Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...

  1. #1
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts

    If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...

    There is a new post up at MLBTraderumors that says the Mets now do intend to trade Byrd to a team putting in a waiver claim for him given the recent news on Harvey's UCL (probably to secure the best spot they can for next year's draft). On a balance of a 1 year contract, Byrd seems like the perfect replacement for Heyward given his plus defense in RF and decent bat. He won't replace all of Jason's offense or defense, but he'd probably be our best bet going into the playoffs. Of course I doubt Byrd ever drops down to us on the waiver wire, but I'd nab him in a second if he did.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ramadon101 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-27-2013)

  3. #2
    Arbitration Eligible NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,151
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    720
    Thanked in
    526 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ramadon101 View Post
    There is a new post up at MLBTraderumors that says the Mets now do intend to trade Byrd to a team putting in a waiver claim for him given the recent news on Harvey's UCL (probably to secure the best spot they can for next year's draft). On a balance of a 1 year contract, Byrd seems like the perfect replacement for Heyward given his plus defense in RF and decent bat. He won't replace all of Jason's offense or defense, but he'd probably be our best bet going into the playoffs. Of course I doubt Byrd ever drops down to us on the waiver wire, but I'd nab him in a second if he did.
    He was claimed this morning, no word on who though:



    Adam Rubin of ESPN New York hears that Marlon Byrd was claimed off revocable waivers.

    The Mets now have 48 hours to work out a trade with the claiming team. It was previously believed that the Mets preferred to keep Byrd for the rest of the season, but Rubin reported early Tuesday morning that the team is preparing for the possibility of multiple trades within the next couple of days.

  4. #3
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,334
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,989
    Thanked in
    2,013 Posts
    We're not getting him, but it would be a lift for sure. And if Heyward did come back for October, he could play center.

    Heyward
    Justin
    Freddie
    Byrd
    Mac
    CJ
    Uggla
    Simmons

  5. #4
    Spring Training Invitee
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    125
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    87
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    Should have signed him in the offseason. Have always liked Byrd. Think he's better than Reed Johnson or even the (somewhat) resurgent Jordan Schaffer.

  6. #5
    Spring Training Invitee
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    125
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    87
    Thanked in
    43 Posts
    To finish the OP's question, IMO:

    If the Braves don't think Heyward will be back for the Playoffs...
    ...then they (like all teams) should be allowed to trade for any player they wish to pursue, without waiver wire interference.

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,334
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,989
    Thanked in
    2,013 Posts
    The way I see it, if Byrd did fall down to us, the Mets owe it to us since they pretty much may have ruined our season, albeit not on purpose.

  8. #7
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts
    True.

    Josh Willingham just got placed on waivers.

    His Ks are up, but he's got a good walk rate and can explode at any moment if he gets into a groove. If we don't get Byrd (unlikely), I'd be ecstatic with Willingham (although he's still under contract for 7m or so next year.. he's tradeable at that price, though).

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ramadon101 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-27-2013)

  10. #8
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,334
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,989
    Thanked in
    2,013 Posts
    Byrd or Willingham would be preferable to what we're getting right now, even if Willingham hasn't had a great year. But I see the Pirates/Dodgers or even the Nats/Phillies just throwing up road blocks at us for anyone. I think largely our success offensively from here on relies on three things.

    1. Justin needs to carry the team and be the MVP, and Freddie, Mac and CJ need to continue to produce.
    2. Uggla has to go on one of his two-month tears. Give us something more than just some walks and a home run every 8-10 games.
    3. Either BJ has to start hitting, or one or two out of Schafer, Gattis and Terd have to become a force.

  11. #9
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesnumberone View Post
    Byrd or Willingham would be preferable to what we're getting right now
    Byrd yes. But Willingham has had a very poor season.

    Our best outfield right now is Terdoslavich in left, Schafer/Upton platoon in center, Justin in right. Don't see where Willingham would be an upgrade relative to that.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 08-27-2013 at 12:08 PM.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    Garmel (08-27-2013)

  13. #10
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,213
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,455
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,824
    Thanked in
    1,321 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Byrd yes. But Willingham has had a very poor season.

    Our best outfield right now is Terdoslavich in left, Schafer/Upton platoon in center, Justin in right. Don't see where Willingham would be an upgrade relative to that.
    Yep. It's also important to not have Schafer and BJ Upton in the same lineup if it can be helped.

  14. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,334
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,989
    Thanked in
    2,013 Posts
    Scratch Byrd off the list. On his way to Pitt.

  15. #12
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,753
    Thanked in
    1,279 Posts
    Dammit, ramadon. If you hadn't said anything the Pirates would never have gotten the idea of picking up Byrd. Why must you ruin our season?

  16. #13
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts
    Sorry MF. I'm the cause the Braves missed out on David Ortiz (for Robert Freaking Fick) too. I need to stop posting my ideas on public forums and hurry up and become a GM already.

    So which team steals Willingham now?

  17. #14
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    313
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    33
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    56
    Thanked in
    36 Posts
    Ortiz would have the play defense and that would've been rough.

  18. #15
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts
    Fick 2003 - .4 WAR

    Ortiz 2003 - 3.1 WAR (then would go on to post a 4, 5 and 5.5 WAR in successive seasons... in the same period Fick posted a 0, -1.5 and another -1.5 WAR)

    I hear what you're saying on D, but I'd say we lost that bet pretty badly. We could have used Ortiz when he was younger and still serviceable at 1B and then flipped him as a valuable DH for a lot.
    Last edited by ramadon101; 08-27-2013 at 03:34 PM.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to ramadon101 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-27-2013)

  20. #16
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,753
    Thanked in
    1,279 Posts
    Per Rosenthal, the Royals have put Ervin Santana on waivers. Probably not meaningful (everyone puts everyone on waivers, and the Royals definitely want to keep him), he wouldn't fix any offensive issues, obviously, and the Royals would ask a lot for him, but if we claimed Kyle Lohse, Santana isn't the worst idea in the world.

  21. #17
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts
    ... and Dayton just swung a trade for Clayton Mortenson from the Red Sox (who has recently been stretched out and converted into a SP). Oh to dream a dream.

  22. #18
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Santana is a better idea than Lohse. He's pitched better than Lohse this year. And no financial obligation beyond 2013.

    Having said that, I think the Royals will hold on to him. They can get a #1 draft pick for him. We would have to offer something more attractive. As a point of reference they would value a player like Hursh about the same as a potential #1 pick.

  23. #19
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,753
    Thanked in
    1,279 Posts
    Can we sign Francoeur just to trade him back to Dayton?

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MadduxFanII For This Useful Post:

    BedellBrave (08-27-2013), JohnAdcox (08-27-2013), jpx7 (08-27-2013), Mrs. Meta (08-28-2013)

  25. #20
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    329
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    438
    Thanked in
    161 Posts
    Would you trade Salcedo for Santana? I would. And he's the type of player that Dayton would covet.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2016, 12:17 AM
  2. 6/11 Saturday's Minors Final ...M-Braves split back-to-back marathons
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2016, 12:17 AM
  3. GDT 5/21 BRAVES vs PHILLIES Seeking back-to-back wins?
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 05-22-2016, 09:29 AM
  4. GDT 8/13 Braves vs. Dodgers: Simba Back, Heyward Leading Off!
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 322
    Last Post: 08-13-2014, 11:31 PM
  5. Replies: 293
    Last Post: 09-21-2013, 08:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •