acesfull86 (02-08-2018)
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
Just for my edification, Jaw, does having a verse from the gospels in one's sig qualify as "virtue signaling?"
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Well, the gospels are increasingly important to me, and I am making a genuine effort to modify my behavior to reflect my growing but still limited understanding of them. I typically change the signature when I find myself falling short of the new verses, as a reminder to myself to do better. It also serves as a filter on what I type, since I don't want to post something vile with what I consider to be a meaningful message appended at the end.
57's retweet factory is based on nothing of the kind, it's merely an attempt to score imaginary points in what he and his line leaders consider to be a fun game.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
this isn't hard. If you question a number, you Google it and it will either confirm or rebut the claim
quit asking people to do your research for you.
I think I am the only one here that still accommodates you
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food...omic-linkages/
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
That's impressive... it's weird that we have a national debt considering when the govt spends money it returns nearly twice as much in GDP
cajunrevenge (02-10-2018)
Because I don't think confiscating $1 from someone, paying for all of wasteful spending and bureaucratic processes, then handing it back to someone to spend, results in in a 73% increase from the original confiscation.
I could be wrong of course... but again, I'd be curious to see how that works... and if it does, why doesn't our massive deficits result in more than a meager 2% GDP growth?
The short answer seems to be "inter-industry and induced consumption effects."
You are wrong and a 5 second search would show you. Your quixotic philosophy doesn't translate well into numbers.
SNAP Stimulates Economic Activity During an Economic Downturn
When households spend their SNAP benefits, the direct effects are increased economic activity by the producers of the goods and services being purchased, as well as by the retail, wholesale and transportation system that delivers the goods and services. In an economic downturn when resources are underemployed, increased SNAP benefits start a multiplier process with an economic impact that is greater than the initial stimulus (direct effect). The multiplier effect results from inter-industry and induced consumption effects. Inter-industry effects arise from an increase in economic activity among those industries that provide input supplies to producers and a delivery system for purchased goods. Induced consumption effects arise from increased consumption expenditures by households that receive an increase in earnings from the additional work generated by new economic production activity.
Last edited by Runnin; 02-10-2018 at 02:08 AM.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
Weird you didn't answer my last question in the post you quoted
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
cajunrevenge (02-11-2018)
And if you do clap its proof everyone loves Donald. Check and mate.
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.