Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Sean Newcomb's Control Issues

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,207
    Thanked in
    2,053 Posts

    Sean Newcomb's Control Issues

    I'll start by saying I'm no scout and have never been a pitcher. I'm just a guy who has watched a lot of baseball.

    That being said, I watched a few videos of Newcomb pitch this morning and was looking specifically at his control trying to see if it was something fixable. My conclusion was its definitely something that can be fixed.

    You'd see Newcomb go through several batters where his pitching motion was smooth and consistent. When this happened his stuff was crisper and he was hitting the glove.

    Then, for whatever reason, he'd lose it. His motion would be noticeably different and he'd lose his release point. When he lost his release point he'd miss by feet. Pitches would sail or bounce. Then he'd get things back in line and he'd be smoothly hitting 95 and placing the ball where he wanted it.

    I wondered if I was right in what I thought I saw so I looked into it. There was an article from last spring when Newcomb was sent to minor league camp. In it Scosia talked about how talented Newcomb is and how he just needs to find a way to keep his release point consistent and find it again when he does lose it.

    Honestly, watching him reminded me of a young Kimbrel. Kimbrel did the same thing when he first came up. One minute everything is smooth, he's locating his pitches, and is unhittable. The next it looks like his motion is disjointed, he can't find a release point, and has no idea where the ball is going.

    Whether Newcomb ever gets his mechanics down and is able to have consistent command is a question. But I'm pretty confident that his control is something that could very easily come along with more innings.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    Dalyn (03-05-2016), JohnAdcox (03-05-2016), mfree80 (03-05-2016)

  3. #2
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,254
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    954
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    691
    Thanked in
    488 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    I'll start by saying I'm no scout and have never been a pitcher. I'm just a guy who has watched a lot of baseball.

    That being said, I watched a few videos of Newcomb pitch this morning and was looking specifically at his control trying to see if it was something fixable. My conclusion was its definitely something that can be fixed.

    You'd see Newcomb go through several batters where his pitching motion was smooth and consistent. When this happened his stuff was crisper and he was hitting the glove.

    Then, for whatever reason, he'd lose it. His motion would be noticeably different and he'd lose his release point. When he lost his release point he'd miss by feet. Pitches would sail or bounce. Then he'd get things back in line and he'd be smoothly hitting 95 and placing the ball where he wanted it.

    I wondered if I was right in what I thought I saw so I looked into it. There was an article from last spring when Newcomb was sent to minor league camp. In it Scosia talked about how talented Newcomb is and how he just needs to find a way to keep his release point consistent and find it again when he does lose it.

    Honestly, watching him reminded me of a young Kimbrel. Kimbrel did the same thing when he first came up. One minute everything is smooth, he's locating his pitches, and is unhittable. The next it looks like his motion is disjointed, he can't find a release point, and has no idea where the ball is going.

    Whether Newcomb ever gets his mechanics down and is able to have consistent command is a question. But I'm pretty confident that his control is something that could very easily come along with more innings.
    Thanks. I agree with this.

    Careful though... Optimism is often not well received here.

  4. #3
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,631
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,390
    Thanked in
    7,539 Posts
    Optimism is fine. There have been some great pitchers (JR Richards, Randy Johnson) who struggled with control issues.

    But realism is also in order. If you look at the whole range of outcomes for pitchers who fit Newcomb's profile, there are a fair number of busts. And lots of in betweens. People like Jonathan Sanchez who had some success in the majors but didn't fully live up to their potential.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    Braves1976 (03-10-2016), Dalyn (03-05-2016), jpx7 (03-06-2016)

  6. #4
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,207
    Thanked in
    2,053 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Optimism is fine. There have been some great pitchers (JR Richards, Randy Johnson) who struggled with control issues.

    But realism is also in order. If you look at the whole range of outcomes for pitchers who fit Newcomb's profile, there are a fair number of busts. And lots of in betweens. People like Jonathan Sanchez who had some success in the majors but didn't fully live up to their potential.
    Absolutely. Newcomb could very possibly never be able to get things smoothed out.

    Some guys are just wild. They can have no mechanical issues but just lack the feel necessary to spot the ball. Some have mechanical issues they never can fix. Others fix their issues and become dominant.

    All I can say right now is Newcomb is not a guy that is just wild. His issues are fixable.

  7. #5
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    349
    Thanked in
    211 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Optimism is fine. There have been some great pitchers (JR Richards, Randy Johnson) who struggled with control issues.

    But realism is also in order. If you look at the whole range of outcomes for pitchers who fit Newcomb's profile, there are a fair number of busts. And lots of in betweens. People like Jonathan Sanchez who had some success in the majors but didn't fully live up to their potential.
    Agree with part of this and Newcomb definitely has development left. But he's also a guy with front line SP stuff and the frame to be an absolute workhorse. Command with power pitchers is always the last thing to come. Obviously some never figure it out but I'm confident in Newcomb. Also, I don't agree with the Sanchez comparison, he was never rated as highly as Newcombe currently is.

  8. #6
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,631
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,390
    Thanked in
    7,539 Posts
    BA has Newcomb at #24 on their Top 100 list.

    I'm going to list below all the pitchers ranked 20-30 on their lists over the 2001-2010 period.

    Chapman, Matzek, Kelly (the one just released by the Braves), Drabek, Turner, Porcello, Tillman, Matusz, Parker, Adenhart, Gio Gonzalez, Adam Miler, Pelfrey, Garza, Kershaw, Franklin Morales, Lester, Jenks, Niemann, Francis, Capellan, Hinckley, Edwin Jackson, Floyd, Tsao, Angel Guzman, Erwin Santana, Felix Hernandez, Bonderman, van Benschoten, Burnett, Rafael Soriano, Harden, Cliff Lee, Rauch, Howington, Carlos Hernandez, Peavy, Bonser, Bradley, George, Belisle, Bridges, Ainsworth

    Draw your conclusions.

  9. #7
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    BA has Newcomb at #24 on their Top 100 list.

    I'm going to list below all the pitchers ranked 20-30 on their lists over the 2001-2010 period.

    Chapman, Matzek, Kelly (the one just released by the Braves), Drabek, Turner, Porcello, Tillman, Matusz, Parker, Adenhart, Gio Gonzalez, Adam Miler, Pelfrey, Garza, Kershaw, Franklin Morales, Lester, Jenks, Niemann, Francis, Capellan, Hinckley, Edwin Jackson, Floyd, Tsao, Angel Guzman, Erwin Santana, Felix Hernandez, Bonderman, van Benschoten, Burnett, Rafael Soriano, Harden, Cliff Lee, Rauch, Howington, Carlos Hernandez, Peavy, Bonser, Bradley, George, Belisle, Bridges, Ainsworth

    Draw your conclusions.
    My conclusions are that he could be a bust or RP, a pretty good SP, or an unquestioned ace.

    Pretty much what we already know.

  10. #8
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    I'll start by saying I'm no scout and have never been a pitcher. I'm just a guy who has watched a lot of baseball.

    That being said, I watched a few videos of Newcomb pitch this morning and was looking specifically at his control trying to see if it was something fixable. My conclusion was its definitely something that can be fixed.

    You'd see Newcomb go through several batters where his pitching motion was smooth and consistent. When this happened his stuff was crisper and he was hitting the glove.

    Then, for whatever reason, he'd lose it. His motion would be noticeably different and he'd lose his release point. When he lost his release point he'd miss by feet. Pitches would sail or bounce. Then he'd get things back in line and he'd be smoothly hitting 95 and placing the ball where he wanted it.

    I wondered if I was right in what I thought I saw so I looked into it. There was an article from last spring when Newcomb was sent to minor league camp. In it Scosia talked about how talented Newcomb is and how he just needs to find a way to keep his release point consistent and find it again when he does lose it.

    Honestly, watching him reminded me of a young Kimbrel. Kimbrel did the same thing when he first came up. One minute everything is smooth, he's locating his pitches, and is unhittable. The next it looks like his motion is disjointed, he can't find a release point, and has no idea where the ball is going.

    Whether Newcomb ever gets his mechanics down and is able to have consistent command is a question. But I'm pretty confident that his control is something that could very easily come along with more innings.
    Thanks for your thoughts on this. I haven't seen him yet, but I've seen 5BB/9 and saw results on his first outing. But I always like the numbers to augment what I see rather than relying on them.

    I did see Randy Johnson a lot when he was young in Seattle. First time, he was all over the place. Two months later he was unhittable. That was repetition and mental focus, IMO.

    Hopefully Newcomb does the same.

  11. #9
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    196
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    338
    Thanked in
    261 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    Thanks for your thoughts on this. I haven't seen him yet, but I've seen 5BB/9 and saw results on his first outing. But I always like the numbers to augment what I see rather than relying on them.

    I did see Randy Johnson a lot when he was young in Seattle. First time, he was all over the place. Two months later he was unhittable. That was repetition and mental focus, IMO.

    Hopefully Newcomb does the same.
    By all accounts Randy actually changed how he finished his delivery based on a suggestion by Nolan Ryan in a session they had together in late 92, and that was what helped him be more consistent and less wild. Not that repetition and focus can't help Newcomb, but Randy isn't really a good comparison since he didn't really turn the corner until he was 29, and it was a delivery tweak that did it.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to auyushu For This Useful Post:

    Braves1976 (03-05-2016)

  13. #10
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,452
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,447
    Thanked in
    2,294 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    BA has Newcomb at #24 on their Top 100 list.

    I'm going to list below all the pitchers ranked 20-30 on their lists over the 2001-2010 period.

    Chapman, Matzek, Kelly (the one just released by the Braves), Drabek, Turner, Porcello, Tillman, Matusz, Parker, Adenhart, Gio Gonzalez, Adam Miler, Pelfrey, Garza, Kershaw, Franklin Morales, Lester, Jenks, Niemann, Francis, Capellan, Hinckley, Edwin Jackson, Floyd, Tsao, Angel Guzman, Erwin Santana, Felix Hernandez, Bonderman, van Benschoten, Burnett, Rafael Soriano, Harden, Cliff Lee, Rauch, Howington, Carlos Hernandez, Peavy, Bonser, Bradley, George, Belisle, Bridges, Ainsworth

    Draw your conclusions.
    That wasn't a different Kelley that the Braves released (we still have Casey, not Ryan).

  14. #11
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    I'm no scout either, but some of you know I give insight to many prospects I watch personally, most recently Lucas Sims and I think I was spot on. I was there with Braxton's dad for his first HR, but I digress.

    In Sean's case, he needs a full year in the minors honestly. He COULD pitch in the majors today with his stuff but it means nothing if you can't stop walking guys. What I see is 'lag'. He doesn't yet have a consistent release point although that's repetition. I'll be in Rome a lot, but follow him where I can. He is no doubt a stud. Some lefties don't get it until later. He will in my opinion.

  15. #12
    Fredi Gonzalez Supporter Dalyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your mom
    Posts
    14,077
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6,446
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,802
    Thanked in
    3,408 Posts
    I want to make a comb joke, but it really does not seem worth the effort. I didn't even bother to replace not with knot.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Dalyn For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (03-06-2016)

  17. #13
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,410
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,509
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,832
    Thanked in
    2,741 Posts
    Optimism isn't well received here? That's news to me.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  18. #14
    Fredi Gonzalez Supporter Dalyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your mom
    Posts
    14,077
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6,446
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,802
    Thanked in
    3,408 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Optimism isn't well received here? That's news to me.
    I'm so optimistic it burns when I breathe.

  19. #15
    Arizona Fall Leaguer
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    166
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    53
    Thanked in
    32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalyn View Post
    I'm so optimistic it burns when I breathe.
    Better than burning when you pee.......

Similar Threads

  1. Fried's Elite Control
    By Enscheff in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-26-2019, 03:13 PM
  2. 6/10 Game 1 vs Mets...Sean Newcomb Day
    By Enscheff in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 303
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 07:36 PM
  3. Gun Control
    By AerchAngel in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-03-2015, 01:17 PM
  4. Birth Control
    By 57Brave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-28-2013, 11:26 AM
  5. What the war on drugs & gun control have in common
    By acesfull86 in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-15-2013, 09:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •