Page 84 of 141 FirstFirst ... 3474828384858694134 ... LastLast
Results 1,661 to 1,680 of 2801

Thread: Official 2017 Trade Deadilne Thread

  1. #1661
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Sources: While #Astros are in talks with #Athletics on Sonny Gray, they remain interested in Justin Verlander/Justin Wilson deal w/ Detroit.
    I'd sure love to take the $10MM the Braves squandered on Colon (and, to a lesser extent, the $7.5MM misspent on Dickey) and offer it up as salary relief in a prospect light deal with Detroit for Verlander.

  2. #1662
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,253
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,021
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,173
    Thanked in
    5,823 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk View Post
    I'd sure love to take the $10MM the Braves squandered on Colon (and, to a lesser extent, the $7.5MM misspent on Dickey) and offer it up as salary relief in a prospect light deal with Detroit for Verlander.
    That Kemp deal kills me.

    That's a lot of money on our book for 3 years

  3. #1663
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Assuming Gray produces 1 win for the rest of the year at a cost of $1M and change, times the 2x contender's premium, he likely has almost $20M in surplus value this year. He is controlled via arb for 2 more seasons that will cost about $15M. If he produces 6 WAR over those 2 seasons, that's another $45M in surplus value.

    The Astros have the following valuable prospects according to BA's midseason list (with estimated surplus value):

    8. Bregman ($71.6M)
    29. Martes ($33.9M)
    32. Musgrove ($32.6M)
    35. Tucker ($41.8M)
    47 Paulino ($25.0M)
    94 Fisher ($20.2M)

    We can piece those values together to get $65M. We know Bregman is untouchable, and Tucker is likely off limits (they would have Q or Sale if they were willing to trade him). Musgrove and Martes are already in the MLB rotation, so maybe they are off limits too?. A package of Paulino plus Fisher is likely not enough to get Gray. Maybe Musgrove/Martes plus Fisher plus 2 other notable parts? Maybe include Whitley as a way to not include Musgrove/Martes?

    I'm guessing one of Martes/Musgrove plus Fisher plus 2 other parts for Gray.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 07-20-2017 at 11:35 AM.

  4. #1664
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,553
    Thanked in
    1,496 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Assuming Gray produces 1 win for the rest of the year at a cost of $1M and change, times the 2x contender's premium, he likely has almost $20M in surplus value this year. He is controlled via arb for 2 more seasons that will cost about $15M. If he produces 6 WAR over those 2 seasons, that's another $45M in surplus value.

    The Astros have the following valuable prospects according to BA's midseason list (with estimated surplus value):

    8. Bregman ($71.6M)
    29. Martes ($33.9M)
    32. Musgrove ($32.6M)
    35. Tucker ($41.8M)
    47 Paulino ($25.0M)
    94 Fisher ($20.2M)

    We can piece those values together to get $65M. We know Bregman is untouchable, and Tucker is likely off limits (they would have Q or Sale if they were willing to trade him). Musgrove and Martes are already in the MLB rotation, so maybe they are off limits too?. A package of Paulino plus Fisher is likely not enough to get Gray. Maybe Musgrove/Martes plus Fisher plus 2 other notable parts? Maybe include Whitley as a way to not include Musgrove/Martes?

    I'm guessing one of Martes/Musgrove plus Fisher plus 2 other parts for Gray.
    I'm not a huge fan of doing it, but what do you think a package of Braves prospects for Gray look like?

  5. #1665
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    I'm not a huge fan of doing it, but what do you think a package of Braves prospects for Gray look like?
    10. Acuna ($69.7M)
    23. Allard ($36.7M)
    25. Albies ($53.7M)
    33. Soroka ($32.1M)
    41. Wright ($28.2M)
    42 Newk ($27.7M)
    55. Anderson ($20.8M)
    72. Maitan ($21.9M)
    76. Gohara ($16.1M)

    Plus position players just outside to Top 100 like Pache and Waters that are probably worth ~$20M each (though I may be letting my homerism overvalue Waters).

    Assuming Wright, Acuna and Maitan are off limits (Albies appears to be available for some reason), the package to get Gray NOW would either be Albies plus 2-3 filler guys, or heavy on pitching...something like Allard/Soroka plus Gohara plus 2 other parts.

    If the Braves try to get Gray in the offseason, his value drops significantly from $65M to $45M. Making a deal at that time makes a lot more sense for the Braves.

    I wouldn't be opposed to consolidating 2-3 pitching prospects into a solid TOR SP this offseason. The ones I wouldn't want to trade would be Wright and Soroka...the rest can be traded for their surplus value. Just don't trade any position players.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 07-20-2017 at 12:20 PM.

  6. #1666
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Assuming Gray produces 1 win for the rest of the year at a cost of $1M and change, times the 2x contender's premium, he likely has almost $20M in surplus value this year. He is controlled via arb for 2 more seasons that will cost about $15M. If he produces 6 WAR over those 2 seasons, that's another $45M in surplus value.

    The Astros have the following valuable prospects according to BA's midseason list (with estimated surplus value):

    8. Bregman ($71.6M)
    29. Martes ($33.9M)
    32. Musgrove ($32.6M)
    35. Tucker ($41.8M)
    47 Paulino ($25.0M)
    94 Fisher ($20.2M)

    We can piece those values together to get $65M. We know Bregman is untouchable, and Tucker is likely off limits (they would have Q or Sale if they were willing to trade him). Musgrove and Martes are already in the MLB rotation, so maybe they are off limits too?. A package of Paulino plus Fisher is likely not enough to get Gray. Maybe Musgrove/Martes plus Fisher plus 2 other notable parts? Maybe include Whitley as a way to not include Musgrove/Martes?

    I'm guessing one of Martes/Musgrove plus Fisher plus 2 other parts for Gray.
    I agree that Tucker is likely untouchable, but do we know he is simply because they don't have Quintana or Sale? Moncada and Jimenez are both better prospects.

  7. #1667
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    I agree that Tucker is likely untouchable, but do we know he is simply because they don't have Quintana or Sale? Moncada and Jimenez are both better prospects.
    Everything we heard during all the trade talks was that a Tucker and Martes package wasn't happening, ever.

    I think folks took that to mean Tucker was untouchable.

  8. #1668
    Gwinnett Bound
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    663
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    39
    Thanked in
    32 Posts
    Not sure I'd buy now. Is rather wait till the off-season and see if we can pry Archer away from TB. Just my opinion but Archer is better then Gray. thoughts?

  9. #1669
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jcc03004 View Post
    Not sure I'd buy now. Is rather wait till the off-season and see if we can pry Archer away from TB. Just my opinion but Archer is better then Gray. thoughts?
    Agreed 100%. And I'd raise you one step further...

    I would wait until the 2018 trade deadline, make sure the Braves are contenders, and THEN trade for a guy like Archer. Or a rental of Machado/Donaldson at 3B.

    Make sure the Braves are actually in contention before making serious acquisitions.

  10. #1670
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Everything we heard during all the trade talks was that a Tucker and Martes package wasn't happening, ever.

    I think folks took that to mean Tucker was untouchable.
    Yeah, I think that's probably right. Was just mentioning that the packages they ultimately got included better prospects than Tucker and are arguably as good as a Tucker/Martes package.

  11. #1671
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Agreed 100%. And I'd raise you one step further...

    I would wait until the 2018 trade deadline, make sure the Braves are contenders, and THEN trade for a guy like Archer. Or a rental of Machado/Donaldson at 3B.

    Make sure the Braves are actually in contention before making serious acquisitions.
    You do have to weigh, though, that at the deadline you're paying more. Will you ultimately pay more at the 2018 deadline than you would have in the offseason? Tough to say, but it's a risk.

  12. #1672
    Gwinnett Bound
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    663
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    39
    Thanked in
    32 Posts
    Not sure about the deadline would rather have Archer for the whole year.
    Archer
    Teheran
    Folty
    Dickey
    Newcomb/Sims
    I think RA at 8 mil is a safer bet then buying a #4 starter see Bartolo. Question is can we get Archer without including Folty.


    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Agreed 100%. And I'd raise you one step further...

    I would wait until the 2018 trade deadline, make sure the Braves are contenders, and THEN trade for a guy like Archer. Or a rental of Machado/Donaldson at 3B.

    Make sure the Braves are actually in contention before making serious acquisitions.

  13. #1673
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    You do have to weigh, though, that at the deadline you're paying more. Will you ultimately pay more at the 2018 deadline than you would have in the offseason? Tough to say, but it's a risk.
    The Braves would be paying a 2x premium for the last 2 months of 2018 and the playoffs, but they KNOW they are contenders at that point. They are also more sure whichever pitcher they acquire will be healthy for those 2 months.

    That's the whole reason the contender's premium exists.

    Pitchers are the most "win now" assets in the game because they are so likely to get hurt. So when you acquire one, you better be able to won NOW with him. The bulk of their value is realized very early in the term of team control.

  14. #1674
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,560
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,048
    Thanked in
    6,145 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jcc03004 View Post
    Not sure about the deadline would rather have Archer for the whole year.
    Archer
    Teheran
    Folty
    Dickey
    Newcomb/Sims
    I think RA at 8 mil is a safer bet then buying a #4 starter see Bartolo. Question is can we get Archer without including Folty.
    Yeah, that's also a whole year the Braves are on the hook if he gets hurt. And a whole year the Braves can under perform and not even be contenders.

    There's a reason the contender's premium exists...

  15. #1675
    On BBA's Top 100 Prospects List PurpleBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    725
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    45
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    192
    Thanked in
    110 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Compared to Jaime Garcia, its pretty strong. You were claiming Garcias value was high because they aren't any better options....there are plenty of better options.
    "High" is relative. We aren't getting a Quintana return for him. However, if we sell Garcia, better do it in the next 2 weeks or the return will be less than if we attempted to sell at another time. If we wait, we'll get a bag of balls instead of a $500 pitching machine.

    Out of those pitchers you listed, skills wise I'm not sure who I'd take over Garcia. Estrada and Liriano have been wrecks. If Cahill would stay healthy, I'd take him over Garcia. Most of the pitchers on that list are junkerballers.

  16. #1676
    On BBA's Top 100 Prospects List PurpleBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    725
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    45
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    192
    Thanked in
    110 Posts
    Astros farm system is deep. Guys not on the BA top 100 list like Teoscar Hernandez, Ramon Laureano, Yordan Alvarez, Daz Cameron, Garret Stubbs, Jason Martin. Alvarez and Laureano will probably be on the pre-season to be honest.

  17. #1677
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The Braves would be paying a 2x premium for the last 2 months of 2018 and the playoffs, but they KNOW they are contenders at that point. They are also more sure whichever pitcher they acquire will be healthy for those 2 months.

    That's the whole reason the contender's premium exists.

    Pitchers are the most "win now" assets in the game because they are so likely to get hurt. So when you acquire one, you better be able to won NOW with him. The bulk of their value is realized very early in the term of team control.
    Sure, I get that. But if you feel pretty confident about being a contender and can get him for cheaper in the offseason than you will 4 months later, it might prove worth it. Again, it's a risk, but one that could pay off.

    I generally hate buying at the deadline. I think it usually works out worse for the team buying.

  18. #1678
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,253
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,021
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,173
    Thanked in
    5,823 Posts
    The only reason to buy at the deadline for a non-contending team is because that player is who you want and if you don't act, he goes to another team.

    For example, if Coppy had a boner for Quintana, he would have had to get him NOW or else he loses his chance to get him for 3 years

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to sturg33 For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (07-20-2017)

  20. #1679
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,052
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,905
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,719
    Thanked in
    4,976 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PurpleBrave View Post
    "High" is relative. We aren't getting a Quintana return for him. However, if we sell Garcia, better do it in the next 2 weeks or the return will be less than if we attempted to sell at another time. If we wait, we'll get a bag of balls instead of a $500 pitching machine.

    Out of those pitchers you listed, skills wise I'm not sure who I'd take over Garcia. Estrada and Liriano have been wrecks. If Cahill would stay healthy, I'd take him over Garcia. Most of the pitchers on that list are junkerballers.
    There's no Quintana return for anyone on that list, so it's all about who thinks they need a 5th starter to go the rest of the way during the regular season. It will be strictly cost/benefit on the part of the seller. My guess is those who are interested in obtaining a starter have contacted the teams of the guys who are listed. This is where you have to trust your scouting staff to know that you aren't asking too much when you try to peddle one of these guys. Garcia could net one decent guy or two "meh" guys. Seeing we gave up three "mehs," I can only hope we don't lose on the "meh" scale.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-20-2017)

  22. #1680
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,052
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,905
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,719
    Thanked in
    4,976 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    The only reason to buy at the deadline for a non-contending team is because that player is who you want and if you don't act, he goes to another team.

    For example, if Coppy had a boner for Quintana, he would have had to get him NOW or else he loses his chance to get him for 3 years
    I think the Yanks wanted Frazier, but they also knew that the Red Sox wanted him. He's an upgrade for them and it keeps him off third base for the Red Sox. But this is case in point of what you're saying.

Similar Threads

  1. Official Prediction Thread: 2017 MLB Season (Braves Only)
    By thethe in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 07-10-2017, 12:06 PM
  2. Official pre-Draft thread
    By Hudson2 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 1270
    Last Post: 06-13-2017, 03:01 PM
  3. Official off-season trade rumor and suggestion thread
    By Enscheff in forum The Fredi Archives
    Replies: 721
    Last Post: 02-28-2015, 08:57 PM
  4. Official off-season trade rumor and suggestion thread
    By Enscheff in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 721
    Last Post: 02-28-2015, 08:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •