Originally Posted by
nsacpi
When considering who we might pick up, there are three relevant questions:
1) If Simmons were to go down, would the candidate be preferred to current in-house alternatives
2) If Chris Johnson were to go down, would the candidate be preferred to in-house alternatives
3) If Uggla goes down or continues to slump severely, would the candidate be preferred to in-house alternatives
In thinking about these questions, it occurs to me that our biggest vulnerability in the infield that might be addressed by an acquisition is Chris Johnson going down. The loss of Pena and trade of Francisco have really reduced our depth behind Johnson. It might explain why Pastornicky made a rare start at third in Gwinnett last week.
Any late needs are going to be strictly positional. We don't have issues as far as pinch hitting. Johnson, Gattis, Terdoslavich and Schafer have the pinch hitting part taken care of. I don't see a late acquisition improving on those four as far a pinch hitting goes.