Nope. That's the power of the leftists platform.
"We are tolerant (of those that vote with us). If you disagree with us you must be intolerant."
It never enters their mind that they are being intolerant. That's as impossible as a minority being a racist, it just can't happen.
i don't give a flying **** about the statement
you can name it whatever you want
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
But that runs both ways. I am in my 60s and I remember when the whole political correctness argument ran the other way. If you weren't in favor of bombing the Vietnamese back to the Stone Age, you were considered a communist sympathizer. The whole Red Scare thing was alive and well and ruined many careers in the 1950s and 1960s.
I somewhat agree with the effect of the original article. My problem is "Where does it end?" I know sturg33 will come in with his property rights argument that any business should be able to refuse any customer (and while I don't agree with that, there is an intellectual argument that supports that stance), but in reality, once you enter a free market economy that promotes the free movement of business without barriers, you make a tacit agreement to operate totally in the marketplace. It seems here is that some supposed free marketeers believe in the concept of the free market only to the extent it doesn't offend their sensibilities. I can see all sorts of enterprises using the cover of religion to justify a number of activities that will further divide this country by allowing religious (and I use the term very loosely) to basically secede from the social contract.
But there's no question that high profile confrontations should have been avoided given the volatile nature of the issue.
thethe, you better look up the definition of tyranny.
Yes, it's clear that you don't care at all about forcing people to think in a singular way which is closely aligned with how you feel is the right way. And of course you don't think there is anything g wrong with that. I very much understand your stance and I'm glad it's out in the open.
cool
glad we could go take that time to make sure i'm on the record for not being on the side of thinking it's ok to treat people as 2nd class citizens.
what a dishonor to be on the record for that
i'm so ashamed
but your slippery slope argument and false use of tyranny was such a blast
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
It's not thinking in a singular way! It's asking people to recognize the rights that people have to participate in the economy. goldfly isn't saying everyone has to order vanilla ice cream. He's saying everyone should be allowed in the ice cream shop to order the flavor they prefer. Do I have that right goldfly?
Of course everyone should be allowed in the shop. I've never said otherwise. But not everyone should be forced to feel everyone should be allowed. I would nevery be in favor of taking someone property rights away or the freedom to live free of physical harm as well as extreme mental harm.
But in now way should people ever be forced to think a certain way even if their beliefs are repugnant.
The statement literally was not allowing the freedom for someone to hate. That is legislation of thought is it not?
Hawk (12-09-2016)
Everyone has the freedom to believe what they want to believe, but there are--and should be--limits to how people act of those beliefs. I am not a racist, but some are. If I believe that people of a different race are ruining society, should I be allowed to chastise them and make their lives miserable. There is a distinct difference between what one believes and how one acts. Just because I don't believe that a certain stretch of road shouldn't have a 30 mph speed limit doesn't give me the right to drive 60. It's called a social contract. We all give up something to gain something else.