Things They Say

[57Brave]

"The notion of the federal stockpile was it's supposed to be our stockpile. It's not supposed to be states stockpiles that they then use."
-Jared Kushner

wasnt there a Pink Floyd song ....

[cajunrevenge]

“We cannot let this, we’ve never allowed any crisis from the Civil War straight through to the pandemic of 17, all the way around, 16, we have never, never let our democracy sakes second fiddle, way they, we can both have a democracy and ... correct the public health.”



The best the Democrats have to offer......

[57Brave]

Remember when DonaldTrump
said there’d be ZERO cases in America.
Now we’re digging mass graves.
We triple the number of cases of second
closest country.
Epic incompetence. Cost lives!
-Cenk Uyger

[57Brave]

Legend has it one time someone quoted John 3:16 to Rickey Henderson and he said
“I don’t wanna hear about John hittin’ .316, Rickey’s hittin’ .330.”


kinda like Yogi stories

[57Brave]

Hannity: "Doctor Oz, help us."

Dr. Oz: "Well, at first, we need our mojo back. Let's start with things that are really critical to the nation where we think we might be able to go for it without getting into a lot of trouble. I tell ya, schools are a very appetizing opportunity. I just saw a nice piece in The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality. And, you know, any life is a life lost, but to get every child back into a school where they're safely being educated, being fed, and, uh, making the most out of their lives, with the theoretical risk on the backside, that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider."


That's 1.1 to 1.6 MILLION dead kids. This is considered an "acceptable tradeoff"

for pro life Republicans. Can you guess how many school aged children people

that say things like this have?
.............

one suggestion I saw was. Put 10 parents in a room and let them decide which of their 2 or 3 " might be a tradeoff " they would consider


here:
https://www.towleroad.com/2020/04/fo...-deaths-watch/

[sturg33]

Hannity: "Doctor Oz, help us."

Dr. Oz: "Well, at first, we need our mojo back. Let's start with things that are really critical to the nation where we think we might be able to go for it without getting into a lot of trouble. I tell ya, schools are a very appetizing opportunity. I just saw a nice piece in The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality. And, you know, any life is a life lost, but to get every child back into a school where they're safely being educated, being fed, and, uh, making the most out of their lives, with the theoretical risk on the backside, that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider."


That's 1.1 to 1.6 MILLION dead kids. This is considered an "acceptable tradeoff"

for pro life Republicans. Can you guess how many school aged children people

that say things like this have?
.............

one suggestion I saw was. Put 10 parents in a room and let them decide which of their 2 or 3 " might be a tradeoff " they would consider


here:
https://www.towleroad.com/2020/04/fo...-deaths-watch/

That is not how the math works.

Lol man yall are stupid and easy to manipulate

[thethe]

Hannity: "Doctor Oz, help us."

Dr. Oz: "Well, at first, we need our mojo back. Let's start with things that are really critical to the nation where we think we might be able to go for it without getting into a lot of trouble. I tell ya, schools are a very appetizing opportunity. I just saw a nice piece in The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality. And, you know, any life is a life lost, but to get every child back into a school where they're safely being educated, being fed, and, uh, making the most out of their lives, with the theoretical risk on the backside, that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider."


That's 1.1 to 1.6 MILLION dead kids. This is considered an "acceptable tradeoff"

for pro life Republicans. Can you guess how many school aged children people

that say things like this have?
.............

one suggestion I saw was. Put 10 parents in a room and let them decide which of their 2 or 3 " might be a tradeoff " they would consider


here:
https://www.towleroad.com/2020/04/fo...-deaths-watch/

You're too stupid to know this was wrong.

My God imagine how many people like you are out there. Terrifying.

[sturg33]

You're too stupid to know this was wrong.

My God imagine how many people like you are out there. Terrifying.

Never forget. That Bloomberg could have given every American $1 million and STILL had money leftover!!

Lol

[thethe]

Never forget. That Bloomberg could have given every American $1 million and STILL had money leftover!!

Lol

Mental illness and stupidy is strong with the left. Endless virtue signaling now appears to be a tactic used to mask how utterly brainless these people are.

[Metaphysicist]

Definitely bizarre how many people are reading him as saying 2-3% of kids. Clearly not what he is saying.

Now, what he is actually saying is still weird and problematic, but its... unhelpful to yell about something he isn't saying.

[57Brave]

I have re read and listened and, that is what he says:

" The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality "


Perhaps an istruction to read 5 or 6 other articles to parse his true meaning.

and this:

" ... making the most out of their lives, with the theoretical risk on the backside, that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider."

not sure how else to read what he said.

[thethe]

Oof

[Metaphysicist]

2-3% of total mortality does not mean 2-3% of children. Children aren't the ones dying, and the % isn't the whole US population.

He's saying that when you look at the numbers and the estimates of what mitigation strategies have what effect, the closing of schools is (supposably) having only a 2-3% change in the overall projections for all deaths. I.e., you still get 97-98% of the benefits of the suppression strategy by doing everything else, but opening schools up.

EDIT: At least, that's how it reads to me. He's a weirdo so he could ACTUALLY mean anything.

[sturg33]

I have re read and listened and, that is what he says:

" The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality "


Perhaps an istruction to read 5 or 6 other articles to parse his true meaning.

and this:

" ... making the most out of their lives, with the theoretical risk on the backside, that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider."

not sure how else to read what he said.

Ayeayeaye

[57Brave]

EDIT: At least, that's how it reads to me. He's a weirdo so he could ACTUALLY mean anything.

He said what he said

[thethe]

He said what he said

And he said nothing what you think he did but believe your idiot blue check mark leftists who have are not competent enough to do real work.

[sturg33]

He said what he said

Correct.

If you weren't so incredibly stupid, youd understand he is saying that opening schools would add 2-3% to our nationwide death counts. I.e., if we have 20,000 deaths, then we'd get an additional 500 deaths nationwide.

I understand math is tough. This equation is that our entire school system is operating for the price of 500 lives. That is what leaders need to balance.

Still waiting on Bloomberg to cut those $1m checks

[57Brave]

He said what he said.

So yeah, lets open the schools.
And the kids that do contact and carry can go home and infect, family and younger children.
.0002-.0003 percent of children is too high
And we can avoid this

Ever had "day care flu" ?
.............

I find the defense and qualifications of Dr Oz statement interesting.

[sturg33]

He said what he said.

So yeah, lets open the schools.
And the kids that do contact and carry can go home and infect, family and younger children.
.0002-.0003 percent of children is too high
And we can avoid this

Ever had "day care flu" ?

I....
I can't...

I dont get how you're not getting this.

Kids dont die from this illness

[57Brave]

oh really ?