Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: Deferred money deferential

  1. #41
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    A bankruptcy court judge in his courtroom is closest thing we have to a king in the US. The court could literally ignore MLB's attempt to force a sale if it wanted to. If it was a Chapter 11 and the team intended to come out of the bankruptcy a going concern, you could see plan that pays deferred money at pennies on the dollar.

    Is this likely? No. Most likely MLB would force a sale of a team well before it entered into bankruptcy. If a team did somehow end up in bankruptcy, MLB would still have options. For example, MLB could buy the debt from the creditors. Offer them face value and they'd jump at it. MLB would then likely be able to end up owning the restructured team which it would then sell.

    Still, it's fun to think of a scenario where these deferred money schemes blow up in the faces of those involved.
    I agree with this analysis. Ohtani is actually taking an unsecured promise to pay instead of current compensation and if it were secured he would be currently taxed. The tradeoff is that if the promisor (the business) goes under, the deferred comp participant waits in line with the rest of the general creditors and, as you say, theoretically could receive pennies on the dollar. An arranged marriage with a new owner is a more probable result.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  3. #42
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    I agree with this analysis. Ohtani is actually taking an unsecured promise to pay instead of current compensation and if it were secured he would be currently taxed. The tradeoff is that if the promisor (the business) goes under, the deferred comp participant waits in line with the rest of the general creditors and, as you say, theoretically could receive pennies on the dollar. An arranged marriage with a new owner is a more probable result.
    Fairly low risk that the Dodgers have solvency issues to begin with.

  4. #43
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Fairly low risk that the Dodgers have solvency issues to begin with.
    True, as long as they're controlled by Guggenheim, for whom they're almost a toy. It's worth pointing out that the team filed Chapter 11 as recently as 2011, though that was under Frank McCourt's stewardship. And when he sold the next year, he got $2.1 billion for the club. So despite having significant value, the asset's cash flow was insufficient.

    What we're talking about are fairly substantial future obligations that they can plan for and that they have the advantage of the time value of money. But, they're in essence mortgaging the 2030s. They're betting they can outrun the debt, and as you say, they probably can. But it's a gamble.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  6. #44
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,478
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,099
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,713
    Thanked in
    3,899 Posts
    Or bankroll that increase in merch and intl exposure
    Ivermectin Man

  7. #45
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    I would be surprised--but not shocked--if the Braves went down this road to some extent given the success of The Battery. I don't know there's a lot of cash sitting around or whether it's wise to bet on the long-term future of commercial real estate, but it's certainly something would mitigate risk for a contract with a ton of money deferred.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  9. #46
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,252
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    954
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    691
    Thanked in
    488 Posts
    Doesn’t the contractual obligation make it essentially secured rather than unsecured?

    The contract means they can’t just decide not to pay.

  10. #47
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mfree80 View Post
    Doesn’t the contractual obligation make it essentially secured rather than unsecured?

    The contract means they can’t just decide not to pay.
    The second statement is true but the first is not. There’s no identified account that they can point to and say they have a superior right to other creditors. So they have a contract, Ohtani or another deferred player has the ability to compel payment through a judgement if necessary….but they have no primacy versus any other creditor.

    The Dodgers could build an account for Ohtani and lose it to tort, contract or bankruptcy, leaving Ohtani in the cold.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  12. #48
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mfree80 View Post
    Doesn’t the contractual obligation make it essentially secured rather than unsecured?

    The contract means they can’t just decide not to pay.
    Secured means there is a lien or other priority interest on specific property.

    A contract gives legal recourse to the parties, but if we are talking bankruptcy may not be much obstacle.

  13. #49
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,206
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Secured means there is a lien or other priority interest on specific property.

    A contract gives legal recourse to the parties, but if we are talking bankruptcy may not be much obstacle.
    As a lawyer, this is correct.

    People tend to think baseball contracts have more authority because they're written and have all sorts of stuff in them. But when it comes to getting paid in bankruptcy, your average plumber probably has more recourse than an MLB star.

    But this is academic. It's hard to imagine a situation where MLB lets it happen.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (12-14-2023), jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  15. #50
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    As a lawyer, this is correct.

    People tend to think baseball contracts have more authority because they're written and have all sorts of stuff in them. But when it comes to getting paid in bankruptcy, your average plumber probably has more recourse than an MLB star.

    But this is academic. It's hard to imagine a situation where MLB lets it happen.
    Posted at 2:55 in the morning. New fatherhood keeping you up? Don't worry. You can still get 8 hours sleep. It just takes 12 hours to get it.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023), striker42 (12-14-2023)

  17. #51
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,741
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,432
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    As a lawyer, this is correct.

    People tend to think baseball contracts have more authority because they're written and have all sorts of stuff in them. But when it comes to getting paid in bankruptcy, your average plumber probably has more recourse than an MLB star.

    But this is academic. It's hard to imagine a situation where MLB lets it happen.
    Correct, MLB wouldn't let a team go bankrupt, the owners can go bankrupt, but they'd force the sale of the team or take it over. See Mets, Rangers, and Expos. The Wilpons nearly went bankrupt and were threatened to because of the Madoff stuff, Rangers went bankrupt and sold, and part of the sale was covering salaries (A-Rod to name one) MLB stepped in to facilitate the sale which made sure those were covered, Expos fell into financial hell and MLB took over the team from Loria before selling it and moving to Washington.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to zitothebrave For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (12-14-2023)

  19. #52
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,206
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    Posted at 2:55 in the morning. New fatherhood keeping you up? Don't worry. You can still get 8 hours sleep. It just takes 12 hours to get it.
    Hit the nail on the head. The little Striker doesn't care much for sleep.

  20. #53
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    True, as long as they're controlled by Guggenheim, for whom they're almost a toy. It's worth pointing out that the team filed Chapter 11 as recently as 2011, though that was under Frank McCourt's stewardship. And when he sold the next year, he got $2.1 billion for the club. So despite having significant value, the asset's cash flow was insufficient.

    What we're talking about are fairly substantial future obligations that they can plan for and that they have the advantage of the time value of money. But, they're in essence mortgaging the 2030s. They're betting they can outrun the debt, and as you say, they probably can. But it's a gamble.
    I grew up in a farming community and while I have taken numerous economics courses, there are some simple maxims and one is even if you are sitting on a gold mine, if you haven't got the cash flow to maintain your capital, things get crappy in a hurry.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    GovClintonTyree (12-14-2023), jpx7 (12-14-2023)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •