"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Sure. It might have no ongoing ramifications at all. And, frankly, unless Papadopoulos had knowledge of interactions that weren't memorialized electronically, he might not have anything to offer.
Still, that door is open now.
Just out of curiousity, you think this is still NBD?
I think that's part of the central question that has to be answered. There's just way too much going on to lend any credence to the "get over it" crowd. It's enough to warrant a thorough, credible understanding of what happened, even if it is entirely devoid of criminal wrongdoing. Mueller's appointment was originally hailed as a step towards that. What's changed?
Two things:
1)Trump was an idiot to hire Manafort.
2)Manafort was a bigger idiot to take the job. He had to know his financial shenanigans were going to come under scrutiny.
Last edited by Runnin; 10-30-2017 at 11:45 AM.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
Jaw (10-30-2017)
Ok. You might be correct. But, when you were saying "still sending bloodhounds to the banks and coming back dry" about Manafort, you seemed pretty confident, too.
I suspect that if Mueller's office weren't under the impression that there was more to come, that they wouldn't have unsealed the Papadopoulos indictment today. I could certainly be wrong about that.
Manafort needed it. This is why it's silly to discount any reasonable conjecture about what he may have done. Maybe he didn't do anything sketchy after his elevation. Maybe he was canned before he could have. But since we know he directly signaled his intent to trade on his position, it follows that he is under suspicion...and he should be, right?
dat footnote tho...
"Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly
“I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg
I believe Manafort will ultimately walk away with a (relative) slap on the wrist. Whether that comes as a result of a true deal, good lawyering, money, or the merits of the case itself ... well, I have my thoughts, but I'll reserve them for the time being.
I see where there could potentially be more to come here, absolutely. Everything that we've seen happen so far, in relation to how you would prosecute a case, is fairly conventional. At the same time, I feel like the leak about these indictments on Friday was pure pushback. Pushback that could have reached fever pitch if it had dominated the weekend cycle. So, in that sense, my reading of things going forward is a bit muted. I think these indictments gives Mueller some breathing room - the question is how much.
You have discounted the idea of collusion between Russia and the "Trump campaign proper." On the occasion of the announcement of a guilty plea from a member the Trump campaign proper re: lying about contacts with Russia, you're fortifying that position. I'm genuinely curious as to why are you more convinced today.
Well, I guess in order for me to answer that question, I would need for you to demonstrate how you think Papadopoulos' contacts with Russia were collusive in nature. I'd also quibble with whether or not Papadopoulos fits into my "Trump campaign proper" categorization, but that's neither here nor there I suppose.
What do you all make of podesta stepping down?
With respect to collusion, it seems to me a distinction can be made with respect to:
1) The Trump campaign actively seeking help from the Russians
2) The Trump campaign welcoming help from the Russians
3) The Trump campaign being indifferent about whether the source of information reaching it was connected to the Russians or not
Based on what I've seen so far, I would say 3 is very likely, 2 is more likely than not, and 1 remains unproven.
There is a law on the books prohibiting campaigns from receiving anything of value from foreign nationals and entities. I'm not sure the distinctions I made above matter with respect to the interpretation of this law. It could well be that the Mueller investigation will require the courts to rule on the interpretation of this law. The law could well equally apply to the Steele dossier, since he is a foreign national.
However, there remains a non-legal distinction to be made between accepting something from someone like Steele and accepting something from an entity under Putin's control. Imo this distinction is more important than some of the legal niceties involved.
Last edited by nsacpi; 10-30-2017 at 12:32 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
So Papadopoulos made a direct effort at collusion. Next is proving trump knew about it (which, come on...)
"Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly
“I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg
Jake TapperVerified account @jaketapper 5h5 hours ago
More
Also a good time for public to see which media outlets have been reporting the actual story vs which are obedient vassals of people in power
"Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly
“I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg