I don't see us being in on McCutchen. Doesn't make a ton of sense. We already have every OF spot filled plus Mallex. McCutchen would only be around for 2 more years. While he's probably a good bet to rebound from last year some he's probably not going to be his MVP level self again. It would be a win now move when we're not really set up for that. He makes way more sense for the Nats.
I could only see McCutchen if the Braves were to deal for someone like Sale. If you make the commitment for one (both financially and in terms of acquisition cost) then you signal going all in and there's logic behind adding the other. Acquiring either one by himself would leave something to be desired.
From a marketing point of view McCutchen would make more than complete and total sense. I think he's a worthy gamble offensively ... I don't know about defense. Is he completely worthless in the outfield now?
Last edited by Hawk; 12-05-2016 at 01:13 PM.
Not sure I agree WAR is the best way to measure relief pitchers. In fact, not sure there is a great measure for relief pitchers besides FIP tbh.
Though I wholeheartedly agree that Melancon would be a bad target for this Braves team (and a great target for SF).
Edit: I see that your implying you weren't considering WAR.
WAR might overstate a closer but undervalues the BP collectively. Adding a dominate closer (relief pitcher) has more value than WAR could ever state. The pressure that it takes off the starters would be impossible to measure. plus the pressure the other team has knowing if it gets to the 6th inning without the lead, their chances of winning are greatly reduced.
I would have been ecstatic if we got MM at 4/50. No, I wouldn't want him at 4/62+ like the Giants did. But our pen was not as bad as the Giants either, so I understand their over pay.
If there is no determinable difference, then yes, it's all preconceived notions that makes people "feel" better. Like, "you can't go swimming for 20 minutes after you eat." The difference between a league average closer (something less than Johnson) and Melancon is really small. League average was something like 90% conversion rate in 1 run games last time I checked. Considering the best is not 100%, but something less than that and that the team will still win games that the closer blows; it is really stupid for a non world series contender to pay money for a closer.
Maybe if the team had just a terrible bullpen and a good closer would make a big difference, but that isn't the case here. For the Giants, Melancon makes a little bit of sense.
"Yes, I did think Aldrich was good UNTIL I SAW HIM PLAY. "- thethe
that is the problem with Statistics. people who don't deal with them regularly, start to believe them. I can make a data set say 10 COMPLETELY different things and all be TRUE. I do it every day and I am dealing with money, not human performance. so because a HUMAN element of a game can't be measured, then you should completely disregard it and thus make decisions without that being a part of your evaluation. We should only make decisions based on spread sheets and computer models. Also, the nationals are Series champs 3 of the last 5 years.. Where's my Stats, Bro!
GovClintonTyree (12-05-2016)