Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts

    If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...

    There is a new post up at MLBTraderumors that says the Mets now do intend to trade Byrd to a team putting in a waiver claim for him given the recent news on Harvey's UCL (probably to secure the best spot they can for next year's draft). On a balance of a 1 year contract, Byrd seems like the perfect replacement for Heyward given his plus defense in RF and decent bat. He won't replace all of Jason's offense or defense, but he'd probably be our best bet going into the playoffs. Of course I doubt Byrd ever drops down to us on the waiver wire, but I'd nab him in a second if he did.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ramadon101 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-27-2013)

  3. #2
    Arbitration Eligible NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,273
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,151
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    723
    Thanked in
    528 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ramadon101 View Post
    There is a new post up at MLBTraderumors that says the Mets now do intend to trade Byrd to a team putting in a waiver claim for him given the recent news on Harvey's UCL (probably to secure the best spot they can for next year's draft). On a balance of a 1 year contract, Byrd seems like the perfect replacement for Heyward given his plus defense in RF and decent bat. He won't replace all of Jason's offense or defense, but he'd probably be our best bet going into the playoffs. Of course I doubt Byrd ever drops down to us on the waiver wire, but I'd nab him in a second if he did.
    He was claimed this morning, no word on who though:



    Adam Rubin of ESPN New York hears that Marlon Byrd was claimed off revocable waivers.

    The Mets now have 48 hours to work out a trade with the claiming team. It was previously believed that the Mets preferred to keep Byrd for the rest of the season, but Rubin reported early Tuesday morning that the team is preparing for the possibility of multiple trades within the next couple of days.

  4. #3
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,317
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,356
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,004
    Thanked in
    2,025 Posts
    We're not getting him, but it would be a lift for sure. And if Heyward did come back for October, he could play center.

    Heyward
    Justin
    Freddie
    Byrd
    Mac
    CJ
    Uggla
    Simmons

  5. #4
    Spring Training Invitee
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    125
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    87
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    Should have signed him in the offseason. Have always liked Byrd. Think he's better than Reed Johnson or even the (somewhat) resurgent Jordan Schaffer.

  6. #5
    Spring Training Invitee
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    125
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    87
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    To finish the OP's question, IMO:

    If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...
    ...then they (like all teams) should be allowed to trade for any player they wish to pursue, without waiver wire interference.

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,317
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,356
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,004
    Thanked in
    2,025 Posts
    The way I see it, if Byrd did fall down to us, the Mets owe it to us since they pretty much may have ruined our season, albeit not on purpose.

  8. #7
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,622
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,258
    Thanked in
    1,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravebonebook View Post
    Should have signed him in the offseason. Have always liked Byrd. Think he's better than Reed Johnson or even the (somewhat) resurgent Jordan Schaffer.
    He wouldn't be starting so he wouldn't get near the at bats he is now.

    Not sure the big deal.

  9. #8
    Atlanta Braves Fan
    Wash Nationals Fan
    Bryce Harper Fanatic

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    87
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,317
    Thanked in
    874 Posts
    No way the Royals trade Santana for only Salcedo.

  10. #9
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,288
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    He wouldn't be starting so he wouldn't get near the at bats he is now.

    Not sure the big deal.
    ^This... why would we have signed Byrd? Better question... why would Byrd have signed with us to be a bench player when he could be playing everyday? Not a very logical post.

  11. #10
    Spring Training Invitee
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    125
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    87
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    He wouldn't be starting so he wouldn't get near the at bats he is now.

    Not sure the big deal.
    We've used outfielders #7-9 this year. 5 of the 6 'starting' outfielders have been on the DL and Justin has been banged up plenty. Byrd would have played a lot for this team. Not a starter, true, but he would have gotten plenty of bats. Don't know if he would have even signed but he would have been a decent pick-up.

  12. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,288
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravebonebook View Post
    We've used outfielders #7-9 this year. 5 of the 6 'starting' outfielders have been on the DL and Justin has been banged up plenty. Byrd would have played a lot for this team. Not a starter, true, but he would have gotten plenty of bats. Don't know if he would have even signed but he would have been a decent pick-up.
    Yes but there is no way Byrd could have predicted injury futures for the Braves before the season started. An OF many were calling the best in MLB preseason. If there was a chance to start (and I'm sure he had plenty of interest as a potential starter) do you really think Byrd would have been a 4th OFer which is what he would have been when signed? Makes no sense.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2016, 12:17 AM
  2. 6/11 Saturday's Minors Final ...M-Braves split back-to-back marathons
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2016, 12:17 AM
  3. GDT 5/21 BRAVES vs PHILLIES Seeking back-to-back wins?
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 05-22-2016, 09:29 AM
  4. GDT 8/13 Braves vs. Dodgers: Simba Back, Heyward Leading Off!
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 322
    Last Post: 08-13-2014, 11:31 PM
  5. Replies: 293
    Last Post: 09-21-2013, 08:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •