At least that middle-aged fat guy is engaging in the political process, right? That's a positive I'm choosing to take out of this cycle; you've got people who have never even bothered to vote before suddenly not just voting, but absolutely convicted of their candidate/position. Granted, many of the partisan arguments we've seen these 'groups' prop up over the past several months lack nuance (not to mention ... fact) and don't even remotely address policy, but if we chose to look at this more broadly as a metamorphosis then there's certainly more positives than negatives to be found. IMHO, this election is as transformative an event for the Internet and the procurement of media as 9/11 was.
I mentioned this in a post about a month ago now, but we shouldn't discourage people from pursuing ANY and ALL information on the Internet. That being said, we've got to do a better job educating people on bias and really knuckle down on the importance of the integrity of full-disclosure, especially as it pertains to all forms of media.
FBI announces it has 'not changed its conclusion' RE: Clinton investigation after reviewing Wiener's e-mails.
Now the FBI can move on to the Clinton pedo ring.
thank you weso1!
Looking forward to the next hit piece on how many codes of conduct Comey violated.
they are the most investigated people in history and all they got was a little blue dress that even the owner didn't want turned over
The Rude Pundit Retweeted Nick Corasaniti
Comey: "Never mind."
a little blue dress is all y'all got to show for this non sense.
Personally, I hope she takes your guns
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
i'm shocked
the people that just want something to happen no matter if there is evidence or not are upset that something didn't happen
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
Well, you referenced Keen's book - which was great - but penned during the middle of Web 2.0 when digital and social media were basically still fledglings. When people were still debating whether or not Wikipedia was a valid source.
I'd argue that we're firmly in Web 3.0 now, where information is essentially vetted vis-à-vis virality and things like social bookmarking. Crowd sourced critical thinking and fact-checking, if you will.
My comments were geared more towards establishing this baseline where information is approached with a 'two sides to every story' mentality, and further, where information itself is more important than the outlet that is producing/publishing it.