Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 41

Thread: Albies to the IL

  1. #21
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,664
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,923
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    223
    Thanked in
    149 Posts
    Awwwww.

  2. #22
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,864
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    29
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    901
    Thanked in
    600 Posts
    I guess Wall will be heading to AAA shortly

  3. #23
    Hysterical Girlfriend
    That Storms Out and
    Returns the Next Day
    mossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,137
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    890
    Thanked in
    455 Posts
    Yet...
    Another series win against a good team
    One of the best records in the NL
    This Lopez kid is most impressive
    So much good also going on.

    Rest up Ozzie.

  4. #24
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,287
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mossy View Post
    Yet...
    Another series win against a good team
    The best record in the majors
    This Lopez kid is most impressive
    So much good also going on.

    Rest up Ozzie.
    Fixed it for you!

  5. #25
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,519
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,034
    Thanked in
    6,136 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    If Snit had given him a day off he would have dodged that pitch.
    Decent attempt at a burn.

    Had Guillorme played a little before this injury he might be better positioned to actually contribute in the first 1-2 weeks. As it currently stands he will be in ST mode for at least a week after rotting on the bench.

    But yeah, snit is awesome. Those people skills are unparalleled.

  6. #26
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,578
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,052
    Thanked in
    5,526 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Decent attempt at a burn.

    Had Guillorme played a little before this injury he might be better positioned to actually contribute in the first 1-2 weeks. As it currently stands he will be in ST mode for at least a week after rotting on the bench.

    But yeah, snit is awesome. Those people skills are unparalleled.
    This is Luis Guillorme we’re talking about here. No amount of work is going to make him contribute with the bat.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to CyYoung31 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (04-19-2024)

  8. #27
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,502
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,102
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,715
    Thanked in
    3,901 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    This is Luis Guillorme we’re talking about here. No amount of work is going to make him contribute with the bat.
    You don’t understand regular season mode vs spring training mode obvs. There’s another level to Guillorme
    Last edited by Tapate50; 04-18-2024 at 07:08 AM.
    Ivermectin Man

  9. #28
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,414
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,512
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,832
    Thanked in
    2,741 Posts
    If a few at bats helps him that much he is going to be a beast from all this playing time from Albies being on the DL. We have all stars all over the field. It's 3 weeks into the season and we had 2 straight days off before this stretch of games. We don't need to be giving all stars days off so a scrub can get at bats. For all we know those rest games could be forced on us by injury like with Albies. We don't have many old players who need days off. We really don't even need pinch hitters anymore with the pitcher not batting and no black holes in the lineup..... Except when our bench players start due to injury.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  10. #29
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,519
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,034
    Thanked in
    6,136 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    This is Luis Guillorme we’re talking about here. No amount of work is going to make him contribute with the bat.
    Even you can understand a rusty bad hitter is worse than a non-rusty bad hitter.

  11. #30
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,414
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,512
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,832
    Thanked in
    2,741 Posts
    Whats better? An all star caliber hitter or Guillorme with a bat in his hands? The downgrade from playing Guillorme so he wont be "rusty" when he does play isnt worth the loss in offense for the game he would have subbed for a healthy player.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  12. #31
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,352
    Thanked in
    3,371 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Whats better? An all star caliber hitter or Guillorme with a bat in his hands? The downgrade from playing Guillorme so he wont be "rusty" when he does play isnt worth the loss in offense for the game he would have subbed for a healthy player.
    you do realize that the Braves have won all three games that Ozzie has been out. Not that they don't miss him, but that no one player is the only reason we win. Giving guys days off so role players can stay sharp is not going to cost this team any wins...
    Coppy

  13. #32
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,519
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,034
    Thanked in
    6,136 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Whats better? An all star caliber hitter or Guillorme with a bat in his hands? The downgrade from playing Guillorme so he wont be "rusty" when he does play isnt worth the loss in offense for the game he would have subbed for a healthy player.
    This is the type of short sighted view I expect Dino-Snit takes. Yes, he takes a 1 game hit in performance at 1 spot in the order, and if the dozen braincells he is rubbing together can only comprehend that much of the world, then sitting a guy 1 extra day per month is nothing but a negative.

    However, allowing a few more braincells into the mix lets you realize you gain:

    - A more rested star who is less likely to get injured in a fatigue related play, usually soft tissue injuries. This is quite literally what load management is.
    - A bench player who gets 3-4 starts per month who is now more ready to step in if needed, rather than needed a ST period for 1-2 weeks to ramp up.
    - A selling point to future bench players that this team doesn't let guys rot away for months on end.
    - A platoon advantage in the games you selectively allow these bench players to play. Grichuk vs a LHP isn't such a huge downgrade, for example.

    So yeah, I would think the benefits of letting the primary bench IFer get 3-4 starts a month at the expense of 1 start per month from Riley/Arcia/Albies/Olson is probably a worthwhile trade to get all those listed benefits.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 04-18-2024 at 01:15 PM.

  14. #33
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,411
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,764
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Even you can understand a rusty bad hitter is worse than a non-rusty bad hitter.
    The difference is likely to be negligible at best and more likely it will have no difference at all. Bad hitters are bad hitters and no amount of consistent work is going to drastically affect the outcome of their performance.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (04-19-2024)

  16. #34
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,411
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,764
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Baseball players are notoriously routine fixated. Many players don't take days off, not out of some outdated macho mantra, but because they don't want to get out of rhythm.

    Some players need days off. Some don't. It's the managers job to decide who that is. In the end, the players know their own bodies better than we ever could.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (04-19-2024), Mrs. Meta (04-18-2024)

  18. #35
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,352
    Thanked in
    3,371 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Baseball players are notoriously routine fixated. Many players don't take days off, not out of some outdated macho mantra, but because they don't want to get out of rhythm.

    Some players need days off. Some don't. It's the managers job to decide who that is. In the end, the players know their own bodies better than we ever could.
    isn't a managers job to win a world series or at least put your team in the best position to win a world series. And if the current playoff structure is the way it is, a lot of days off, wouldn't it be prudent for said manager to actually lead and re-condition these bodies to adjust to time off?

    I honestly can't see why anyone would ever argue for a manager NOT to rest players on a regular basis.
    Coppy

  19. #36
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,411
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,764
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    isn't a managers job to win a world series or at least put your team in the best position to win a world series. And if the current playoff structure is the way it is, a lot of days off, wouldn't it be prudent for said manager to actually lead and re-condition these bodies to adjust to time off?

    I honestly can't see why anyone would ever argue for a manager NOT to rest players on a regular basis.
    It's not about their bodily condition necessarily. A player's timing can get thrown off by taking time off. Their focus can lapse.

    It isn't as black and white as you are making this out to be. Players have their own personalities and their own preferences. Interfering too much with that is likely to create more issues than you are really saving.

  20. #37
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,519
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,034
    Thanked in
    6,136 Posts
    Yes, I’m sure the Braves managed to build a roster of guys who need to play 160 to stay in a rhythm. Those guys just somehow magically congregated on this roster.

    I’m sure Dino-snit, revered by all for his supernatural people management skills, is powerless to convince these players a little extra rest would benefit the team as a whole. There’s no way even the best people person on the planet can combat the forces of nature responsible for these Ironman players coming together in the city of Atlanta.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    SoCalDawg (04-19-2024)

  22. #38
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,411
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,764
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Yes, I’m sure the Braves managed to build a roster of guys who need to play 160 to stay in a rhythm. Those guys just somehow magically congregated on this roster.

    I’m sure Dino-snit, revered by all for his supernatural people management skills, is powerless to convince these players a little extra rest would benefit the team as a whole. There’s no way even the best people person on the planet can combat the forces of nature responsible for these Ironman players coming together in the city of Atlanta.
    Is that what I said?

  23. #39
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,519
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,034
    Thanked in
    6,136 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    The difference is likely to be negligible at best and more likely it will have no difference at all. Bad hitters are bad hitters and no amount of consistent work is going to drastically affect the outcome of their performance.
    Yeah, Guillorme is a career .260/.343/.332 hitter. We definitely don't care if he's a .200/.200/.300 hitter for 2 weeks while he gets back to being a .260/.343/.332 hitter. It's probably fine to have that .500 OPS in the lineup for 10+ games rather than that .675 OPS simply because they didn't want to give him 3-4 starts per month.

    We definitely don't want to see the star with a career OPS of .758 vs RHP rested once a month so the bench player with a career OPS vs RHP of .704 can get some PAs to stay fresh. It would be catastrophic to drop from a .758 OPS to a .704 OPS for one game to help prevent that .675 OPS bench player from being a .500 OPS bench player if forced into action. Nevermind the other points listed above...that 50 point drop in OPS for 1 game is insurmountable.

    There is simply no way to solve this dilemma, so they may as well just let the bench player rot and suffer with the .500 OPS for a couple weeks. Oh well, I guess some problems are simply unsolvable. Just keep using the sharpie to fill out the lineup and cuddle up for the nightly nap.

  24. #40
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,511
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,411
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,764
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Yeah, Guillorme is a career .260/.343/.332 hitter. We definitely don't care if he's a .200/.200/.300 hitter for 2 weeks while he gets back to being a .260/.343/.332 hitter. It's probably fine to have that .500 OPS in the lineup for 10+ games rather than that .675 OPS simply because they didn't want to give him 3-4 starts per month.

    We definitely don't want to see the star with a career OPS of .758 vs RHP rested once a month so the bench player with a career OPS vs RHP of .704 can get some PAs to stay fresh. It would be catastrophic to drop from a .758 OPS to a .704 OPS for one game to help prevent that .675 OPS bench player from being a .500 OPS bench player if forced into action. Nevermind the other points listed above...that 50 point drop in OPS for 1 game is insurmountable.

    There is simply no way to solve this dilemma, so they may as well just let the bench player rot and suffer with the .500 OPS for a couple weeks. Oh well, I guess some problems are simply unsolvable. Just keep using the sharpie to fill out the lineup and cuddle up for the nightly nap.
    You really gonna support your position based on 10 PAs? If Ozzie comes back and Guillmore only has 2 at bats in 3 weeks but they are both homers, I assume I can come back here and rub it in your face?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •