Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: 7/24 SUNNNY SUNDAY MINORS THREAD: What Night Saturday was!

  1. #21
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,480
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,099
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,713
    Thanked in
    3,899 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    You just refuse to admit that a guy who was a second rounder and is playing against mostly older competition and has a .800 OPS can be a good MLB player. Dude's having a breakout at 21 in AA and you give him no chance. That's really strange. I think you need to look at his stats this year and his progression a little closer.

    .296/.357/.446/.803, 8 Homers, 68 RBIS, 29 Doubles, 32 Walks, 66 Strikeouts, .150 ISO

    If you can't see upside in those numbers for a 21 year old in AA, I can't help you.
    My man DP sporting a .450 avg over his last 10.
    Ivermectin Man

  2. #22
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by auyushu View Post
    Producing almost 2 WAR a season for his first 6 seasons isn't a good MLB player? The hyperbole in this thread is getting kinda ridiculous.
    I'm just basing it off the language he used... "average"... I think Peterson has the potential easily be an above average player.

  3. #23
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,877
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,132
    Thanked in
    5,788 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    Yeah, it really seems like his mechanics get all out of whack and he loses his release point at times. When that happens he ends up walking everyone and giving up the big inning. When he's repeating his delivery well he's virtually unhittable.

    It reminds me of a young Craig Kimbrel. When Kimbrel came up he would either have his mechanics in sync and overpower you or they would be off, he wouldn't be able to find a consistent release point, and he would miss by feet.

    This is the most fixable cause of control issues. A lot of times it just takes reps. Newcomb was a cold weather pitcher and two sport athlete. It's not surprising he'd need refining with his mechanics. I just hope the lightbulb eventually comes on.
    I don't know if you've seen him pitch, or making assumptions... but the scouting reports I've read says his mechanics are basically perfect, and is not an obvious opportunity to improve.

  4. #24
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    I don't know if you've seen him pitch, or making assumptions... but the scouting reports I've read says his mechanics are basically perfect, and is not an obvious opportunity to improve.
    I think that's kind of his point... his mechanics are great usually... but it seems like one inning a game they just all the sudden go out of whack briefly.

  5. #25
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,877
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,132
    Thanked in
    5,788 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    I think that's kind of his point... his mechanics are great usually... but it seems like one inning a game they just all the sudden go out of whack briefly.
    Right... so is he saying that from watching his games? Or just guessing?

  6. #26
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    196
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    338
    Thanked in
    261 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    I'm just basing it off the language he used... "average"... I think Peterson has the potential easily be an above average player.
    He put the over/under at 11.5 WAR over 6 seasons, that means he thinks he will be a just under 2 WAR a year player on average. And that is an average to slightly above average player. The point he has been making, and that I have agreed with, is that a 2 WAR player in LF combined with Mallex and Inciarte isn't going to really improve our offense much. And we need a huge jolt offensively since we are the worst offense in baseball and it's not even close.

    Now hopefully he keeps improving and becomes a 3 WAR guy with low .800ish OPS in the majors, that would be really nice to see. But at this moment in time I don't think anyone could consider that the likely outcome, even if it's possible.

  7. #27
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    I'm just basing it off the language he used... "average"... I think Peterson has the potential easily be an above average player.
    2 WAR per season is the very definition of "average". It is literally in the official explanation of WAR. You think he will be better than that. I think he will be worse, so I offered to make a friendly wager.

    Nothing I have read or seen tells me he has "the potential easily be an above average player". That is a 3+ WAR player. Swanson has the ability to be a 3+ WAR player. Albies has the tools for 4+ WAR. Dustin Peterson has the tools of a below average player who probably ends up as a bench bat or starter on a bad team (a role 40 player).

    I fail to see how pegging a guy to be an average MLB player is bashing him. Further, I fail to see why it makes you so upset.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 07-25-2016 at 12:16 PM.

  8. #28
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Peterson .131 wRC+

    Big pitchers park too...
    Last edited by zbhargrove; 07-25-2016 at 12:37 PM.

  9. #29
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    2 WAR per season is the very definition of "average". It is literally in the official explanation of WAR. You think he will be better than that. I think he will be worse, so I offered to make a friendly wager.

    Nothing I have read or seen tells me he has "the potential easily be an above average player". That is a 3+ WAR player. Swanson has the ability to be a 3+ WAR player. Albies has the tools for 4+ WAR. Dustin Peterson has the tools of a below average player who probably ends up as a bench bat or starter on a bad team (a role 40 player).

    I fail to see how pegging a guy to be an average MLB player is bashing him. Further, I fail to see why it makes you so upset.
    This is not a knock on Swanson because I'm a big fan of his too... but these guys are playing at the same level and Peterson is younger.

    Peterson wRC+ .131
    Swanson wRC+ .118

    This would put Peterson somewhere in between the categories of above average and great

    As a second round pick, I think Peterson has better tools than you're giving him credit for. Its just taken him a while to start getting it.
    Last edited by zbhargrove; 07-25-2016 at 12:39 PM.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    Preacher (07-25-2016)

  11. #30
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    297
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    419
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    This is not a knock on Swanson because I'm a big fan of his too... but these guys are playing at the same level and Peterson is younger.

    Peterson wRC+ .131
    Swanson wRC+ .118

    This would put Peterson somewhere in between the categories of above average and great

    As a second round pick, I think Peterson has better tools than you're giving him credit for. Its just taken him a while to start getting it.
    Yup.

  12. #31
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    This is not a knock on Swanson because I'm a big fan of his too... but these guys are playing at the same level and Peterson is younger.

    Peterson wRC+ .131
    Swanson wRC+ .118

    This would put Peterson somewhere in between the categories of above average and great

    As a second round pick, I think Peterson has better tools than you're giving him credit for. Its just taken him a while to start getting it.
    One plays SS and one plays LF. I'm not sure why I would need to explain how "tools" encompasses more than the ability to hit. If you seriously think Swanson and Peterson have the same upside in terms of WAR, I don't really know what to say.

    And Swanson is looking more like a 2-3 WAR player (as opposed to the star we thought he was going to be), so comparing the offensive output of a LFer to a good-not-great SS is a little silly.

    It's fine, keep dreaming on Peterson to be the answer in LF to go along with Inciarte and Mallex. You are certainly allowed to think that OF combination is good enough to win anything. I personally do not, but to each their own.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 07-25-2016 at 01:09 PM.

  13. #32
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    One plays SS and one plays LF. I'm not sure why I would need to explain how "tools" encompasses more than the ability to hit. If you seriously think Swanson and Peterson have the same upside in terms of WAR, I don't really know what to say.

    And Swanson is looking more like a 2-3 WAR player (as opposed to the star we thought he was going to be), so comparing the offensive output of a LFer to a good-not-great SS is a little silly.

    It's fine, keep dreaming on Peterson to be the answer in LF to go along with Inciarte and Mallex. You are certainly allowed to think that OF combination is good enough to win anything. I personally do not, but to each their own.
    Enscheff....I get what you're saying, but I'm in the camp that believes he'll be much better than a 4th OF. His scouting report from when he was drafted and went to the AFL, are spot on with where is projecting and for a kid that young to do it at AA is AT LEAST pretty darn good. Here's his report:

    "Peterson is the type of hitter that will be able to extend the length of the lineup with good plate discipline and pitch recognition. He has the ability to make consistent contact, frequently hitting the ball solidly on the barrel of the bat. And he looks to take the pitch where it is thrown.
    Only 18, at this early point of his development, Peterson has a nice, easy swing without trying to extend his capabilities and hit home runs. His swing is polished and mature. There is little movement in his setup, his trigger or at the point of contact regarding his hitting mechanics.
    At 6-foot-2, 185 pounds, Peterson's right-handed swing is measured and compact. He swings as though he is happy to be using the entire field. He's patient enough to realize his power will come in time as he fills out with more strength and muscle.
    The key to Peterson at this stage is his ability to use his strong hands and quick wrists to get through the ball quickly and with good extension. As I saw when I scouted him in Arizona, he is hitting line drives without much loft or backspin on the ball. Those components generally develop at full maturity." - Bernie Pleskoff MLB.Com

    To each his own, but I'm in his camp. Seeing him three times this year...he's barrels balls slightly less than Albies who IMHO does it better than any position player we have.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Deester11 For This Useful Post:

    Garmel (07-25-2016), zbhargrove (07-25-2016)

  15. #33
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    One plays SS and one plays LF. I'm not sure why I would need to explain how "tools" encompasses more than the ability to hit. If you seriously think Swanson and Peterson have the same upside in terms of WAR, I don't really know what to say.

    And Swanson is looking more like a 2-3 WAR player (as opposed to the star we thought he was going to be), so comparing the offensive output of a LFer to a good-not-great SS is a little silly.

    It's fine, keep dreaming on Peterson to be the answer in LF to go along with Inciarte and Mallex. You are certainly allowed to think that OF combination is good enough to win anything. I personally do not, but to each their own.
    I never said anything about the OF being Peterson, Inciarte, and Mallex but thanks for putting those words into my mouth. If I had my way (and if Peterson worked out), I'd like to see Peterson in left, Inciarte or Mallex and center (the other one traded), and a big power bat in RF

  16. #34
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,111
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,350
    Thanked in
    3,370 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Deester11 View Post
    Enscheff....I get what you're saying, but I'm in the camp that believes he'll be much better than a 4th OF. His scouting report from when he was drafted and went to the AFL, are spot on with where is projecting and for a kid that young to do it at AA is AT LEAST pretty darn good. Here's his report:

    "Peterson is the type of hitter that will be able to extend the length of the lineup with good plate discipline and pitch recognition. He has the ability to make consistent contact, frequently hitting the ball solidly on the barrel of the bat. And he looks to take the pitch where it is thrown.
    Only 18, at this early point of his development, Peterson has a nice, easy swing without trying to extend his capabilities and hit home runs. His swing is polished and mature. There is little movement in his setup, his trigger or at the point of contact regarding his hitting mechanics.
    At 6-foot-2, 185 pounds, Peterson's right-handed swing is measured and compact. He swings as though he is happy to be using the entire field. He's patient enough to realize his power will come in time as he fills out with more strength and muscle.
    The key to Peterson at this stage is his ability to use his strong hands and quick wrists to get through the ball quickly and with good extension. As I saw when I scouted him in Arizona, he is hitting line drives without much loft or backspin on the ball. Those components generally develop at full maturity." - Bernie Pleskoff MLB.Com

    To each his own, but I'm in his camp. Seeing him three times this year...he's barrels balls slightly less than Albies who IMHO does it better than any position player we have.
    I also saw D. Pete twice this year and he struck me as the best hitter on the field.. either team. He doesn't swing hard but the ball just jumps off his bat. I think with a bit more effort he would have more homeruns. But what I saw was a guy who could just make a pitcher work. He is going to be better than just average when he puts it all together. Some of his At bats were just amazing. Never swung at a 'pithcers' pitch, but even his outs, he had at least one line drive foul. It is easy to box score scout a guy (we all do with most of our prospects).. but if you see him hit, you would see what people are saying that he is going to be good one day.

  17. #35
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Deester11 View Post
    "Peterson is the type of hitter that will be able to extend the length of the lineup with good plate discipline and pitch recognition.
    A LFer who is "able to extend the length of the lineup" is pretty much the alternate definition of "average player". That's a LFer who bats 6th or 7th. That's a 2 WAR guy. That's an average player.

    Again, nothing in that report suggests a 3+ WAR player.

  18. #36
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    His performance this year rockets him up our prospects list if he keeps it up, IMO

  19. #37
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    I also saw D. Pete twice this year and he struck me as the best hitter on the field.. either team. He doesn't swing hard but the ball just jumps off his bat. I think with a bit more effort he would have more homeruns. But what I saw was a guy who could just make a pitcher work. He is going to be better than just average when he puts it all together. Some of his At bats were just amazing. Never swung at a 'pithcers' pitch, but even his outs, he had at least one line drive foul. It is easy to box score scout a guy (we all do with most of our prospects).. but if you see him hit, you would see what people are saying that he is going to be good one day.
    I hope you're right. I hope he turns into a 3+ WAR guy that allows the Braves to have a 12+ WAR OF of Peterson, Mallex and some stud in RF.

    I'll put you down in the "over 11.5 WAR" camp.

  20. #38
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,111
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,350
    Thanked in
    3,370 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I hope you're right. I hope he turns into a 3+ WAR guy that allows the Braves to have a 12+ WAR OF of Peterson, Mallex and some stud in RF.

    I'll put you down in the "over 11.5 WAR" camp.
    I am fine with that.

  21. #39
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,664
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,206
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    I don't know if you've seen him pitch, or making assumptions... but the scouting reports I've read says his mechanics are basically perfect, and is not an obvious opportunity to improve.
    I've watched a good bit of video and read up on him a good bit. When Newcomb is on, his mechanics are perfect and his control is spot on. So it's not something that's wrong with his actual pitching mechanics. When he gets into trouble is when things get out of sync causing him to lose his release point and get very wild. It's when his mechanics are messed up that he has issues.

    There's a quote from the Angels manager when he got sent down from ST last year where the manager was very complimentary and said he just has to be able to find a consistent release point.

  22. #40
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I hope you're right. I hope he turns into a 3+ WAR guy that allows the Braves to have a 12+ WAR OF of Peterson, Mallex and some stud in RF.

    I'll put you down in the "over 11.5 WAR" camp.
    Count me in. I don't know if I'm driving the bus, but I've got a front row seat.

Similar Threads

  1. MINORS THREAD SUNDAY 5/7 .... Sunny Sunday in the Park(s)
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-08-2017, 09:24 AM
  2. 7/24 SUNNNY SUNDAY MINORS THREAD: What Night Saturday was!
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 07-25-2016, 02:13 PM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-26-2016, 07:24 PM
  4. 6/25 Minors FINAL Saturday ... Beech, Allard, Folty aces of night
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-26-2016, 07:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •