Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

[nsacpi]

Can he fire Mueller without cause?

[thethe]

Can he fire Mueller without cause?

He can but it would be a terrible move if he did.

[nsacpi]

The President seems so convinced of his impending exoneration that he is telling associates Mueller will soon write a letter clearing him that Trump can brandish to Washington and the world in a bid to finally emerge from the cloud of suspicion that has loomed over the first chapter of his presidency, the sources said.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/18/politi...ion/index.html

Good to see that the president perceives it to be in his best interest to allow the investigation to run its course.

[57Brave]

The Rude Pundit‏ @rudepundit
11m11 minutes ago

Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but no one ever seriously asked if he would fire Kenneth Starr during the Whitewater investigation.

[thethe]

The Rude Pundit‏ @rudepundit
11m11 minutes ago

Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but no one ever seriously asked if he would fire Kenneth Starr during the Whitewater investigation.

Did Kenneth star's investigators talk about an insurance policy if the Clinton was still president?

[57Brave]

boy, i'll tell ya what,

I just have no answer to that

[Julio3000]

Did Kenneth star's investigators talk about an insurance policy if the Clinton was still president?

If you take the time to learn about the Starr investigation, you'd know that this is a fruitless inquiry. The Starr investigation went down a lot of rabbit holes, and it was an obviously partisan attempt to damage Clinton's presidency, and it uncovered what was determined to be actual wrongdoing, and it was ultimately limited to findings of real-world fact. All of these things can be true simultaneously.

As for the "insurance policy," I have two comments. First, you can't make that text mean what you want it to mean simply by repeating your interpretation of it. Second, we don't have the benefit of a curated glance at the private communications of people involved in that investigation. If we did, it might be illuminating.

[thethe]

If you take the time to learn about the Starr investigation, you'd know that this is a fruitless inquiry. The Starr investigation went down a lot of rabbit holes, and it was an obviously partisan attempt to damage Clinton's presidency, and it uncovered what was determined to be actual wrongdoing, and it was ultimately limited to findings of real-world fact. All of these things can be true simultaneously.

As for the "insurance policy," I have two comments. First, you can't make that text mean what you want it to mean simply by repeating your interpretation of it. Second, we don't have the benefit of a curated glance at the private communications of people involved in that investigation. If we did, it might be illuminating.

I think an impartial person would see that to be a nefarious reference but I'm not a neutral person in this fight. I just don't see what that could have meant which would be considered wholesome.

[thethe]

[nsacpi]

if it is a farce it will be revealed such

[57Brave]

[thethe]

Do you think this was isolated to trumps campaign? Contacts with other countries qre common and this 'issue' would occur with many other campaigns with many different countries.

So, do you have any real news?

[57Brave]

no, it really doesn't.

there are reports of the Reagan campaign colluding with the Iranians to hold off release of hostages and of Nixon colluding with N Viet Nam to stall Paris peace talks -- but nothing historical to back up that nonsense you take to heart.

[thethe]

no, it really doesn't.

there are reports of the Reagan campaign colluding with the Iranians to hold off release of hostages and of Nixon colluding with N Viet Nam to stall Paris peace talks -- but nothing historical to back up that nonsense you take to heart.

So do you want to talk about HRC campaign then? What would you classify Podesta?

[57Brave]

Let's see how history classifies HRC/Podesta .

And Trump/Russia for that matter.

[57Brave]

https://www.buzzfeed.com/emmaloop/th...nKe#.vadN5pQnE



Denizcan James‏ @MrFilmkritik
4h4 hours ago

Michigan:
Hillary: 2,268,839
Trump: 2,279,543
Stein: 51,463

Wisconsin:
Hillary: 1,382,536
Trump: 1,405,284
Stein: 31,072

Pennsylvania
Hillary: 2,926,441
Trump: 2,970,733
Stein: 49,941

I'm no mathematician, but it looks like Jill Stein is indirectly responsible for Trump.

[thethe]

https://www.buzzfeed.com/emmaloop/th...nKe#.vadN5pQnE



Denizcan James‏ @MrFilmkritik
4h4 hours ago

Michigan:
Hillary: 2,268,839
Trump: 2,279,543
Stein: 51,463

Wisconsin:
Hillary: 1,382,536
Trump: 1,405,284
Stein: 31,072

Pennsylvania
Hillary: 2,926,441
Trump: 2,970,733
Stein: 49,941

I'm no mathematician, but it looks like Jill Stein is indirectly responsible for Trump.

Everybody's colluding!!!!

[thethe]

So now it's all but confirmed insurance policy meant the Dossier/Russia probe. This looks real kosher to me.....

[The Chosen One]

United Deep States of America.

[thethe]

United Deep States of America.

Head in the sand bro....