Found it. Both agreed that Maitan was better.
http://mlb.mlb.com/fan_forum/podcast...t=mlb_pipeline
Podcast from 5/5/16 and time 4:45 ish..
They said, "It's hard to compare, but.. I don't see that potential bat...nobody int he draft that combines Maitan's offensive potential." They said that when he compared to infielders..
and they said in another podcast which I'm too lazy to look for right now that they'd take him #1.
chop2chip (06-16-2016)
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"- Tom Waits
chop2chip (06-16-2016)
but i said the type of hitter he will be,which I think is in the Pedroia type #2 guy. I never said anything about his defense or positioning and I can comp any bloody way i see fit, I think too many of you think the methd of the "scouts" you like is the only way to judge players. hint: it isn't
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"- Tom Waits
chop2chip (06-16-2016)
Also, chop2chip.. I'm listening to the interview, but I'm really not seeing where Callis is saying that "Moniak is better than Maitan" or "Maitan wouldn't be the top prospect.."
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"- Tom Waits
bravescountry (06-16-2016)
I know it has nothing to do with this situation. But that just reminds me of when Marte was like 20 and thought of as the next Mike Schmidt and people stated he would easily go #1 at that years draft if he was coming out of college.
I know some people look at his possible ceiling and say 'Yes I want him and would easily draft him #1 if given the chance'. But the bust rate for Matian is SO much higher than someone like Senzel that I could certainly see someone opting for a 'safer' route. And that's not to take anything away from either player. But even the age difference from 16 to 18 when US players get drafted is huge. And it's much easier to get a gauge of a players abilities in the states than it is overseas.
Again that's not to say that Matian isn't an incredible talent and who wouldn't want him. He's the obvious #1 guy in this years talent pool. But for every Felix Herandez who is pimped as the **** in a given year there are several Wilson Betemits. And that 2 year age gap from when these kids are signed to when US players are drafted is a huge time frame to get a better grasp of a players abilities.
chop2chip (06-16-2016)
The Chosen One (06-16-2016)
The whole business about premium defensive positions is where I start to lose the prospect raters. I 100% agree that you need to have good defenders who can also hit at premium defensive positions. But I think a guy with the upside of Miguel Cabrera playing LF is a lot more valuable than a guy with Micky Moniak' upside.
Maybe I got it wrong. Or maybe the analyst doesn't see it that way.
I don't really think that Wood and Peraza were all that valuable in the market. In hindsight given what Oliveira has done you'd prefer it had been some other piece that came back instead of him, but the trade was always for Oliveira and other assets. The draft pick isn't just Wentz, it was the extra bonus pool money that let them configure the draft class the way they did.
Also, remember it was the Dodgers who overpaid for Oliveira. Atlanta just got a guy on a fairly reasonable salary for what they hoped he might be. I wouldn't call it a bad trade for Atlanta in retrospect. It's been fairly neutral. Certainly the Dodgers got almost nothing out of it so far except what value they got out of flipping Peraza.
Chalk it up to Braves moves some middling assets for a flyer on Oliveira, a couple of prospects, and draft flexibility. I think that is all it really was. I don't know that we can assume there were other big offers on the table.
I hate some Braves trades, though fewer than a lot of people do, but this one is just sort of meh. But then I never thought that much of Wood or Peraza.