Higher than average turnouts are almost universally tied to races that are competitive and, generally, less to enthusiasm/interest.
If you want to claim all that 'energy' as Democratic, ok, but seems a bit disingenuous. That the Republicans thought they could even compete in Virginia, despite the changing demographics, says a lot to me. It also highlights some weaknesses that the party is still unable to address.
But you can take your 9 percentage points won entirely in population centers in Northern and Central Virginia and run a victory lap if it makes you feel that much better.
$29 million in ad buys overall, $7 million in the last week.
In Virginia.
I was hoping for numbers and not Steve Bannon quotes. But, given the thrust of that article, I'm sure Virginia Democrats would love to be thrown into the Stewart vs Kaine briar patch. And demagoguing MS-13 and NFL protesters bought Gillespie what, exactly?
When did the adoption of the Trump message narrow the race? How wide was the margin if Northam won by 9%? Seems like you're reaching pretty hard.
Trump just tweeted this congratulations to himself on last year's election. Maybe he's started trolling himself. Otherwise, this is why Republicans are going to continue losing big for the foreseeable future with Trump in charge. He simply cannot admit he's wrong and will continue to act the same and likely worse as the months and years go by, alienating more and more voters. There's no humbling him, everything is the Trump way or a lie:
I could certainly link some more articles to suit your finicky taste in quotes, but I was just trying to point you in the general direction of a sentiment that I've seen expressed in multiple publications over the course of the past few weeks.
Let's start here:
Do you dispute that Gillespie started playing Trumpian identity politics down the stretch? I think the time period is kinda irrelevant to the overriding point, but let's just say, for the sake of quantification, around 1 month.
Do you dispute that the race tightened when Gillespie changed his tactics?
Or do you believe that neither of these things happened?
I can give you numbers, or we can just look at the trend graph. Identifying what produced those changes is the fun part, not crunching numbers.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls...tham-6197.html
This so reminds me of people who argued we would have won Viet Nam if only the civilians allowed the military to ----- blah blah blah
(D) would have won 2010 mid terms if more people voted (D). They didn't vote (D) for reasons XY&Z.
Suck it up and admit y'all got your Trump apologist asses handed to you. For reasons X,Y and Z
...........................
Had the Braves not signed Bartolo Colon or relied on Jim Johnson ...
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
1st time Black mayors elected in GA last night #gapol:
Craig Newton of Norcross
Jonathan McCollar of Statesboro
Mary Parham Copeland of Milledgeville
Nancy Dennard of Quitman
Booker Gainor of Cairo
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.