money too, right? Or is money out of my pocket just going to hard working, church going, angels?

What the **** are you talking out of your ass about this time?

[jpx7]

Help me understand... If you think someone who believes marriage should be between 1 man and 1 woman is automatically a bigot, then there's no point to discuss further with you.

They have a personal opinion. They do not discriminate against anybody in their business. That should be fine for everyone.

Bigotry does not equate to, nor necessarily presuppose, discrimination. If person-a harbors ill-will, malice, or hatred towards a homosexual simply as a result of the homosexuality of person-b, person-a is still guilty of bigotry; good on person-a—and I mean this seriously—for not actively, much less criminally, discriminating against person-b, but that doesn't obviate person-a's prejudice, it just means its inactive.

[zitothebrave]

JPX is fly like paper gets high like plane.

[sturg33]

Bigotry does not equate to, nor necessarily presuppose, discrimination. If person-a harbors ill-will, malice, or hatred towards a homosexual simply as a result of the homosexuality of person-b, person-a is still guilty of bigotry; good on person-a—and I mean this seriously—for not actively, much less criminally, discriminating against person-b, but that doesn't obviate person-a's prejudice, it just means its inactive.

Could I make the same argument that person a is a bigot since he wants person b to pay more taxes, simply as a result of person b having more money?