Page 17 of 68 FirstFirst ... 715161718192767 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 1345

Thread: 2016-2017 Off-Season Thread

  1. #321
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TXBravesFan View Post
    Astros also signed Josh Reddick to a 4yr deal, somewhere north of $50 million.
    Looking at reddicks deal and stats makes markakis look like a bargain. Still want to trade him and play Dustin Peterson

  2. #322
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,741
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,432
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,440
    Thanked in
    2,469 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    Looking at reddicks deal and stats makes markakis look like a bargain. Still want to trade him and play Dustin Peterson
    Reddick is a much better palyer than Markakis. His last 3 years he's had a 113 OPS+ the 3 years before we signed Markakis he had a 104. Reddick is also younger and a net positive instead of net negative defender. Add in the 2 years of market inflation and it works out to basically signing a younger, better player for the same money.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  3. #323
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,699
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    957
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    Per MLB trade rumors

    Though the Braves have been connected to several top young starters, their focus is on trying to work a deal with the White Sox for Chris Sale, according to David O’Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. It’s still unclear just how hard Atlanta will push to pry him loose, and certainly Chicago isn’t in a position where it needs to move its affordable, excellent, and still-youthful ace. And as O’Brien notes, the Braves have signaled previously that they aren’t interested in emptying their farm to move toward contention — though there may be an added willingness to give up some premium assets in this case, as would certainly be necessary to get something done.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Hudson2 For This Useful Post:

    GovClintonTyree (11-18-2016)

  5. #324
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,699
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    957
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    I know people say no way the Braves trade for an ace but there is way to much smoke here not to be fire. Coppy wants Sale bad and it sounds like something could happen if one of the Braves or Sox flinch.

  6. #325
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    I believe the smoke is real, just don't believe Sale is the actual fire. I think we get a good young pitcher, just don't thinks it's Sale.

  7. #326
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,494
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    I know people say no way the Braves trade for an ace but there is way to much smoke here not to be fire. Coppy wants Sale bad and it sounds like something could happen if one of the Braves or Sox flinch.
    The Braves are not going to be a good team without Folty, Swanson, and Albies, so if any of those players are used to acquire Sale it will be a lateral move overall.

    The only expendable MLB piece is Ender due to the presence of Mallex, so if Coppy can get the ChiSox to take a deal centered around Inciarte and Newcomb there might some fire.

    If Coppy can also take on Shields as a way to lower the cost for Sale, they might be on to something.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (11-18-2016)

  9. #327
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    Reddick is a much better palyer than Markakis. His last 3 years he's had a 113 OPS+ the 3 years before we signed Markakis he had a 104. Reddick is also younger and a net positive instead of net negative defender. Add in the 2 years of market inflation and it works out to basically signing a younger, better player for the same money.
    Yep - and there's no chance whatsoever that the Dodgers would love to have the prospects they gave up to get Reddick and Hill back, right???

    Like it or not, there are always going to be times when small sample sizes do matter.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  10. #328
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,107
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,350
    Thanked in
    3,370 Posts
    There was a tweet that said something to the effect of "A few Baseball execs said they think the Braves and Stros are going to be the most active this off season." So far that has been true, with the Stros going bigger. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Braves make a move or two before it is all said and done...

  11. #329
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,538
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    5,522 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    Yep - and there's no chance whatsoever that the Dodgers would love to have the prospects they gave up to get Reddick and Hill back, right???

    Like it or not, there are always going to be times when small sample sizes do matter.
    Oh my god. You have the worst arguments. Seriously.

  12. #330
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    Reddick is a much better palyer than Markakis. His last 3 years he's had a 113 OPS+ the 3 years before we signed Markakis he had a 104. Reddick is also younger and a net positive instead of net negative defender. Add in the 2 years of market inflation and it works out to basically signing a younger, better player for the same money.
    That's not true. Markakis was a Gold Glove finalist.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    Prikichi (11-18-2016), The Chosen One (11-18-2016), UNCBlue012 (11-18-2016)

  14. #331
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,639
    Thanked in
    1,992 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    Per MLB trade rumors

    Though the Braves have been connected to several top young starters, their focus is on trying to work a deal with the White Sox for Chris Sale, according to David O’Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. It’s still unclear just how hard Atlanta will push to pry him loose, and certainly Chicago isn’t in a position where it needs to move its affordable, excellent, and still-youthful ace. And as O’Brien notes, the Braves have signaled previously that they aren’t interested in emptying their farm to move toward contention — though there may be an added willingness to give up some premium assets in this case, as would certainly be necessary to get something done.
    I think his plan right now is simple: Sign a solid defensive-minded catcher and save any and all prospects for a big arm. I could be wrong, and part of me wants to be unless it's Archer (more control), but I think there is a legit chance we get a TOR ace.

    Personally, I'm looking at catcher and third basemen. An ace comes last unless we get a phenomenal deal.

  15. #332
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The Braves are not going to be a good team without Folty, Swanson, and Albies, so if any of those players are used to acquire Sale it will be a lateral move overall.

    The only expendable MLB piece is Ender due to the presence of Mallex, so if Coppy can get the ChiSox to take a deal centered around Inciarte and Newcomb there might some fire.

    If Coppy can also take on Shields as a way to lower the cost for Sale, they might be on to something.
    I don't see Albies being involved as a lateral move at all... he hasn't even seen an MLB at-bat. Jace isn't the ideal second baseman, but as a 7 or 8 place hitter, he's fine. Not saying I would want to trade Albies (although, of our offense prospect assets, he's probably the most expendable with quite a few second basemen in the pipeline), but if you end up turning Wisler's rotation spot into Sale... and get rid of Mallex/Albies + other lower level prospects... there's no way that's a lateral move... that is a clear upgrade.

  16. #333
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    577
    Thanked in
    376 Posts
    There does seem to be some smoke to this Sale deal. I'v been waiting for Coppy to come out and silence it a little like he did with the Archer rumor, but he's been quiet. We need a front of the rotation starter, lefty, as well as a marketable name. He checks all the boxes. There could be something here. I would still rather pass to be honest, but it is interesting.

    I don't wanna lose Albies, but I think he'd be inlcuded. 2B is not a hard position to fill on a major league team and we've developed a pipeline recently. Any of Jace, Camargo, TD, and Moore could see playing time there this season.

    I don't know if they would want Ender or Mallex back, but one of them would be included. I think this would come down to the arms they chose with the Braves preferring to hold on to Ender.

    After that they'd probably be looking at one major league ready arm and one high upside arm. It's hard to speculate as every team values arms in different ways. I think we'd trade from the starters we acquired via trade over the ones we've drafted, as the ones we acquired in trade were what we could get and the ones drafted are the ones we pin pointed. (except for maybe Touki)

    Folty/Wisler/Blair/Newcomb/Fried/Touki....Out of that group the two whose value are at a high are Folty and Fried. The Sox do like lefties though, so maybe Newcomb and Wisler going back could suffice. That would probably mean you have to lose Ender.

    So my complete baseless fan speculation would be Folty/Fried/Albies/Mallex or Wisler/Newcomb/Albies/Ender. There'd probably be a relief arm out of options like like Jose Ramirez, Chris Withrow, or Ian Kroll in there as well just because they could.

  17. #334
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,639
    Thanked in
    1,992 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chico View Post
    There does seem to be some smoke to this Sale deal. I'v been waiting for Coppy to come out and silence it a little like he did with the Archer rumor, but he's been quiet. We need a front of the rotation starter, lefty, as well as a marketable name. He checks all the boxes. There could be something here. I would still rather pass to be honest, but it is interesting.

    I don't wanna lose Albies, but I think he'd be inlcuded. 2B is not a hard position to fill on a major league team and we've developed a pipeline recently. Any of Jace, Camargo, TD, and Moore could see playing time there this season.

    I don't know if they would want Ender or Mallex back, but one of them would be included. I think this would come down to the arms they chose with the Braves preferring to hold on to Ender.

    After that they'd probably be looking at one major league ready arm and one high upside arm. It's hard to speculate as every team values arms in different ways. I think we'd trade from the starters we acquired via trade over the ones we've drafted, as the ones we acquired in trade were what we could get and the ones drafted are the ones we pin pointed. (except for maybe Touki)

    Folty/Wisler/Blair/Newcomb/Fried/Touki....Out of that group the two whose value are at a high are Folty and Fried. The Sox do like lefties though, so maybe Newcomb and Wisler going back could suffice. That would probably mean you have to lose Ender.

    So my complete baseless fan speculation would be Folty/Fried/Albies/Mallex or Wisler/Newcomb/Albies/Ender. There'd probably be a relief arm out of options like like Jose Ramirez, Chris Withrow, or Ian Kroll in there as well just because they could.
    I don't think we give up Folty, personally. Albies/Smith/Newcomb/Wisler is what we'd probably be comfortable (albiet not happy) and I don't think that's enough.

  18. #335
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    I don't think we give up Folty, personally. Albies/Smith/Newcomb/Wisler is what we'd probably be comfortable (albiet not happy) and I don't think that's enough.
    Huddy was speculating that such a deal might be expanded to include Todd Frazier. He's only got one more arb year. I think that makes a lot of sense.

    I do think your proposed deal is enough and if it comes together it will look something like that. That is stiff enough that it hurts, which is probably a signal that it's about right. Fills a bunch of needs and wants for the Sox, too.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    Hudson2 (11-18-2016), UNCBlue012 (11-18-2016)

  20. #336
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    I'm still not convinced that Mallex is the one to trade. Inciarte's value will likely never be higher and Mallex has the potential to be better than him. While Mallex wasn't exactly a huge prospect... he has been much more highly regarded than Ender ever was in the minors. Mallex seems to have a bit more pop... has much more speed... and has walked a a pretty good clip so far in the majors. He may not has as much defensive value, but he still has the potential to be a very good defensive CFer.

  21. #337
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chico View Post
    There does seem to be some smoke to this Sale deal. I'v been waiting for Coppy to come out and silence it a little like he did with the Archer rumor, but he's been quiet. We need a front of the rotation starter, lefty, as well as a marketable name. He checks all the boxes. There could be something here. I would still rather pass to be honest, but it is interesting.

    I don't wanna lose Albies, but I think he'd be inlcuded. 2B is not a hard position to fill on a major league team and we've developed a pipeline recently. Any of Jace, Camargo, TD, and Moore could see playing time there this season.

    I don't know if they would want Ender or Mallex back, but one of them would be included. I think this would come down to the arms they chose with the Braves preferring to hold on to Ender.

    After that they'd probably be looking at one major league ready arm and one high upside arm. It's hard to speculate as every team values arms in different ways. I think we'd trade from the starters we acquired via trade over the ones we've drafted, as the ones we acquired in trade were what we could get and the ones drafted are the ones we pin pointed. (except for maybe Touki)

    Folty/Wisler/Blair/Newcomb/Fried/Touki....Out of that group the two whose value are at a high are Folty and Fried. The Sox do like lefties though, so maybe Newcomb and Wisler going back could suffice. That would probably mean you have to lose Ender.

    So my complete baseless fan speculation would be Folty/Fried/Albies/Mallex or Wisler/Newcomb/Albies/Ender. There'd probably be a relief arm out of options like like Jose Ramirez, Chris Withrow, or Ian Kroll in there as well just because they could.
    Pretty good guesses, I think. Your take on 2B is probably part of the discussion internally right now.

    What would it take to add Frazier? He's only got one more year of control, but he'd fit here pretty well (especially if his contact improved a bit).

  22. #338
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,639
    Thanked in
    1,992 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    Huddy was speculating that such a deal might be expanded to include Todd Frazier. He's only got one more arb year. I think that makes a lot of sense.

    I do think your proposed deal is enough and if it comes together it will look something like that. That is stiff enough that it hurts, which is probably a signal that it's about right. Fills a bunch of needs and wants for the Sox, too.
    Personally, I'd do that deal. I like Albies a lot, but I think he is, in some degree, expendable. I truly believe Folty will be an anchor moving forward.

    But man: Sale, Teheran, Colon, Folty, Dickey is just a darn solid rotation.

    If we added, say, Ramos as our catcher and traded for Frazier, our lineup would be stout.

    Inciarte CF
    Swanson SS
    Freeman 1B
    Kemp LF
    Ramos C
    Frazier 3B
    Markakis RF
    Peterson 2B

  23. #339
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    I think the FO really likes Folty and sees him as a main piece going forward. I don't see him being moved.

  24. #340
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,651
    Thanked in
    1,034 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    I'm still not convinced that Mallex is the one to trade. Inciarte's value will likely never be higher and Mallex has the potential to be better than him. While Mallex wasn't exactly a huge prospect... he has been much more highly regarded than Ender ever was in the minors. Mallex seems to have a bit more pop... has much more speed... and has walked a a pretty good clip so far in the majors. He may not has as much defensive value, but he still has the potential to be a very good defensive CFer.
    Spot on. It's not impossible that Mallex actually has a little pop. He'll lead whatever league he plays in in triples for the next decade.

    And while Ender is an incredibly polished defensive player, he has optimized modest gifts with the bat. Exit velo was very low and launch angle flat, kind of the Willie Mays Hayes approach.

    Even with that defense, he didn't seem nearly as attractive when he was hitting a soft .250.

Similar Threads

  1. Official Prediction Thread: 2017 MLB Season (Braves Only)
    By thethe in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 07-10-2017, 12:06 PM
  2. Biggest movers of the 2017 MiLB season
    By UNCBlue012 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-14-2016, 06:38 AM
  3. 2016-2017 MLB Offseason Thread
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-03-2016, 07:23 PM
  4. 2016/2017 Free Agent Class
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-02-2016, 09:06 AM
  5. Fredi has been extent through 2016, Option for 2017
    By sturg33 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 07-18-2015, 08:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •