Call me when they're "desperate" - especially on December 1st.
Given the fact that their front office is as creative as any out there, does anyone really believe that they think the sun sets with Shelby Miller and that they can't find a way to trade for another similar (or better) Pitcher without giving up Seager? Seriously? The same people here that thought four years of Miller was a *hitty return for one year of Jason Heyward now think three years of him would be a fair return for Corey Seager?
Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...
Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?
Oklahomahawk (12-01-2015)
I have said there is no chance Seager for Miller would happen. I know that.. even in desperation, the Dodgers are not fools.. But as time ticks and FA get signed their desperation will grow. I said they may relax more on Pederson or Urais. personally would prefer Joc.. But only time will tell.. if they get Price or Zack, then I don't think they make a good trade partner. If the best they get is Shark, then I laugh if they think they can compete with Kershaw/Anderson/wood/shark/??? rotation...
You agreed we should be prepared to be disappointed because none of the guys we've traded for have proven themselves yet...but they're prospects still, so of course they haven't proven themselves. Why would that be a reason to be disappointed? If they had all had bad years and regressed as prospects, that's one thing. But that's not what has happened here.
Most of baseball has believed we've gotten the better end of just about every deal we've made so far. Yet we have fans who think these trades are all terrible.
It's exactly why I'm trying to prepare people for the reality that guys like Seager and Urias are untouchable, especially for a guy like Miller. When you don't have a realistic view of the situation, you end up with conclusions that are off-base.
I believe Austin Meadows would be available. Especially with how crowded the Pirates outfield is. I'd be more inclined to trade Teheran for him.
Horsehide Harry (12-01-2015)
Then what in the world does 'unique apex' mean? Because his value could easily increase from where it is now. I get that there's a chance he could also regress, but that is not an apex under any circumstances.
And I haven't made an evaluation on Seager; I'm just telling you that the Dodgers aren't going to deal him. Because they're not. Again, you can call them stupid for that if you want, but it's reality.
Top prospects sometimes bust (though much more rarely than guys below them), but they also sometimes become complete beasts. Hardly any team is ever going to give up a potential beast before they're more sure of what they have, and while his value is still somewhat held back.
If a team just kept trading its top prospects because they were at a 'unique apex' and there was a chance they might bust, that team would end up terrible pretty quickly.
It's fine to dream on Seager but you all need to realize there is zero chance the Dodgers or any team would trade him for Shelby Miller. And that's not even close to a knock on Shelby.
clvclv (12-01-2015)
Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...
Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?