Hastert - Legitimate Scandal

[57Brave]

There were no lengthy Congressional Hearings or Commissions.
No one has referred to him as untrustworthy or disgusting

This was (R) response to Bob Livingston not being up to the task to over see the Clinton Impeachment.
Which too, was an empty witch hunt

Read below:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/16/us...=top-news&_r=0

During one meeting, Mr. Hastert agreed to pay his former student $3.5 million to “compensate for and conceal” his misconduct, the indictment said. Soon after, it continued, Mr. Hastert began taking out large sums of money from several accounts and paying Individual A in amounts of $50,000 or $100,000.

[57Brave]

and, it didn't take a doctored video

or a clandestine fake interview

or a TV network to wash,rinse repeat

[sturg33]

and, it didn't take a doctored video

or a clandestine fake interview

or a TV network to wash,rinse repeat

You mind showing which parts of the video were "doctored" ...

I'm specifically curious if the part where the lady was negotiating body part prices was "doctored."

Thanks in advance

[Runnin]

"After leaving Congress, Mr. Hastert parlayed his time as speaker into a lucrative career, starting a lobbying firm and later working at Dickstein Shapiro, a Washington law firm. "

In fiction that would be too obvious.

[ESP47]

You mind showing which parts of the video were "doctored" ...

I'm specifically curious if the part where the lady was negotiating body part prices was "doctored."

Thanks in advance

The condescending tone that's in basically every single one of your posts....never gets old. Life might be more enjoyable if you just discussed matters instead of trying to "win" every conversation you've ever had.

[sturg33]

The condescending tone that's in basically every single one of your posts....never gets old. Life might be more enjoyable if you just discussed matters instead of trying to "win" every conversation you've ever had.

Our friend 57 is the most arrogant of all, and continues to assert doctored videos... I've asked the question several times but can't seem to get answer from him

[57Brave]

If you're asking if I've seen the video's, no.
If you're asking if I will see the videos, no+++

Sturg, this is not new and you know it is not new.+
I mean, this was the shiney thing 2 months ago

This is the second time I've brought this report from August.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/28/us...deos.html?_r=0


this is why your HC went up 79%. Because you only read the first paragraph then start typing

[57Brave]

every discussion on this board has begun to revolve around abortion and the inflammatory rhetoric that ,I don't even know what to call them anymore, the fanatics attach to the topic. I started this thread about scandals and false issues. Which, like it or not the videos are. A false issue brought to light by deceit. Not sure what HRC scandal rises to the level of peddling false hoods the "zealots" snap into line to.
Most Planned Parenthood patients would vote which party ? And is it the party looking to make financial gain thru deregulation ?
Just askin

[57Brave]

" It's a disgrace and a scandal."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1...red-Top-Secret


////////////////

" These guys have been getting away with so much for so long, perhaps they even started to believe their own line of bull. But their actions—the focus on interviewing people connected to Hillary Clinton, the incessant leaking, the lying—showed what the real story was all along. Now the media is noticing, and the Republicans don't have much more than "believe us because we say so."

[AerchAngel]

every discussion on this board has begun to revolve around abortion and the inflammatory rhetoric that ,I don't even know what to call them anymore, the fanatics attach to the topic. I started this thread about scandals and false issues. Which, like it or not the videos are. A false issue brought to light by deceit. Not sure what HRC scandal rises to the level of peddling false hoods the "zealots" snap into line to.
Most Planned Parenthood patients would vote which party ? And is it the party looking to make financial gain thru deregulation ?
Just askin

Because what you are asking is a witch hunt and a moot point. He is guilty, no one is going to defend him. Trying to tie this with something else is your version of reaching. No one is going to defend Hastert.

Parenthood was guilty and now they can't get money. They can still murder with their hearts content which a few on this board have no problem with they just can't profit from it.

[AerchAngel]

So when you quit covering and lying for the Democratic wussies you follow like a sheep then I will quit making you look like an idiot for defending them.

[57Brave]

The Rude Pundit ‏@rudepundit 4m4 minutes ago

You know when it might have been nice to have this Bush and 9/11 argument? Like starting on 9/12/01.

[Garmel]

Special Sauce, you do know that the forensics team that says this was a bunch of edited lies is a democrat funded organization, right? Do you also know that another forensics team(an independent firm called Coalfire) has cleared CMP of any wrongdoing?

[Hawk]

Special Sauce, you do know that the forensics team that says this was a bunch of edited lies is a democrat funded organization, right? Do you also know that another forensics team(an independent firm called Coalfire) has cleared CMP of any wrongdoing?

Yes, we told him this several months ago but I guess it's not convenient information to the angle he's desperately trying to work.

[zitothebrave]

Special Sauce, you do know that the forensics team that says this was a bunch of edited lies is a democrat funded organization, right? Do you also know that another forensics team(an independent firm called Coalfire) has cleared CMP of any wrongdoing?

Decided to do a little bit of digging. Only sites calling Coalfire independent and Fusion GPS democrats were conservative rags (read Breitbart et al)

Citing the Breitbart article on this there's a massive logical consistency flaw

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...eos-authentic/

“The Coalfire report also confirmed that one segment of missing video highlighted by the Fusion Report was later uplaoaded in full to CMP’s YouTube page,”

So removing conversations from their chronological order as well. The evidence for them is basically

"Coalfire concluded that the “raw footage” provided by CMP “show no sign evidence of manipulation or editing. This conclusion is supported by the consistency of the video file date and time stamps, the video timecode, as well as the folder a file-naming scheme. The uniformity between the footage from the cameras from the two investigators also support the evidence that the video recordings are authentic.” "

Seriously, listing file date and timestamps is hardly anything substantial

http://www.howtogeek.com/203154/how-...s-and-folders/

I'm not saying anything like these conversations never happened, this was a clear hit piece with editing that conveyed the mood/point that CMP wanted to get across. This wasn't an expose, it was a documentary at best.

[57Brave]

Downing Street memos intimated as much.

[57Brave]

I find Laura Bush's shoes and sensually handling Tony Blair a scandal

[Hawk]

Downing Street memos intimated as much.

Context.

Why was the document on Hillary's private 'e-mail' server?

[57Brave]

what oceans ?

[57Brave]

on this day of emails,Benghazi and the pilloring of HRC
wondering if we can get a committee investigation and publicity to look at this
?
my thoughts are the cover up of the rising seas and lack of oversight industrial revolution residue
constitutes a, scandal. That will effect our grandchildren.

Sweeping study claims that rising temperatures will sharply cut economic productivity
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/e...-productivity/