User Tag List

Page 1 of 26 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 506

Thread: Braves trade Mallex and Simmons to M's for Gohara and Burrows

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,335
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,277 Times in 822 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Braves trade Mallex and Simmons to M's for Gohara and Burrows

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/0...e-simmons.html

    They turned one of their only expendable position assets into even more pitching. Gohara probably slots into the Braves list at about 10-15, and Burrows is a BP guy all the way.

    Seems light for Mallex and Simmons. I suppose I dramatically overestimated Mallex's trade value.

    I think the M's got a steal in this one.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 01-11-2017 at 02:44 PM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-11-2017)

  3. #2
    High School Draftee
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 24 Times in 9 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mallex Smith traded


  4. #3
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,399
    Thanks
    837
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 1,972 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Never heard of them... numbers look decent thought

  5. #4
    Arizona Fall Leaguer Freshmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    180
    Thanks
    232
    Thanked 105 Times in 46 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hmm I dunno anything about the guys we got. Are they any good? Moderately surprised we'd trade Mallex away like that. I kinda figured he'd be a good replacement for Neck at some point.

  6. #5
    A Chip Off the Old Rock Julio3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,934
    Thanks
    5,981
    Thanked 7,478 Times in 3,749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Fangraphs has Gohara as a future bullpen guy. Not sure how I feel about that.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Julio3000 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-11-2017)

  8. #6
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,335
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,277 Times in 822 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Freshmaker View Post
    Hmm I dunno anything about the guys we got. Are they any good? Moderately surprised we'd trade Mallex away like that. I kinda figured he'd be a good replacement for Neck at some point.
    Deal is basically Gohara for Mallex (Simmons and Burrows are pretty much a wash). The M's got themselves a 2-3 WAR CFer under control for 5 years by only giving up the equivalent of Kyle Muller.

    Seems like a clear win for the M's. Bad trade by Coppy. He essentially gave an average CFer away for nothing.

  9. #7
    A Chip Off the Old Rock Julio3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,934
    Thanks
    5,981
    Thanked 7,478 Times in 3,749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I assumed that unless Mallex developed some pop there was no chance we'd see him in the same outfield as Ender. Interesting move. Time will tell, I guess.

  10. #8
    Where's My Cup of Coffee? NYCBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,158
    Thanks
    758
    Thanked 187 Times in 115 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Julio3000 View Post
    I assumed that unless Mallex developed some pop there was no chance we'd see him in the same outfield as Ender. Interesting move. Time will tell, I guess.
    I guess this means Enciarte is looked at as a long term piece. Also, I thought this board thought Mallet had more value than he did in real life.

  11. #9
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,399
    Thanks
    837
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 1,972 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mis-management of assets probably.

    I'd assume we'd have been much better off by trading Ender.

    Mallex + Return for Ender >>>>>>> Ender + Return for Mallex

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to sturg33 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (01-11-2017)

  13. #10
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    15,960
    Thanks
    1,020
    Thanked 2,594 Times in 1,812 Posts
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This trade likely rotates around Gohara. He's got potential, and just last year seemed to start figuring out how to pitch
    AJ does all the other things just as well if not better than Mac - zbhargrove

    I don't think Nolan Ryan should be a poster child for mechanics - SAV

  14. #11
    A Chip Off the Old Rock Julio3000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,934
    Thanks
    5,981
    Thanked 7,478 Times in 3,749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NYCBrave View Post
    I guess this means Enciarte is looked at as a long term piece. Also, I thought this board thought Mallet had more value than he did in real life.
    I'm inclined to agree, though I liked the guy. He needs more pop or more OBP to make it to the next level. I think we picked the right guy. Don't love this trade at first blush, though.

  15. #12
    2019. Definitely 2019. GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    The Emerald City
    Posts
    3,231
    Thanks
    1,113
    Thanked 1,159 Times in 704 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NYCBrave View Post
    I guess this means Enciarte is looked at as a long term piece. Also, I thought this board thought Mallet had more value than he did in real life.
    Damn.

    I did, I'm sure. I really liked the guy. And Simmons...damn.

    Both GMs have entered the rosterbation phase of the offseason. That gives Seattle six center fielders and God knows Atlanta doesn't need any more A level pitching.

    Maybe they'll trade them back for each other on 2/1.

    Damn.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GovClintonTyree For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (01-11-2017),jpx7 (01-11-2017)

  17. #13
    Expects Huge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,214
    Thanks
    742
    Thanked 4,233 Times in 2,581 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    This trade likely rotates around Gohara. He's got potential, and just last year seemed to start figuring out how to pitch
    Yeah. Gohara is the highest upside player in this trade. Still seems like a light return for Mallex and Shae.

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    Braves1976 (01-11-2017),dak (01-11-2017),JohnAdcox (01-11-2017),jpx7 (01-11-2017)

  19. #14
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    5,249
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 1,261 Times in 821 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Mis-management of assets probably.

    I'd assume we'd have been much better off by trading Ender.

    Mallex + Return for Ender >>>>>>> Ender + Return for Mallex
    Not necessarily. As pure and simple assets, maybe. But in terms of fielding the best team, if we assume Mallex is roughly a 2ish WAR guy (don't know how you could assume more yet), then Ender is a clear and impactful upgrade from him at CF. So the pieces you got in return for Ender would have to be that much better than the guys they're replacing. So even if you could get three 3-WAR guys for Ender, that doesn't automatically mean you're better off than you would have been getting a much lesser return for Mallex and keeping Ender.

    That said, I don't think this was a good trade.

  20. #15
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,399
    Thanks
    837
    Thanked 3,180 Times in 1,972 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Not necessarily. As pure and simple assets, maybe. But in terms of fielding the best team, if we assume Mallex is roughly a 2ish WAR guy (don't know how you could assume more yet), then Ender is a clear and impactful upgrade from him at CF. So the pieces you got in return for Ender would have to be that much better than the guys they're replacing. So even if you could get three 3-WAR guys for Ender, that doesn't automatically mean you're better off than you would have been getting a much lesser return for Mallex and keeping Ender.

    That said, I don't think this was a good trade.
    I think we could have gotten fair value for Ender... but below-fair value for Mallex.

    I could, of course, be wrong

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to sturg33 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (01-11-2017)

  22. #16
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    5,682
    Thanks
    1,503
    Thanked 818 Times in 585 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm sure injuries are the only reason we traded Simmons. Dude just couldn't stay healthy.

  23. #17
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    5,863
    Thanks
    1,732
    Thanked 1,838 Times in 1,121 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Deal is basically Gohara for Mallex (Simmons and Burrows are pretty much a wash). The M's got themselves a 2-3 WAR CFer under control for 5 years by only giving up the equivalent of Kyle Muller.

    Seems like a clear win for the M's. Bad trade by Coppy. He essentially gave an average CFer away for nothing.

    But I thought the Braves were all about that WAR and surplus value projections. Please look into your crystal ball and tell me what the surplus value is of these players.
    "Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once its realized that our liberty and wealth are in jeopardy"

    - Crazy Uncle Ron.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to cajunrevenge For This Useful Post:

    Knucksie (01-11-2017)

  25. #18
    Called Up to the Major Leagues striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,726
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked 780 Times in 433 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, I don't like this at all. I agree that Burrows and Simmons are about a push so this is really about Mallex for Gohara. If Mallex had a lower ceiling I could understand this. But with his speed and track record of getting on base in the minors, he has the potential to be a very dangerous leadoff hitter. Trading a major league ready CFer who could end up being one of the game's better leadoff hitters for a pitcher that hasn't even made the jump to AA isn't something I like. Gohara's ceiling value is probably similar to Mallex's ceiling value but Gohara is a tremendously higher risk.

    I'm unimpressed.

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    Braves1976 (01-11-2017),JohnAdcox (01-11-2017)

  27. #19
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    5,337
    Thanks
    520
    Thanked 1,285 Times in 813 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    tells me that Coppy is thinking about keeping the farm restocked. is he about to move some pitching for something?? I don't like the trade initially.. I think Mallex has big upside to become a better player than Ender.

  28. #20
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,335
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,277 Times in 822 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    But I thought the Braves were all about that WAR and surplus value projections. Please look into your crystal ball and tell me what the surplus value is of these players.
    Actually, I have repeatedly said the Braves are one of the few teams still clinging to some forms of stone aged thinking. This trade exemplifies that thinking perfectly, and is why it's going to be widely viewed as a bad trade from the Braves perspective.

    They gave up ~$50M in surplus value with Mallex (10+ WAR over 5 years at a total salary of ~$25M) for another lottery ticket A ball pitcher. This is a terrible trade.

    I know you can't wrap your head around surplus value, but that's how transactions are evaluated by the majority of people in the game.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 01-11-2017 at 03:16 PM.

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (01-11-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •