Are liberals just more comfortable prosecuting black males for sexual abuse of women than rich white guys. Liberals are the party of old white women!
Are liberals just more comfortable prosecuting black males for sexual abuse of women than rich white guys. Liberals are the party of old white women!
Last edited by VOLracious; 01-07-2016 at 02:19 AM.
what a weird ****ing forum that you tried to hotlink from
btw, those pics didn't show up for us
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
The Cosby vs. Clinton stories and how Clinton supporters react to each is truly fascinating.
Absolutely no comparison. But I'm not fascinated by the delusion of those who think there is.Originally Posted by BedellBrave
Got to love "absolutes!" Sure there's a comparison. No need for hyperbole. Both men are famous and have at least been well loved. Both men are powerful. Both men are horn-dogs - adulterers. Both men have been accused of sexual harassment and of rape. Both have abused their position of power over a younger woman or women.
Last edited by BedellBrave; 01-07-2016 at 03:36 PM.
When did you become a Trump man ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Clinton is/was a scumbag, But he was never accused of rape by 20 some odd women.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
50PoundHead (01-07-2016), jpx7 (01-08-2016)
Maybe he's not a serial rapist but it doesn't mean he's not a rapist
this post is a waste of a few bits on the server.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
So zito is in favor of rape as long as you don't rape 20 some odd women. Glad to know.
No, you're accusing someone of something that there's pretty much no evidence of.
Clinton had one rape allegation, that's it.
What you're basically saying i sthat anyone could be guilty of a crime. Marco Rubio isn't a serial movie theater masturbator, but it doesn't mean he's not a movie theater masturbator.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
That's one more than I have ever had. Bill Clinton used his power to abuse women. There's a very thin line between coercion and rape.
There's a very thick line. I'm guessing Clinton abused it a few times. But he has never been accused for drugging people and raping them. Cosby had an MO. Unfortunately for Clinton's accuser, everyone else that accused Clinton was likely making things up. So her case gets a shadow of a doubt. And she unfortunately doesn't have any corroborating witnesses and no one saw Clinton at her hotel and no one even had records of her being there. Again, I'm not defending Clinton, but he and Cosby aren't even remotely comparable. If it comes out that he raped tons of women, then you have a point. Otherwise it's one person and your speculation.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
I'm not saying that Clinton is as bad as Cosby but Vol's original question stands.
Well let me answer it for both of you because ****, you don't understand much of anything.
Arkansas's statute of limitation for rape is a few years. No limit with DNA evidence which I'm gonna assume there is none.
The rape happened in the late 70s, she didn't come out to talk about it until the late 90s.
So he's not being indicted because she didn't go to the police in the time she needed to for him to stand trial.
It's really quite simple.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Like I said, truly fascinating.
Both are men. Both live on planet earth. Both seem to like women. Okay, I agree. The comparisons are endless.
Clinton is a cad with an appetite for younger women, has been in a position to take advantage of it and has been accused of rape. Maybe he raped those women. While I tend to believe the women in these situations, he must have learned his lesson somewhere along the way. The Lewinsky scandal was just terrible judgement and lack of control.
Cosby's accusers tell much more disturbing stories, imo.
Why must he have learned his lesson? Flying around with Epstein sure doesn't make him look like he has.
Oh, and it wasn't just the young ones horn-dog Clinton hit up on, didn't he go after Jackie-O as well?
Even reading WaPo's "fact checker" is fascinating. The last paragraph's a hoot. Link
Last edited by BedellBrave; 01-07-2016 at 11:21 PM.
He's a cad, but he doesn't abuse women. If he did there would be more substantial accusations, especially by now.
Cosby, on the other hand, is positively diabolical.
One would think with all of these allegations vs Bill Clinton they would have tried impeachment
Last edited by 57Brave; 01-08-2016 at 09:12 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote