Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 90

Thread: Great new charts illustrating OF defense

  1. #21
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    But against and average defender (using Enscheff's 82 figure), Heyward is 27 hits better, not 54 (Kemp IS awful, no question).

    As to the value of defense in War, to rate oWar and dWar as equal, then you are saying that an OF with a 3 dWar and a -1.7 oWar would have a monetary value of somewhere along the lines of $7M x (~1.3) = $9.1M and I can't buy that. I think there are many "defensive whizzes" in the minors that never sniff the ML because they can't hit a lick and if they do get to the ML they never play enough to have a 3 dWar impact. Heyward is an anomaly having tantalized with enough offense to get a big contract on faith which requires the Cubs to run him out there every day instead of using him as a defensive replacement.
    First we need to understand that you can't add oWAR and dWAR together to get a players WAR. They usually add the position adjustment and playing time bonus to both of those stats if you are getting them from bRef.

    With that being said Fredy Galvis is an interesting player.

    He was -1.8 WAR offensively and +2.2 WAR defensively in 2016. Add in the playing time bonus and he was a 2.4 fWAR player. He just signed a 4.4 million contract in his 2nd year of arbitration. Year 2 generally represents 40% of a market value contract. So his FA value is essentially 11 million.

    And just because oWAR = dWAR on the diamond doesn't mean it's equal on the open market. It's clear that it's not. Just look at Ender's recent contract. Even Heyward's contract is someone essentially paying for his offensive history and not his defense. Defensive first players is the new OBP. It's a market inefficiency.

  2. #22
    Playing the Waiting Game blueagleace1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    884
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    155 Posts
    Great post Enscheff, very informative chart! Did you happen to look at Ender's?
    "Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon"

  3. #23
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by blueagleace1 View Post
    Great post Enscheff, very informative chart! Did you happen to look at Ender's?

  4. #24
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Just saw these charts on Baseball Savant. I'll post links to the images of base hits allowed to drop by Heyward vs Kemp.

    Heyward:



    Kemp:



    You can easily see just how many hits Kemp allowed to fall in the Easy, Routine, and Tough ranges compared to an elite defender like Heyward. These charts do a wonderful job of illustrating how Kemp costs a team 20+ runs on defense when he lets all those fly balls drop. Many of those become extra-base hits and cause considerable damage.
    here is OP to go along with TheWupk ender post.

  5. #25
    Playing the Waiting Game blueagleace1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    884
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    155 Posts
    I'm not trying to contradict or say Kemp is a good defender or anything along those lines but I do think this shows how bad his hips really are because at one point (pretty recently) Kemp was a Gold Glove award winner (actually twice I think) in centerfield for quite some time.
    "Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon"

  6. #26
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by blueagleace1 View Post
    I'm not trying to contradict or say Kemp is a good defender or anything along those lines but I do think this shows how bad his hips really are because at one point (pretty recently) Kemp was a Gold Glove award winner (actually twice I think) in centerfield for quite some time.
    To be fair he won it the same way Nate McClouth won his.

  7. #27
    Playing the Waiting Game blueagleace1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    884
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    To be fair he won it the same way Nate McClouth won his.
    Right, but no matter how he won it, it shows he was at one point a pretty good defender and how bad hips can really effect his defensive ability.
    "Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon"

  8. #28
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    But against and average defender (using Enscheff's 82 figure), Heyward is 27 hits better, not 54 (Kemp IS awful, no question).

    As to the value of defense in War, to rate oWar and dWar as equal, then you are saying that an OF with a 3 dWar and a -1.7 oWar would have a monetary value of somewhere along the lines of $7M x (~1.3) = $9.1M and I can't buy that. I think there are many "defensive whizzes" in the minors that never sniff the ML because they can't hit a lick and if they do get to the ML they never play enough to have a 3 dWar impact. Heyward is an anomaly having tantalized with enough offense to get a big contract on faith which requires the Cubs to run him out there every day instead of using him as a defensive replacement.
    Run prevention and run creation are of equal importance. But run prevention is a product of pitching and defense. From the evident role of pitching in run prevention it is obvious that defensive WAR's overall importance is significantly less than the overall importance of offensive WAR.

    But...but...but....it is possible that the dispersion of defensive value across players is much larger than the dispersion of offensive value. It could be that compared to league average that a great defensive player is equivalent to a .400 hitter compared to a .250 hitter. So it is theoretically possible (and I'm not taking a position on this) that the defensive WAR of a great defensive player is greater than the offensive WAR of a great offensive player even though in the overall scheme of things overall defensive WAR has to be less than overall offensive WAR.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 01-30-2017 at 09:21 PM.

  9. #29
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,645
    Thanked in
    1,029 Posts
    I've certainly been one of the most vocal about the relative impact of defense and my sense that it is overvalued. I'll have to look at this stuff and see if it convinces me.

    Off the top, we're comparing raw data for a right fielder and a partial left fielder. Did they have the same amount of time, chances? I know Kemp played pretty close to a full slate. Secondly, as others have said, you're comparing Kemp to the best corner OF in the game. What's normal and how do they decide that? And why are these numbers so incredibly different from inside edge, which more or less attempts to classify the exact same thing?

  10. #30
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Based on the Kemp and Heyward data, I would imagine an average defender with 0 runs produced defensively would have only allowed ~82 hits given the same number of chances. You can look it up easily enough yourself though.

    According to Smoot, Kemp allowed 109 hits, while Heyward allowed 55 hits. That difference of 54 hits is almost exactly the difference in their defensive run values. Assuming each missed ball to the OF costs a team ~1 run (which seems reasonable), it passes the sniff test.
    So Heyward's defense relative to an average outfielder is 27 hits. Assuming most are doubles close to 50 bases.

    The value of 54 hits and 100 bases for a hitter receiving a full-season's worth of at bats is roughly 45 points on his OBP, and 75 points on his slugging percentage. Or about 120 points to his OPS. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Or if we want to stick to a Heyward-Kemp comparison, Kemp would need an OPS about 240 points higher than Heyward to make up the defensive difference.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 01-30-2017 at 10:50 PM.

  11. #31
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Run prevention and run creation are of equal importance. But run prevention is a product of pitching and defense. From the evident role of pitching in run prevention it is obvious that defensive WAR's overall importance is significantly less than the overall importance of offensive WAR.

    But...but...but....it is possible that the dispersion of defensive value across players is much larger than the dispersion of offensive value. It could be that compared to league average that a great defensive player is equivalent to a .400 hitter compared to a .250 hitter. So it is theoretically possible (and I'm not taking a position on this) that the defensive WAR of a great defensive player is greater than the offensive WAR of a great offensive player even though in the overall scheme of things overall defensive WAR has to be less than overall offensive WAR.
    The defensive WAR of the top defensive players is generally not all that close to the offensive WAR of the top offensive players.

  12. #32
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    So Heyward's defense relative to an average outfielder is 27 hits. Assuming most are doubles close to 50 bases.

    The value of 54 hits and 100 bases for a hitter receiving a full-season's worth of at bats is roughly 45 points on his OBP, and 75 points on his slugging percentage. Or about 120 points to his OPS. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Or if we want to stick to a Heyward-Kemp comparison, Kemp would need an OPS about 240 points higher than Heyward to make up the defensive difference.
    So,correct me if I'm wrong, but you're saying that in 2016 Kemp would have equal value to Heyward (assuming Heyward is static to actual) if he had an OPS of .631+.240=.871 even taking into consideration Kemp's awful defense and Heyward's superior defense? And, if Heyward had provided the same offense in 2016 that he did in STL in 2015 (.797 OPS) while having the same defensive value then Kemp would need to hit .797+.240=1.037 OPS to be equal in value?

    If that could be quantified on a broad basis (not just Kemp/Heyward) then I think that would be a very interesting way of establishing relative value.

    Kemp had a combined OPS in 2016 of .803 (.855 in Atlanta)

    Kemp made $21.75M (paid by a number of teams)
    Heyward made $21.67M

    I am certainly NOT arguing that Kemp is a better player than Heyward (he's not by a long shot). However, there are scenarios where he could be a better value.

    Let's say Kemp and Heyward mirror their 2016 numbers in 2017. Kemp again makes $21.75M but Heyward makes $28.2M, the .068 OPS difference (.871-.803) probably still justifies the $6.5M payroll difference, but the value between the two is much closer. And for the Braves, on the hook for $15M for Kemp, the relative value of Kemp could be more valuable than if they had Heyward.
    Last edited by Horsehide Harry; 01-30-2017 at 11:52 PM.

  13. #33
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GovClintonTyree View Post
    I've certainly been one of the most vocal about the relative impact of defense and my sense that it is overvalued. I'll have to look at this stuff and see if it convinces me.

    Off the top, we're comparing raw data for a right fielder and a partial left fielder. Did they have the same amount of time, chances? I know Kemp played pretty close to a full slate. Secondly, as others have said, you're comparing Kemp to the best corner OF in the game. What's normal and how do they decide that? And why are these numbers so incredibly different from inside edge, which more or less attempts to classify the exact same thing?
    This is directly from MLB's statcast. People have talked about more public statcast data. This is it. It's in every ball park and this is what we will need to take defensive metrics to the next level. You can go to the players page on baseball savant and they have a graph for plays made as well which are ranked in the same way. And someone mentioned earlier that there was a difference of like 10 attempts between the two players. With that being said it determines the difficulty by the % that a play is made across all MLB ofers.

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/catch_rates

    It's an interactive map to show all types of plays for an OF. Using time in area measured with the distance the player was from it. For example a ball that is in the air for 4 seconds and is 60 feet from a defender is caught 57% of the time. So essentially that play is considered average or routine in the graphs above.

  14. #34
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    So Heyward's defense relative to an average outfielder is 27 hits. Assuming most are doubles close to 50 bases.

    The value of 54 hits and 100 bases for a hitter receiving a full-season's worth of at bats is roughly 45 points on his OBP, and 75 points on his slugging percentage. Or about 120 points to his OPS. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Or if we want to stick to a Heyward-Kemp comparison, Kemp would need an OPS about 240 points higher than Heyward to make up the defensive difference.
    That's a decent correlation for some folks. I think the 50 bases may be a little too much. For example a double was worth 1.242 runs in 2016. If Heyward saved 25 of them then he would of been a +30 defender. He actually came out to +18 DRS and +20 UZR. So it's more likely that it was somewhere around 16 doubles or 32 bases. Somewhere in that ballpark. But still the point remains. If Heyward is saving 27 more hits than the average corner outfielder then that is a tremendous amount. I've said this for awhile but if Heyward or anyone else were to save 5 doubles a month then what's really the big deal? The same big deal if a hitter gets 5 extra doubles a month. Those things add up over a full season and the difference is pretty evident.

  15. #35
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    The defensive WAR of the top defensive players is generally not all that close to the offensive WAR of the top offensive players.
    Yeah there is generally a 3X multiplier difference. Which is why most suggest 3 years of defensive data is worth 1 year of offensive data as far as sample sizes go. It's why elite hitters with average defense will always be more valuable than average hitters with elite defense. That's just a given.

  16. #36
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So,correct me if I'm wrong, but you're saying that in 2016 Kemp would have equal value to Heyward (assuming Heyward is static to actual) if he had an OPS of .631+.240=.871 even taking into consideration Kemp's awful defense and Heyward's superior defense? And, if Heyward had provided the same offense in 2016 that he did in STL in 2015 (.797 OPS) while having the same defensive value then Kemp would need to hit .797+.240=1.037 OPS to be equal in value?

    If that could be quantified on a broad basis (not just Kemp/Heyward) then I think that would be a very interesting way of establishing relative value.

    Kemp had a combined OPS in 2016 of .803 (.855 in Atlanta)

    Kemp made $21.75M (paid by a number of teams)
    Heyward made $21.67M

    I am certainly NOT arguing that Kemp is a better player than Heyward (he's not by a long shot). However, there are scenarios where he could be a better value.

    Let's say Kemp and Heyward mirror their 2016 numbers in 2017. Kemp again makes $21.75M but Heyward makes $28.2M, the .068 OPS difference (.871-.803) probably still justifies the $6.5M payroll difference, but the value between the two is much closer. And for the Braves, on the hook for $15M for Kemp, the relative value of Kemp could be more valuable than if they had Heyward.
    Yes. That's the point I was making.

  17. #37
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    It should be noted that the graphs being discussed here only capture the part of an outfielder's defensive value having to do with range. Heyward and Inciarte both have very good arms which add to their defensive value.

    And there are more subtle considerations in favor of strong defenders that may elude quantification for a while. For example, a strong defender saves wear-and-tear on the pitching staff by increasing the number of outs per pitch. More obviously, a strong outfielder allows some adjustments to positioning that minimizes the negative effects of a weak outfielder.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 01-31-2017 at 09:30 AM.

  18. #38
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,645
    Thanked in
    1,029 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    This is directly from MLB's statcast. People have talked about more public statcast data. This is it. It's in every ball park and this is what we will need to take defensive metrics to the next level. You can go to the players page on baseball savant and they have a graph for plays made as well which are ranked in the same way. And someone mentioned earlier that there was a difference of like 10 attempts between the two players. With that being said it determines the difficulty by the % that a play is made across all MLB ofers.

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/catch_rates

    It's an interactive map to show all types of plays for an OF. Using time in area measured with the distance the player was from it. For example a ball that is in the air for 4 seconds and is 60 feet from a defender is caught 57% of the time. So essentially that play is considered average or routine in the graphs above.
    Thanks for the additional knowledge. Regarding your example, I wouldn't consider a ball caught 57% of the time "routine." 95-something would be routine. I would think the ball you described would be a difficult play if half get there and half don't.

    Like I said, I will look at all this when I have a little time. It certainly seems like a better way to address the defense/range question.

    One other thought...how would it treat a defender or team that was superior at positioning fielders?

  19. #39
    Vencer a Los Doyers GovClintonTyree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Lake Hartwell
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,645
    Thanked in
    1,029 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    It should be noted that the graphs being discussed here only capture the part of an outfielder's defensive value having to do with range.
    How is the arm rated? (Real question.) And the other question, the one I asked thewupk - how does this measure/reward/not a fielder who is superior at positioning himself? I'm thinking about Cal Ripken on that comment, as it was always said that his range was a little short but because he knew what he was doing, he was always in the right place.

  20. #40
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    So no ball feel for a hit within 30 feet of these 3 OF, regardless of hang time. That seems hard to believe.

Similar Threads

  1. Updated Farm Rankings + Updated Prospect Valuation Charts (Fangraphs)
    By BeanieAntics in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-12-2018, 04:01 PM
  2. First data for Freeman's defense at 3b
    By Enscheff in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 07-23-2017, 10:13 PM
  3. GDT: Braves vs Sox...Sh*tty Defense Edition
    By jsebe10 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 07-09-2016, 05:44 PM
  4. Great article on Andrelton Simmons defense
    By Teheran_49 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-17-2013, 09:22 AM
  5. All Defense Team
    By Heyward in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-04-2013, 08:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •