link
As the implementation date for Seattle’s strict $15 per hour minimum wage law approaches, the city is experiencing a rising trend in restaurant closures. The tough new law goes into effect April 1st.
The closings have occurred across the city, from Grub in the upscale Queen Anne Hill neighborhood, to Little Uncle in gritty Pioneer Square, to the Boat Street Cafe on Western Avenue near the waterfront.
The shut-downs have idled dozens of low-wage workers, the very people advocates say the wage law is supposed to help. Instead of delivering the promised “living wage” of $15 an hour, economic realities created by the new law have dropped the hourly wage for these workers to zero.
Restaurants close for many reasons, but Seattle has an added a unique factor. Seattle Magazine reports, “...another major factor affecting restaurant futures in our city is the impending minimum wage hike to $15 per hour.” About 36% of restaurant earnings go to paying labor costs.
Advocates of a high minimum wage said businesses would simply pay the mandated wage out of profits, raising earnings for workers. Restaurants operate on thin margins, though, with average profits of 4% or less, and the business is highly competitive.
When prices rise consumers seek alternatives, a behavior economists call the “substitution effect,” which results in lower demand for the higher-priced product. In the case of restaurants, consumers have access to the ultimate substitution – they can stay home.
The Seattle Times and Seattle Eater magazine have reported on some of the ways restaurant owners have tried to adapt – higher menu prices, cheaper, lower-quality ingredients, reduced opening times, and cutting work hours and firing workers. Sometimes these strategies, even in combination, are not enough. The business closes, workers lose their jobs and the neighborhood loses a prized amenity.
---------------------------------
$7-8/hr might not be a "living wage," but is $0/hr a "living wage?"
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by sturg33
