Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46

Thread: Angels considering moving Trout?

  1. #1
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts

    Angels considering moving Trout?

    MLBTradeRumors had a blurb the other day saying that contacts were saying that the Angels should consider moving Trout. Please note, I haven't seen anything where the Angels have said that they are even remotely interested in moving Trout.

    But if so, how much (any team, not just Braves) would it take?

    I mean, we're talking about a once in a generation type player who is very likely on his way to the HoF barring unforeseen circumstances, who's still baseball young, who's signed for 4 more years to a reasonable contract by today's standards and who is the DiMaggio, Williams, Bonds or McGuire of his franchise.

    I just can't see how they do it under ANY circumstances, at least not until 2020 and it's clear he won't be back.

    But now......what would it take?

    Obviously, they would want a lot of cheap talent back. But minor league? Young ML? A mix? Would they want to send a salary dump along with him? Pujols would be most likely if not for his no-trade?


    Then they likely won't do an inter-division trade. So a Texas LAA trade would be highly unlikely. Which eliminates a Gallo, Brinson, Mazara, Profar type trade.

    And, any contender is unlikely to send multiple integral ML parts until after the season.

  2. #2
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,408
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,603
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,770
    Thanked in
    5,761 Posts
    Trout is a Jersey kid. Which means for him it's Yankees or bust
    Forever Fredi


  3. #3
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    Trout is a Jersey kid. Which means for him it's Yankees or bust
    So, does Severino, Betances, Mateo, Judge and Sanchez work? If I am the Yankees I do that in a minute. If I'm the Angels I can't pull that trigger.

  4. #4
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,408
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,603
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,770
    Thanked in
    5,761 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So, does Severino, Betances, Mateo, Judge and Sanchez work? If I am the Yankees I do that in a minute. If I'm the Angels I can't pull that trigger.
    If Trout flat out tells the Angels he won't sign before free agency and his preference is NYY then Anaheim may not have as much leverage.
    Forever Fredi


  5. #5
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Orlando,FL
    Posts
    8,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,017
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,356
    Thanked in
    1,494 Posts
    I'd imagine that IF there were talks to trade him, there is not one team in the league that has the talent required to get him. It would take a MASSIVE 3 or even 4 team trade to get the chips headed to LAA
    Get off my lawn!

  6. #6
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    If Trout flat out tells the Angels he won't sign before free agency and his preference is NYY then Anaheim may not have as much leverage.
    I understand that but he's signed through 2020 (the blurb I saw suggested trading him today). Now, apparently he does have a full no trade, so he has a say.

    I wonder if the Yanks or their mouthpieces are stirring things up?

  7. #7
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,107
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,350
    Thanked in
    3,370 Posts
    I wouldn't trade for Trout personally. The talent it would take to get him would cripple the team for a long, long time... I am not a believer that one superstar is required to win a championship... Hell, the Gnats have Harper and Stras (two once in a life time players) and have not won squat... I prefer to build the organization from the minors up..

  8. #8
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,396
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,508
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,830
    Thanked in
    2,739 Posts
    I highly doubt it. This is just speculation about what they should do. Unless Trout demands a trade I dont see it happening. Hypothetically speaking though I think they would want as much ML talent or close to ML talent as possible. Inciarte or Mallex would probably have to go to replace Trout in their outfield. I could see them asking for both Swanson and Albies. Swanson shouldnt happen but I might include Albies. So Inciarte/Albies is the core of the deal. Yeah I know neither comes close to replacing Trout but they are cheap and Trout is set to make 34 million after this year. Now for the pitching. I could part with Newcomb/Ellis/Folty/Jenkins. We dont really have any elite SP in the high minors so we have to go with quantity. Probably have to give them a decent throw in prospect. Lets say Max Povse. So all together thats Trout for Inciarte/Albies/Newcomb/Ellis/Folty/Jenkins/Povse. That wouldnt be my first offer but thats about what I would be willing to go to.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  9. #9
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    Only a few teams have what it takes.

    Boston could trade JBJ, Moncada, Devers, Swihart.

    We could do Swanson, Newcombe, Albies, Inciarte.

    Not saying that would wise of either team.

    Texas and the Dodgers might be only other teams able too.

  10. #10
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,495
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    I read an article where the author asked a front office guy what it would take to trade Trout, and the package had to consist of a top 5 prospect who was a position player, plus 3 other major parts. For the Braves that would mean the package centers around Swanson, Inciarte, Teheran and at least one other elite pitching prospect, but probably 2 more pitching prospects.

    Something like Swanson, Inciarte, Teheran, Sims and a lower level arm.

    The BoSox could get something going if they included both Moncada and Benintendi. The Dodgers would have to include Seager and Urias.

  11. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So, does Severino, Betances, Mateo, Judge and Sanchez work? If I am the Yankees I do that in a minute. If I'm the Angels I can't pull that trigger.
    That doesn't even come close, IMO.

  12. #12
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I read an article where the author asked a front office guy what it would take to trade Trout, and the package had to consist of a top 5 prospect who was a position player, plus 3 other major parts. For the Braves that would mean the package centers around Swanson, Inciarte, Teheran and at least one other elite pitching prospect, but probably 2 more pitching prospects.

    Something like Swanson, Inciarte, Teheran, Sims and a lower level arm.

    The BoSox could get something going if they included both Moncada and Benintendi. The Dodgers would have to include Seager and Urias.
    This package from the Braves also doesn't come close. The Dodgers are probably the only team that might be able to do it, and it would not only require Seager and Urias but probably de Leon as well.

  13. #13
    A Chip Off the Old Rock Julio3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    15,038
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6,273
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,790
    Thanked in
    5,155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So, does Severino, Betances, Mateo, Judge and Sanchez work? If I am the Yankees I do that in a minute. If I'm the Angels I can't pull that trigger.
    Hell ****ing no.

  14. #14
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,445
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,446
    Thanked in
    2,293 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So, does Severino, Betances, Mateo, Judge and Sanchez work? If I am the Yankees I do that in a minute. If I'm the Angels I can't pull that trigger.
    I don't think that even comes close IMO.

  15. #15
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,640
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    I just can't see it being worth it at all. I LOVE Trout and would love to have the guy, but we'd have a couple good years or him and no one around him.

  16. #16
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    I agree that the Yankees deal doesn't do it, but that's about the best I could come up with from them that made any sense.

    I really wasn't thinking about this from a Braves angle but what would you think about:

    Angels get: Freeman, Inciarte, Teheran, Viz

    Braves get: Trout and Pujols (assuming both waive their no trade)

    I know how I would feel about it, but curious

  17. #17
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    932
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    425
    Thanked in
    300 Posts
    Yeah, because there's so much of a chance of the Braves going after him.

  18. #18
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Knucksie View Post
    Yeah, because there's so much of a chance of the Braves going after him.
    If you read the original post it says ANY team, as in all other teams PLUS the Braves. It was a baseball question not necessarily a Braves question.

  19. #19
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,445
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,446
    Thanked in
    2,293 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    I agree that the Yankees deal doesn't do it, but that's about the best I could come up with from them that made any sense.

    I really wasn't thinking about this from a Braves angle but what would you think about:

    Angels get: Freeman, Inciarte, Teheran, Viz

    Braves get: Trout and Pujols (assuming both waive their no trade)

    I know how I would feel about it, but curious
    You would have to include Albies and Swanson and take on most of the Pujols contract, but that's definitely getting closer.

  20. #20
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    297
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    419
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    I agree that the Yankees deal doesn't do it, but that's about the best I could come up with from them that made any sense.

    I really wasn't thinking about this from a Braves angle but what would you think about:

    Angels get: Freeman, Inciarte, Teheran, Viz

    Braves get: Trout and Pujols (assuming both waive their no trade)

    I know how I would feel about it, but curious
    Our package going back would have to be A LOT BEEFIER.

    Freeman is a really good, but not elite 1B, Teheran is a #3 maybe #2, Viz is a closer and Inciate may not even be a full-time starter. Even picking up Pujols salary - that's not close.

    It would take a package that feels like a kick to the nuts as a fan;

    Something like;
    Inciarte, Blair, Folty, Albies, Swanson, Viz, Soroka and Acuna - and that's probably not enough.

Similar Threads

  1. Mike Trout
    By smootness in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 07-27-2019, 05:17 PM
  2. Trout extension
    By Tapate50 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-19-2019, 07:44 PM
  3. 'The Five' moving to 9PM
    By Krgrecw in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-20-2017, 04:29 PM
  4. Mike Trout
    By zitothebrave in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-20-2013, 10:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •