Page 1 of 64 1231151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 1271

Thread: Official pre-Draft thread

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,679
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts

    Official pre-Draft thread

    It's not far off and nobody has been talking about it so I thought it would be a good idea to start one up. Jordan Kendall is off to a hot start. .429ba 4hr 10rbi in just 5 games and has more walks than strikeouts.
    Last edited by rico43; 06-12-2017 at 08:27 PM.

  2. #2
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    It's not far off and nobody has been talking about it so I thought it would be a good idea to start one up. Jordan Kendall is off to a hot start. .429ba 4hr 10rbi in just 5 games and has more walks than strikeouts.
    In before it doesn't matter because something something Swanson something something winning

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    Preacher (04-11-2017), zedsdead (04-11-2017)

  4. #3
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,137
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,484
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,791
    Thanked in
    2,709 Posts
    JJ Schwarz makes a lot of sense. Catcher is a real weakness throughout the organization.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  5. #4
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,569
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    We definitely need a high school pitcher who will never sniff the majors. Haven't had one of those drafted for almost a year now I think.

  6. #5
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    It's not far off and nobody has been talking about it so I thought it would be a good idea to start one up. Jordan Kendall is off to a hot start. .429ba 4hr 10rbi in just 5 games and has more walks than strikeouts.
    ? We're 33 games into the season now. Kendall is slashing .309/.394/.604 with 10 HR. The problem is, he's striking out a ton and doesn't have a ton of steals. I'm not sure I want him at 5.

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    JJ Schwarz makes a lot of sense. Catcher is a real weakness throughout the organization.
    His stock has crashed. He's hitting terribly this year and has taken a significant step back every year he's been in school. And there were already questions about him sticking at catcher. Almost certainly not a 1st round pick at this point.

  8. #7
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    JJ Schwarz makes a lot of sense. Catcher is a real weakness throughout the organization.
    His stock has fallen really far. He might not even be a 2nd round pick at this point.

    Kendall actually might be there at 5. Greene, McKay, Beck, Bukaukas, Faedo, could all go before him. Not sure if we'd take a college hitter even if available.

  9. #8
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NinersSBChamps View Post
    We definitely need a high school pitcher who will never sniff the majors. Haven't had one of those drafted for almost a year now I think.
    This was funny.

  10. #9
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    I think Kendall will be there at 5, I just don't want to take him. I think my preferred order as of now is:

    Beck
    Adell
    Lewis
    Faedo

  11. #10
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,569
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    If this guy is anyway related to Jason Kendall then I want him.

  12. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,256
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,057
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,693
    Thanked in
    3,881 Posts
    Steven Williams in the 2nd please!
    Ivermectin Man

  13. #12
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,430
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    I think it is instructive to compare the 2015 and 2016 drafts. The first rule of course is to pick good players and that applies to all drafts. But there are elements of strategy and emphasis that differ from draft to draft. Even before the "returns" are fully in, it appears likely that the 2015 draft will turn out to be the better one. Here are some takeaways:

    1) The first pick. We had the #3 in 2016 and the #14 in 2015. We went for highest upside in 2015. I understand the strategy behind what we did in 2016. But the outcomes so far reinforce my view that you really want to go with upside as your primary consideration with your first pick.

    2) We had a second first round pick in 2015 but none in 2016. This was due to Santana hitting free agency. We did very well with that pick by selecting Soroka. This reinforces another one of my beliefs, which is that we should not be afraid to hold on to a player in his free agency season. Needless to say players have more motivation in these circumstances. But more importantly, the draft pick associated with losing a quality player is very valuable.

    3) We had 2 second and 2 third round picks in both 2015 and 2016. Over the years, we have done best with high school position players in this part of the draft and worst with high school pitchers. In 2015, we drafted 2 high school position players, 1 college pitcher and 1 high school pitcher with those picks. In 2016, we drafted 2 high school pitchers, 1 college pitcher and 1 college position player. Without going into detail regarding the identity of individual players, I like the mix we took in 2015 with these picks much better.

    4) Rounds 4-10 are the middle rounds. Players taken here are less likely to be stars, but a good draft will still yield a couple major league players from these rounds. Historically, we have done much better with college pitchers in this part of the draft. In 2015, we took 7 straight college pitchers in rounds 4 to 10. In 2016, we took a mix with more emphasis on college hitters. We did very well in 2015, with both Weigel and Withrow taken in this part of the draft. We need to go back to the 2015 template.

    5) Beyond the 10th round it is a crap shoot. I have felt, however, that we have been a bit "lazy" over the years in not working hard to identify some high school players worth taking in the late rounds. In 2015, we did take some interesting high schoolers in this part of the draft in 2015 (Keller, Suarez, Hellinger). In 2016, we were very college heavy again.

    As outlined above, there is a bit of a "template" that increases your chances of success in various portions of the draft. I thought we executed it extremely well in 2015. In 2016, not so much.

    So my wish for 2017 is we go back to the 2015 game plan. Highest upside with the first pick. High school position players in rounds 2 & 3. College pitchers in the middle rounds. And a sprinkling of high school players in the late rounds.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 04-11-2017 at 09:34 AM.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    NYCBrave (04-13-2017)

  15. #13
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,557
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,520
    Thanked in
    1,477 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    His stock has crashed. He's hitting terribly this year and has taken a significant step back every year he's been in school. And there were already questions about him sticking at catcher. Almost certainly not a 1st round pick at this point.
    Yeah, I'm still stunned when people bring him up. As a UF and Braves fan, I want nothing to do with him. He wasn't even in Baseball America's top 100 recently. He has zero chance to stick behind the plate. He throws changeups to second and isn't athletic behind the plate at all. His swing is a mess, the power has almost completely evaporated. I don't want him with any of our picks in the top five rounds.

  16. #14
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,557
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,520
    Thanked in
    1,477 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I think it is instructive to compare the 2015 and 2016 drafts. The first rule of course is to pick good players and that applies to all drafts. But there are elements of strategy and emphasis that differ from draft to draft. Even before the "returns" are fully in, it appears likely that the 2015 draft will turn out to be the better one. Here are some takeaways:

    1) The first pick. We had the #3 in 2016 and the #14 in 2015. We went for highest upside in 2015. I understand the strategy behind what we did in 2016. But the outcomes so far reinforce my view that you really want to go with upside as your primary consideration with your first pick.

    2) We had a second first round pick in 2015 but none in 2016. This was due to Santana hitting free agency. We did very well with that pick by selecting Soroka. This reinforces another one of my beliefs, which is that we should not be afraid to hold on to a player in his free agency season. Needless to say players have more motivation in these circumstances. But more importantly, the draft pick associated losing a quality player is very valuable.

    3) We had 2 second and 2 third round picks in both 2015 and 2016. Over the years, we done very well with high school position players in this part of the draft. In 2015, we drafted 2 high school position players, 1 college pitcher and 1 high school pitcher with those picks. In 2016, we drafted 2 high school pitchers, 1 college pitcher and 1 college position player. Without going into detail regarding the identity of individual players, I like the mix we took in 2015 with these picks much better.

    4) Rounds 4-10 are the middle rounds. Players taken here are less likely to be stars, but a good draft will still yield a couple major league players from these rounds. Historically, we have done much better with college pitchers in this part of the draft. In 2015, we took 7 straight college pitchers in rounds 4 to 10. In 2016, we took a mix with more emphasis on college hitters. We did very well in 2015, with both Weigel and Withrow taken in this part of the draft. We need to go back to the 2015 template.

    5) Beyond the 10th round it is a crap shoot. I have felt, however, that we have been a bit "lazy" over the years in not working hard to identify some high school players worth taking in the late rounds. In 2015, we did take some interesting high schoolers in this part of the draft in 2015 (Keller, Suarez, Hellinger). In 2016, we were very college heavy again.

    As outlined above, there is a bit of a "template" that increases your chances of success in various portions of the draft. I thought we executed it extremely well in 2015. In 2016, not so much.

    So my wish for 2017 is we go back to the 2015 game plan.
    Good recap, and I agree with what you wrote. Regardless of what the front office wants to do, I think their hand might be forced to go high upside and BPA at 5 this year since they won't be able to float someone down to their second round pick. Or at least it will be a lot harder to do.

  17. #15
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    Unless we trade for some Competetive Balance Round picks, I think we go a little more straight up with our pick in terms of BPA. We don't really have the pool to get as creative as some other teams and as such I'd expect at least a near-slot deal at 5. My preferences at this point would be:

    1) Greene (never going to happen)
    2) Lewis
    3) Beck
    4) Kendall
    5) McKay

  18. #16
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,679
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    ? We're 33 games into the season now. Kendall is slashing .309/.394/.604 with 10 HR. The problem is, he's striking out a ton and doesn't have a ton of steals. I'm not sure I want him at 5.
    The website I checked I guess wasn't updated. I'm not worried about steals. Hitting over .300 with double digits is pretty intriguing though. I agree about the strikeouts. I still see him as a possible top 5 pick though I like Lewis and Beck better.

  19. #17
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    297
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    419
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    I think its hard to have a 'template' for a draft.

    Like its great to say my template is HS positional players in rounds 2-3; but what happens when the draft rolls around and you don't like the HS bats that are available in those spots? A lot of people on the board don't love taking HS pitchers with first round picks and want guys with upside --- yet Soroka is one of the best picks we've made recently.

    I think the best template is just BPA almost all the way through, especially when you don't have the extra money to manipulate the board. So at that point you're really just trusting the scouts to find that BPA. I really have zero preference if its a college hitter, a HS arm or anything in between, I just want the best players. Baseball is Monopoly - its all about collecting the best and most assets.

  20. #18
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,430
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
    I think its hard to have a 'template' for a draft.

    Like its great to say my template is HS positional players in rounds 2-3; but what happens when the draft rolls around and you don't like the HS bats that are available in those spots? A lot of people on the board don't love taking HS pitchers with first round picks and want guys with upside --- yet Soroka is one of the best picks we've made recently.

    I think the best template is just BPA almost all the way through, especially when you don't have the extra money to manipulate the board. So at that point you're really just trusting the scouts to find that BPA. I really have zero preference if its a college hitter, a HS arm or anything in between, I just want the best players. Baseball is Monopoly - its all about collecting the best and most assets.
    I don't mean for the template to be so inflexible as to preclude taking certain types of players in certain parts of the draft. But I do think if historically you tend to have the most success with high school hitters in rounds 2 and 3 and the least success with high school pitchers in those rounds you should take that information into account. I was really struck at the time of the 2015 draft how much it conformed to that kind of analysis. Given the 2016 draft, it is obvious that the Braves are not rigidly adhering to a template of that kind. The point of my post was that the success of the 2015 draft reinforces the case I laid out (which is based on data from prior drafts).
    Last edited by nsacpi; 04-11-2017 at 10:13 AM.

  21. #19
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,256
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,057
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,693
    Thanked in
    3,881 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tapate50 View Post
    Steven Williams in the 2nd please!
    I just searched BA for this guy, as he is a local prospect that was getting some first round love last year. Not a word about him in the top 100 column and nothing since he was offered by Auburn. Does that mean his stock has fallen that far, or he's expected to enroll regardless of draft spot?

    I can't imagine a big athletic catcher with a nice arm that can hit isn't in the top 100 of a WEAK catcher class falling that far...
    Ivermectin Man

  22. #20
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Although it'll drive some folks crazy, I'm not sure Bukauskas might not be a really good fit. He's going to move FAST, and could conceivably be ready to help the rotation as early as late 2018. Being able to add someone that quickly suddenly frees you up to trade an arm (or two or three) for a serious bat. If you believe in Fried and Allard and Gohara (which I do), taking J. B. if he's there at #5 suddenly makes swapping an arm or two for Moustakas and extending him to solve 3B sure makes A LOT of sense.

    If the Royals don't start playing much better really soon, DMGM would be crazy not to take Newcomb for Moose straight up IMO. That still leaves us the 3 lefties mentioned above, Bukauskas, and Soroka - all of whom should be ready to step in by 2019 at the latest, plus Weigel, Sims, Touki and last year's draftees.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

Similar Threads

  1. Official Offseason Thread
    By Hudson2 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 5778
    Last Post: 02-22-2020, 05:16 PM
  2. The Official Thread of Pachemonium
    By SJ24 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 07-14-2018, 05:40 PM
  3. Official Draft Day, Post-Draft Thread
    By rico43 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 745
    Last Post: 07-17-2017, 09:52 PM
  4. The Official It's Better for Everyone That Dan Uggla's Done Thread
    By rico43 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 07-15-2014, 01:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •