Originally Posted by
ramadon101
Oh I'm on the same page as you about giving up young talent for an aging player when you are in a rebuild phase. It doesn't make much sense. I think the FO's logic (if you can argue that) was that they would lock up a roughly league average 3B for ~3 years at minimal cost but they missed completely on Olivera's ability to hit MLB pitching NOW, much less the natural regression which typically affects player past their peak. The allegations against Olivera are just further egg on the FO's face, especially considering this organization prides itself on player "makeup".
I think they were hoping to find a Markakis v 2.0 in that you'd have a decent player at a decent (controlled) salary which would keep us competitive while the prospects continued their development. I don't think Olivera was intended to be the future savior at 3B by any means. With that said, I have to imagine Wood+Peraza had more value in the open market than the return we received, or, at the very least, that we could have flipped them for younger players per your comment.