User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: ESPN Layoffs

  1. #1
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Orlando,FL
    Posts
    3,468
    Thanks
    508
    Thanked 1,015 Times in 566 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ESPN Layoffs

    Jayson Stark and Jim Bowden are among the 100 or so reporters laid off by ESPN today.....pretty crazy

    I wonder how long ESPN is going to be around
    Mark Bowman's reports carry a lot of gravity

  2. #2
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    15,670
    Thanks
    994
    Thanked 4,405 Times in 2,830 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are losing a ton of money due to people cutting the cord. Sadly this is going to keep happening.

  3. #3
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,105
    Thanks
    639
    Thanked 555 Times in 397 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why couldn't they fire Steven A Smith..

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hudson2 For This Useful Post:

    Coach_Chris (04-26-2017),jpx7 (04-30-2017)

  5. #4
    Boras' Client striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,418
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 1,654 Times in 965 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They didn't cut fat, they cut deep into the muscle today. Letting go a lot of the niche writers/personalities makes some sense. ESPN has gotten bloated. But getting rid of guys like Stark and Werder is something entirely different.

  6. #5
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    15,670
    Thanks
    994
    Thanked 4,405 Times in 2,830 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    Why couldn't they fire Steven A Smith..
    Because that's what espn is now. What happened to MTV is happening to espn. People don't wait all day to watch sportscenter for highlights when you can see them instantly online.

    They have to adapt.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to thewupk For This Useful Post:

    Hudson2 (04-26-2017)

  8. #6
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,551
    Thanks
    989
    Thanked 4,619 Times in 2,987 Posts
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Guys like Start must have been making a fortune to justify getting let go

  9. #7
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,773
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,127 Posts
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Many, unlike Stephen A., were at the end of their contracts. To be, biggest shock is Dr. Jerry Punch, a 30-year employee. Stark should be with MLB Network by Monday and Bowden is a clown.

  10. #8
    It's OVER 5,000! jsebe10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    5,234
    Thanks
    140
    Thanked 498 Times in 395 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And only one black person...

  11. #9
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Thanks
    932
    Thanked 425 Times in 300 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seldom is there any reason to still watch. A waste of money having to pay for it on tier of satellite bill. Of course, that's no different from hundreds of other channels!

  12. #10
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Orlando,FL
    Posts
    3,468
    Thanks
    508
    Thanked 1,015 Times in 566 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The NFL and MLB network give me everything I need....

    Oh and the golf channel

  13. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    9,749
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 2,502 Times in 1,609 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    Because that's what espn is now. What happened to MTV is happening to espn. People don't wait all day to watch sportscenter for highlights when you can see them instantly online.

    They have to adapt.

    I don't think that is what is killing ESPN. They pander incessantly to the biggest markets and became the network of trolls like Skip Bayliss. It got them ratings in the short term but long term made more people quit watching totally. Yes cord cutting is a factor but it become a lot easier to cut the cord when they became trash. They would run stories like "Saints need to trade Brees to the Jets because they need cap room, third round pick should get it done". That was a real story about 4 years ago. They also started creating stories instead of reporting on stories. A braves example, years ago I remember them interviewing Smoltz and they were fixated on wanting the Braves to trade Smoltz, they kept asking him questions about being traded. Smoltz tells them "look, if they don't want me and try to trade me then sure I will accept, I don't want to be here if they don't want me". What does ESPN do? Runs a story saying Smoltz wants out of Atlanta. Another example of the **** ESPN does is when something happens like Michael Sam coming out as gay. ESPN goes on and on about how it's going to be a distraction. Well yeah it's a distraction when ESPN reporters ask every player on the team "is Michael Sam being gay a distraction?". Then when a player says no they ask the same same question. Well yeah it's a ducking distraction when ESPN asks every player 15 questions a day about Michael Sam. I know some teams didn't want him because it would be a distraction but I guarantee you the only distraction they were worried about was that ESPN was going to do finally harp on it in every interview until it became a distraction. So yeah, **** that network.



    Edit - and let's not forget Jim Bowden of the "I would trade Strasburg for one year of a 45 year old Roy Oswalt" fame.



    Edit 2 - for anyone that still watches how is ESPN handling Tebow playing baseball? Do they have a go pro hanging from his nuts that they go live to every time he bats?
    Last edited by cajunrevenge; 04-26-2017 at 08:56 PM.
    "State power feeds on crisis and enemies"

    John T. Flynn 1944

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to cajunrevenge For This Useful Post:

    mossy (04-27-2017)

  15. #12
    Mashin' to Mississippi chipchildress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    536
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 127 Times in 93 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    people still watch sports on espn.

    espn just overspent and are losing subscriptions by the bundle. it has nothing to do with some bad story about drew brees or whatever other nonsense i'm reading above.

  16. #13
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,523
    Thanks
    999
    Thanked 5,640 Times in 2,801 Posts
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsebe10 View Post
    And only one black person...

  17. #14
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    15,670
    Thanks
    994
    Thanked 4,405 Times in 2,830 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    I don't think that is what is killing ESPN. They pander incessantly to the biggest markets and became the network of trolls like Skip Bayliss. It got them ratings in the short term but long term made more people quit watching totally. Yes cord cutting is a factor but it become a lot easier to cut the cord when they became trash. They would run stories like "Saints need to trade Brees to the Jets because they need cap room, third round pick should get it done". That was a real story about 4 years ago. They also started creating stories instead of reporting on stories. A braves example, years ago I remember them interviewing Smoltz and they were fixated on wanting the Braves to trade Smoltz, they kept asking him questions about being traded. Smoltz tells them "look, if they don't want me and try to trade me then sure I will accept, I don't want to be here if they don't want me". What does ESPN do? Runs a story saying Smoltz wants out of Atlanta. Another example of the **** ESPN does is when something happens like Michael Sam coming out as gay. ESPN goes on and on about how it's going to be a distraction. Well yeah it's a distraction when ESPN reporters ask every player on the team "is Michael Sam being gay a distraction?". Then when a player says no they ask the same same question. Well yeah it's a ducking distraction when ESPN asks every player 15 questions a day about Michael Sam. I know some teams didn't want him because it would be a distraction but I guarantee you the only distraction they were worried about was that ESPN was going to do finally harp on it in every interview until it became a distraction. So yeah, **** that network.



    Edit - and let's not forget Jim Bowden of the "I would trade Strasburg for one year of a 45 year old Roy Oswalt" fame.



    Edit 2 - for anyone that still watches how is ESPN handling Tebow playing baseball? Do they have a go pro hanging from his nuts that they go live to every time he bats?
    I won't disagree with that I am turned off by that as well. But I still think I am in the minority. I feel most people eat that drama up whether its real or artificial. It does get ratings which is why they do it. Same reason clickbait articles are way more popular online then actual reports of actual news. It's just the society that we are in. For example in years past I would be glued to ESPN's Baseball Tonight during their trade deadline show. IMO it was the best source of quick information at the time. Fast forward to today? You get **** on twitter instantly. Wanted Braves highlights? Wait for Sportscenter or Baseball Tonight. Now? Watch highlights minutes after they happen.

    People still watch the live sports as chilldress said. That's always going to happen and IMO is the #1 thing against anyone cutting the cord altogether. However ESPN did pay a ****load for the rights they got and with them not getting built in revenue anymore due to cord cutters they are hurting.

  18. #15
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Thanks
    932
    Thanked 425 Times in 300 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    I don't think that is what is killing ESPN. They pander incessantly to the biggest markets and became the network of trolls like Skip Bayliss. It got them ratings in the short term but long term made more people quit watching totally. Yes cord cutting is a factor but it become a lot easier to cut the cord when they became trash. They would run stories like "Saints need to trade Brees to the Jets because they need cap room, third round pick should get it done". That was a real story about 4 years ago. They also started creating stories instead of reporting on stories. A braves example, years ago I remember them interviewing Smoltz and they were fixated on wanting the Braves to trade Smoltz, they kept asking him questions about being traded. Smoltz tells them "look, if they don't want me and try to trade me then sure I will accept, I don't want to be here if they don't want me". What does ESPN do? Runs a story saying Smoltz wants out of Atlanta. Another example of the **** ESPN does is when something happens like Michael Sam coming out as gay. ESPN goes on and on about how it's going to be a distraction. Well yeah it's a distraction when ESPN reporters ask every player on the team "is Michael Sam being gay a distraction?". Then when a player says no they ask the same same question. Well yeah it's a ducking distraction when ESPN asks every player 15 questions a day about Michael Sam. I know some teams didn't want him because it would be a distraction but I guarantee you the only distraction they were worried about was that ESPN was going to do finally harp on it in every interview until it became a distraction. So yeah, **** that network.



    Edit - and let's not forget Jim Bowden of the "I would trade Strasburg for one year of a 45 year old Roy Oswalt" fame.



    Edit 2 - for anyone that still watches how is ESPN handling Tebow playing baseball? Do they have a go pro hanging from his nuts that they go live to every time he bats?
    Those are good stories, but not the deal breakers. Back in the the 90's, SportsCenter was definitely must-see TV. All of the important personalities dispersed. Then, as OP noted, the specialty networks. For everybody here, MLB and for me, NHL instead of NFL. NBC Sports became more aggressive at getting packages that ESPN used to handle (hockey, Formula One).

    Unless cable and satellite providers drop ESPN, people who no longer have use for other, are still stuck paying.

  19. #16
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,313
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked 1,527 Times in 1,006 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    I don't think that is what is killing ESPN. They pander incessantly to the biggest markets and became the network of trolls like Skip Bayliss. It got them ratings in the short term but long term made more people quit watching totally. Yes cord cutting is a factor but it become a lot easier to cut the cord when they became trash. They would run stories like "Saints need to trade Brees to the Jets because they need cap room, third round pick should get it done". That was a real story about 4 years ago. They also started creating stories instead of reporting on stories. A braves example, years ago I remember them interviewing Smoltz and they were fixated on wanting the Braves to trade Smoltz, they kept asking him questions about being traded. Smoltz tells them "look, if they don't want me and try to trade me then sure I will accept, I don't want to be here if they don't want me". What does ESPN do? Runs a story saying Smoltz wants out of Atlanta. Another example of the **** ESPN does is when something happens like Michael Sam coming out as gay. ESPN goes on and on about how it's going to be a distraction. Well yeah it's a distraction when ESPN reporters ask every player on the team "is Michael Sam being gay a distraction?". Then when a player says no they ask the same same question. Well yeah it's a ducking distraction when ESPN asks every player 15 questions a day about Michael Sam. I know some teams didn't want him because it would be a distraction but I guarantee you the only distraction they were worried about was that ESPN was going to do finally harp on it in every interview until it became a distraction. So yeah, **** that network.



    Edit - and let's not forget Jim Bowden of the "I would trade Strasburg for one year of a 45 year old Roy Oswalt" fame.



    Edit 2 - for anyone that still watches how is ESPN handling Tebow playing baseball? Do they have a go pro hanging from his nuts that they go live to every time he bats?
    People who were watching ESPN and sports in general are not the ones cutting the cord. If you want to watch live sports, you have cable. Period.

    It is absolutely the non-sports viewers cutting the cord that is leading to the loss of subscribers. I don't watch ESPN much and haven't for several years, but I absolutely still subscribe because I want live sports.

  20. #17
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    5,402
    Thanks
    220
    Thanked 876 Times in 672 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chipchildress View Post
    people still watch sports on espn.

    espn just overspent and are losing subscriptions by the bundle. it has nothing to do with some bad story about drew brees or whatever other nonsense i'm reading above.
    They also aren't even losing money yet.

    They are making an adjustment in advance of what is coming.

    They only need to start monetizing a la carte offerings or offering direct subscriptions and they will be fine.

  21. #18
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory BlackwaterPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 125 Times in 78 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Heres a nice list of who is gone so far

    https://www.reddit.com/r/sports/comm...alities_today/

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to BlackwaterPark For This Useful Post:

    Coach_Chris (04-27-2017)

  23. #19
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    12,450
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 1,475 Times in 1,044 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ESPN has become a pop culture left wing loving disaster. Glad they are beginning to crumble.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NinersSBChamps For This Useful Post:

    Braves1976 (04-28-2017),Jaw (04-27-2017)

  25. #20
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    12,230
    Thanks
    3,339
    Thanked 1,412 Times in 1,020 Posts
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I didn't realize Andy Katz lost his position too. They let go of the few actual reporters they have.
    "Can a man still be brave if he is afraid? That is the only time a man can be brave." - G.R.R.M (Game of Thrones)

    "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." - F. Scott Fitzgerald (G. Gatsby)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •