Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: WAR

  1. #41
    It's OVER 5,000! yeezus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,108
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,501
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,720
    Thanked in
    1,122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    Adrian Peterson, it's from an old football debate
    Oh damn you said Chris Johnson and I thought you meant our one and only BABIP.

  2. #42
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,712
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Yeah I should have clarified. But Carpe knew what I was talking bout
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  3. #43
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,482
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,762
    Thanked in
    1,989 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    Research.

    Of course I don't expect you to back that up.

    Chris Johnson>AP

    LMAO

    Lists evidence that says WAR is inconsistent, then says he wants research proving otherwise.... LULZ


    As far as AP and CJ, I said that when CJ was the best RB in the league, and the results showed it. I used to say Pujols was the best hitter in the league when he was producing too. Shocker.

  4. #44
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,712
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Lists evidence that says WAR is inconsistent, then says he wants research proving otherwise.... LULZ


    As far as AP and CJ, I said that when CJ was the best RB in the league, and the results showed it. I used to say Pujols was the best hitter in the league when he was producing too. Shocker.
    Results didn't show that then if you actually knew what you were talking about. Johnson had 1 amazing year then a bunch of good or bad ones depending on how many times he broke a big run or not. Face it I was massivvely right you were massively wrong. It's ok, it happens a lot when we debate.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  5. #45
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,482
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,762
    Thanked in
    1,989 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    Results didn't show that then if you actually knew what you were talking about. Johnson had 1 amazing year then a bunch of good or bad ones depending on how many times he broke a big run or not. Face it I was massivvely right you were massively wrong. It's ok, it happens a lot when we debate.

    At the time I said that, he had the most yards in the league since he came into the league and had yet to have a down yr.

  6. #46
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,712
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    At the time I said that, he had the most yards in the league since he came into the league and had yet to have a down yr.
    At the time you said that the sample was skewed by a 2000 yard season. I clearly pointed out that if you eliminated Johnson's homerun carries, he lost an insane amount of yards. He benefitted from a good run blocking OL, something AP didn't have. I forget which stat I cited but I believe it was number of times the back was hit in the backfield and Johnson was near the bottom but AP was near the top.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  7. #47
    Arizona Fall Leaguer
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    195
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    91
    Thanked in
    57 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chipchildress View Post
    RK PLAYER TEAM GP GS IP H R ER BB SO W L SV BLSV WAR WHIP ERA
    19 Rex Brothers COL 59 0 55.2 37 9 9 27 60 2 0 13 1 3.0 1.15 1.46
    22 Craig Kimbrel ATL 53 0 52.2 31 6 6 17 78 2 2 41 3 2.9 0.91 1.03
    "War! huh! (Good God, Y'all) What is it good for?"---Edwin Starr.
    Last edited by JCarbo76; 08-27-2013 at 08:25 AM.

  8. #48
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,828
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,124
    Thanked in
    5,781 Posts
    My beef with WAR is I don't understand why different sites have different numbers?

    Why does fangraphs differ from BR. And ESPN?

    Which should I use?

  9. #49
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,712
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    My beef with WAR is I don't understand why different sites have different numbers?

    Why does fangraphs differ from BR. And ESPN?

    Which should I use?
    The which you should use is your choice. This year BR and fangraphs closed their gap by using the same replacement level gap. For which one to use it depends on what you value more, for offensive value essentially fg uses wRAA + UBR in br they use wRAA with a few twists (most which don't make a difference in today's life) their own version of baserunning, and ground into double play stat. For defense fg uses UZR br uses DRS. So basically they have similar offensive values but the difference is if you like UZR or DRS. For example, Simmons has a 3.8 fWAR but a 5.4 rWAR. Because of the difference in his DRS vs UZR. So to determine which of those 2 you like better you have to decide which fielding metric you like better. For pitching they vary greatly. Basically you would decided which stat you like better ERA or FIP. Personally since we roll defensive stats into the positive or negative I prefer FIP, Bref's version is improving but to me there are too many sliding factors involved. They try to take ERA then try to apply a defensive slider for it, which to me is one too many moving parts. They'll get there when they have a more clean way of adjusting for balls in play. Personally I'm hoping FG makes the switch to doing SIERA for their WAR as I think it's a more accurate measurement than FIP though it does need some fine tuning.

    And I could be wrong, but I believe ESPN uses bref's WAR
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  10. #50
    Lynchburg Prospect chopdrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    468
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    108
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    133
    Thanked in
    83 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Julio3000 View Post
    Same old ****. Brothers gotta work twice as hard to get any respect.
    Nearly every one of you people skimmed right past this post. This is tremendous. I'd like it 18 times if I could.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to chopdrew For This Useful Post:

    Julio3000 (08-28-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •