It may be factually accurate (not speaking to conclusions) while also omitting more pertinent facts than it contains.Originally Posted by thethe
It may be factually accurate (not speaking to conclusions) while also omitting more pertinent facts than it contains.
Hah - Making the argument that they didn't do everything possible to exonerate HRC. What a laugh.
Natural Immunity Croc
And thats why we will have a memo written by house democrats. Can't wait to read it.
Natural Immunity Croc
Some talk it may never make it to the public. I doubt that but wouldn't be surprised either.
It's doubtful that there's going to be a full release of the information, if it's judged to compromise sources and methods...which is one reason this is such a grubby little trick.
From what I read the house GOP wanted the dems to remove factual inaccuracies from their memo. Afterwards it will be voted on to be released.
Natural Immunity Croc
Lol
goldfly (01-31-2018)
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Brian Krassenstein
��
@krassenstein
16h16 hours ago
BREAKING:
Russian News Outlet TASS reports that the Russian Spy Chief, Sergey Naryshkin, who is under US sanctions, entered the US w/ Trump's approval.
No US officials have mentioned this visit & it appears that TASS released this info to retaliate against Trump's sanctions list
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
A different view of this would be that DoJ is begging for the opportunity to decide whether to release a memo that may reflect very poorly on DoJ.
Enough of the nasty underbelly of DC has been exposed that I don't think either view being accurate would surprise me.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
This is a good peek at the process and the high bar the Nunes memo would have to clear in order to back up its purported implications:
One is more likely than the other. In judging the integrity of the parties involved, it strikes me that there is a significant difference between Trump and the Trumpophiles on the one hand and the folks at DoJ and FBI on the other. I'm not saying the latter are perfect. But there is no moral equivalence in my book.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
That same group that went realnhard on Hillary right?
I suppose I'm in the camp that believes the memo may well be both accurate and damaging to DoJ, that there may be very good reasons it shouldn't be released, and that Trump may be willing to put his political gain above the greater good. I'm not sure why anyone places any trust in the DoJ or FBI at this point.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
For which I'm sure Hillary sent them a thank you card.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
FBI director Christopher Wray has reportedly warned the White House against releasing the classified GOP House Intelligence Committee memo, saying that some of the information in the document is inaccurate.
Says it "paints a false narrative."
A false narrative and inaccurate are two different things.
which one is worse
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Someone claiming something to be a false narrative is injecting subjectivity into the equation. Why is that narrative misleading?
There is no such grey area with facts.
Of course you express no concern.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote