More evidence than Ford had
More evidence than Ford had
The Sanders Liberals are going to be an interesting group this year. Say what you will about their politics, this group is very principled in my opinion. They hate the Democratic establishment and will take the Biden accusations seriously.
It’s going to be interesting how many of them stay home or vote third party. It might be the most important deciding factor in the election.
Lol.
"Where is the NYTIMES?????"
"I would be shocked if they aren't investigating this"
*NYTimes published in-depth piece covering the whole issue from multiple angles, making it clear they've been investigating for weeks*
"SEEE THEY ARE SO BIASED"
You guys are hilarious and predictable.
And their process and output today makes you feel good about their integrity?Originally Posted by Metaphysicist
Yes. Did you actually read the article, or just post twitter ****posts about it?
Did you see how they presented the story and then changed their article or did you just read the current version which went through their DNC editing process?
Uhh... they found more evidence against Biden than they had on BK... only to conclude there was no pattern... well, other than the consistent touching that made women uncomfortable... before deleting that little nugget
Meta showed the depths of his morality.
Yeah, so you guys read the ****posts not the article. My take away was not "open and shut boys, Biden did nothing wrong."
I actually expect the story to get legs now just because the DNC needs to exit quickly from Biden.
But their edits to the story are disgraceful and you ignoring that speaks to your bias.
I dont know how you can defend the edits to the story.
Just hilarious that you guys aren't even claiming to have read the actual story but have been bitching and moaning about it.
I get why they dropped the "excepts for the kissing thing." It was really begging the question in a way I'm sure they didn't intend.
I get why they did it too.
This was my reaction as well.
The removal (inclusion?) of that single sentence was messy, but i thought the article and investigation itself was thorough and fair.
I wish the BK coverage was treated similarly, but, hey, Biden’s came in the middle of the biggest news story since 9/11 and the other didn’t. I’m not going to get myself worked up about it.
Because the info was already in the article elsewhere, and they didn't want to make a judgment on the open question of "is that sexual misconduct" in their straightforward investigative piece?
Wow, you've become so reasonable.
The other issue is that there currently is time to do a 2 week investigation. The BK stuff was against a ticking clock. Not saying it was handled perfectly, but that was a factor.
You are missing the point.
It is the DIFFERENCE with which our media has approached the allegations to Biden that they did with Kavanaugh.
If you think they have given the same level of scrutiny and attention, then we're so far apart that it's not worth discussing anymore.
Just did a quick search on Tara Reade on Cnn.com
It returned 0 results.
Blasey Ford returned 678 results. Julie Swtnick, the psycho who accused him of being in a gang rape ring, has 61 results on CNN.
I cant put my finger on the difference in circumstances right here. Could you maybe help me out?
maybe because ---
https://medium.com/@eddiekrassenstei...n-e4cb3ee38460
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Sigh. That's what you come back with?
1. Believe all women
2. Less evidence than Julie Swetnick?
3. Not a single story... it's as if the accusation has never happened on CNN
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote