Manafartov should be called to testify publicly about his activities.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Runnin (04-16-2021)
What did he give to Kilimnik and how many times did he meet with him, etc.
Was he aware that he was being used for Russian disinformation against the U.S.? Did he do it for money? How much?
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
Last edited by nsacpi; 04-17-2021 at 07:46 AM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
" what propaganda ? "
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/20...k_510974.html#!
For those that don’t realize that we all knew the whole theory was bull**** in early 2017.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/20...k_510974.html#!
Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:
"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."
"There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. … We didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made."
"Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."
Just want to make sure that we understand who is believing propaganda here.
But sure, without any evidence at all keep believing the hack was done by the Russians. I’m sure it’s as reliable as the Russian bounty story.
To wrap up a media angle to this. You’ll find difficulty finding those articles on google but with the same search words in DuckDuckGo you get the articles immediately.
Things that make you go hmmmmmm
Why did Mifsud's lawyer Stephan Roh scrub his website of all information about the extensive work he did for Russia and Russian clients. Why did Roh write a book packed with deza about Mifsud being an agent for western intelligence services?
Why is Roh involved in money laundering schemes with shady Russian oligarchs?
Last edited by nsacpi; 04-17-2021 at 08:24 AM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
I can't speak to anything that Roh did. He would have to explain why he did or did anything.
There is as much 'evidence' of Mifsud working with western intelligence as there him working against it. Seems like you are still falling for the same things over and over.
Why not have Mifsud testify? Did Mueller try to make that happen? If he is so central to the theory (which he is) then why has he been ignored?
Natural Immunity Croc
Lets see how many people fell down the rock solid rabbit whole of russian bounties
Natural Immunity Croc