Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Cost of Promoting Albies Now

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts

    Cost of Promoting Albies Now

    Despite many folks claiming the Braves would not continue rushing prospects to the MLB level, the Braves are predictably promoting Albies tonight. Let's take a look at what this will cost the Braves in terms of future control and surplus value (the currency MLB players are valued with).

    Albies is a potential star-level player, even better than Swanson. Davenport projects him to produce as follows from 2017-2022:

    2017 (20): .269 .329 .392 (.721 OPS), 2.6 WAR (0.8-0.9 WAR rest of season)
    2018 (21): .280 .340 .404 (.744 OPS), 26 SBs, 3.2 WAR
    2019 (22): .283 .344 .408 (.752 OPS), 27 SBs, 3.5 WAR
    2020 (23): .287 .351 .424 (.775 OPS), 25 SBs, 3.9 WAR
    2021 (24): .288 .358 .428 (.786 OPS), 25 SBs, 4.2 WAR
    2022 (25): .289 .355 .429 (.784 OPS), 23 SBs, 4.0 WAR

    We can safely project another couple ~4 WAR seasons in 2023/2024 when Albies is 26/27 years old and entering his peak years. His speed and defense will begin to decline at that age, but power tends to tick up to compensate.

    Promoting him now gives the Braves the following years of control and projected salaries (based off Dee Gordon's figures plus inflation):

    2017 (pre-arb): $0.2M
    2018 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2019 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2020 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2021 (arb 1): $3M
    2022 (arb 2): $5M
    2023 (arb 3): $9M

    Total: $18.7M
    WAR produced: 23.7
    Surplus value: $218.3M

    Waiting until 2 weeks into 2018 gives the Braves control of Albies through 2024, but he will be a Super 2 player. His projected salaries then become:

    2018 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2019 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2020 (pre-arb): $0.5M
    2021 (arb 1): $2M
    2022 (arb 2): $4M
    2023 (arb 3): $8M
    2024 (arb 4): $12M

    Total: $27.5M
    WAR produced: 26.8
    Surplus value: $240.5M

    Promoting Albies now is costing the Braves ~$22M in surplus value ($240.5M-$218.3M). Taking into account the worst possible errors in the projected salaries could drop the wasted value to the ~$20M range.

    But wait, what if they extend him? Extending him can happen in either scenario, and will provide the exact same amount of surplus value depending on the price they pay for the additional FA years. The ability to extend him in no way affects the surplus value calculation of this decision.

    This move gains the Braves 2 months of Albies' production this season when the Braves are on pace to win 75 games, plus 2 weeks of his production in 2018, at the cost of $20M+ in surplus value. We have seen the Braves make the same decision with Swanson they are currently making with Albies, and it shouldn't be surprising when they do the same thing with Acuna.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 08-01-2017 at 03:26 PM.

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    Garmel (08-01-2017), jpx7 (08-03-2017), Julio3000 (08-03-2017), Managuarantano's Volunteers (08-02-2017), sturg33 (08-04-2017), TURBO (08-01-2017)

  3. #2
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post

    This move gains the Braves 2 months of Albies' production this season when the Braves are on pace to win 75 games, plus 2 weeks of his production in 2018, at the cost of $20M+ in surplus value. We have seen the Braves make the same decision with Swanson they are currently making with Albies, and it shouldn't be surprising when they do the same thing with Acuna.
    We were told by some this wouldn't happen. It's obviously happening and going to continue to happen. Braves on pace to win 74 games now.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thewupk For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-03-2017), Julio3000 (08-03-2017)

  5. #3
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    gold standard franchise
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-03-2017)

  7. #4
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    gold standard franchise
    the best

  8. #5
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,484
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,792
    Thanked in
    2,710 Posts
    Enscheff, can you tell me what front office GMs promote all their top prospects using the service time loophole?
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  9. #6
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Enscheff, can you tell me what front office GMs promote all their top prospects using the service time loophole?
    Cubs, Rays are a couple who come to mind who have used it. The Astros in 2014 with George Spinger.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-03-2017)

  11. #7
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,484
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,792
    Thanked in
    2,710 Posts
    I just want to know what GMs Encheff would be happy with.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  12. #8
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Enscheff, can you tell me what front office GMs promote all their top prospects using the service time loophole?
    I'm not asking the Braves to promote all top prospects using service time loopholes. I'm asking them to promote players when it makes sense, taking into account service time (something they have openly stated they do not do). Trying to generate excitement because the FO failed to do anything during the trade deadline is not a good enough reason to waste $20M in surplus value.

    It made no sense to promote Albies now with BP producing adequately at 2B and the Braves out of contention. In this case, it makes all the sense in the world to promote Albies a couple weeks into next year, and gain the extra $20M in surplus value.

    It made no sense to promote Swanson on Aug 17 last year when he was posting mediocre numbers in AA, and the Braves were once again out of contention. Again, it would have made all the sense in the world to keep Swanson in AA for all of 2017, start him in AAA this year, then call him up as soon as a spot opened up.

    I'm assuming they are going to do the same thing with Acuna.

    Making this mistake once in a while is fine. Having Heyward on the opening day roster in 2011 was defensible because they were playoff contenders and needed every win they could get. They did the same thing with Freeman, but they were in contention then.

    Consistently making this same mistake is not fine. It shows a systemic misunderstanding of player value. It should be concerning to every fan.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 08-02-2017 at 10:51 AM.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-03-2017), sturg33 (08-04-2017)

  14. #9
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    291
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    752
    Thanked in
    530 Posts
    I feel like the old dinosaurs that run the team are rushing these prospects, so that they can try to go out on a winner within the next few years. They are sacrificing the very bright future to try to win now when this team likely won't be competing deep into the playoffs until 2019 or 2020 (with successful roster moves). This franchise will be better off without JS, Cox, and Hart.

  15. #10
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,484
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,792
    Thanked in
    2,710 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I'm not asking the Braves to promote all top prospects using service time loopholes. I'm asking them to promote players when it makes sense, taking into account service time (something they have openly stated they do not do). Trying to generate excitement because the FO failed to do anything during the trade deadline is not a good enough reason to waste $20M in surplus value.

    It made no sense to promote Albies now with BP producing adequately at 2B and the Braves out of contention. In this case, it makes all the sense in the world to promote Albies a couple weeks into next year, and gain the extra $20M in surplus value.

    It made no sense to promote Swanson on Aug 17 last year when he was posting mediocre numbers in AA, and the Braves were once again out of contention. Again, it would have made all the sense in the world to keep Swanson in AA for all of 2017, start him in AAA this year, then call him up as soon as a spot opened up.

    I'm assuming they are going to do the same thing with Acuna.

    Making this mistake once in a while is fine. Having Heyward on the opening day roster in 2011 was defensible because they were playoff contenders and needed every win they could get. They did the same thing with Freeman, but they were in contention then.

    Consistently making this same mistake is not fine. It shows a systemic misunderstanding of player value. It should be concerning to every fan.

    I am all for abusing the service time loophole like crazy but I dont see other teams abusing it like crazy either. Dont listen to what the Braves say publicly, they cant admit to doing it without risking grievances by the union. I think you could say we did save service time on him this year since a lot of people thought he would start the season with the Braves. I dont think he will be all that good his first year or two so we might be better off letting him figure things out in the majors now as opposed to when we have a better chance to compete. I also do believe in the theory that leaving a player at AAA too long can cause them to try too hard to impress the FO for a promotion.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  16. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    Just for personal clarification, why are the Braves paying Albies one million less in scenario 2 for each of 2021, 2022, and 2023?

  17. #12
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Cubs, Rays are a couple who come to mind who have used it. The Astros in 2014 with George Spinger.
    Dodgers did it this season with Cody Bellinger.

  18. #13
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Pretty much every smart organization does it now, even the ones who have plenty of money.

    And, oh, BTW Hart mentioned (according to Chip and Joe) that it would be difficult to bring Medlen up right now because the 40 man is full. I won't speculate on the value of Medlen at the ML level because I doubt there is any BUT the inflexibility now faced to make any move is directly related to the fact that Albies is up, on the 40 man, and didn't have to be.

    It will be interesting to hear all the crying this offseason if the Braves lose somebody to rule 5 claim because they don't have room to protect them.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Horsehide Harry For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (08-04-2017)

  20. #14
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    Pretty much every smart organization does it now, even the ones who have plenty of money.

    And, oh, BTW Hart mentioned (according to Chip and Joe) that it would be difficult to bring Medlen up right now because the 40 man is full. I won't speculate on the value of Medlen at the ML level because I doubt there is any BUT the inflexibility now faced to make any move is directly related to the fact that Albies is up, on the 40 man, and didn't have to be.

    It will be interesting to hear all the crying this offseason if the Braves lose somebody to rule 5 claim because they don't have room to protect them.
    Right now the Braves have the likes of Jason Hursh, Micah Johnson, Danny Santana, Lane Adams, Jace Peterson, Wisler, Blair, Krol, Enrique Burgos, Biddle, Lindgren, Rivero, Motte, Phillips etc on their 40 man. If they lose someone they want to the Rule 5 draft it won't be because they promoted Albies.

  21. #15
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Right now the Braves have the likes of Jason Hursh, Micah Johnson, Danny Santana, Lane Adams, Jace Peterson, Wisler, Blair, Krol, Enrique Burgos, Biddle, Lindgren, Rivero, Motte, Phillips etc on their 40 man. If they lose someone they want to the Rule 5 draft it won't be because they promoted Albies.
    It's not necessarily about who the Braves have on the 40 man right now. It's about flexibility. It's not the main reason Albies shouldn't be up but it's one of them.

  22. #16
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,096
    Thanked in
    5,758 Posts
    I seriously doubt anyone in this dumb FO is doing the analysis that Enscheff just did

  23. #17
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    I seriously doubt anyone in this dumb FO is doing the analysis that Enscheff just did
    lol

  24. #18
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,096
    Thanked in
    5,758 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk View Post
    lol
    If they are, then the FO is even dumber for ignoring the data

  25. #19
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    239 Posts
    I can't produce the rule that says why, but I think Albies had to be added to the 40 regardless this offseason because of how young he signed.

    And if I'm wrong, does it matter? Because if he wasn't gone in a trade he was always going to get put on the '18 OD roster since the Braves could give two rips about clock time.

  26. #20
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    If they are, then the FO is even dumber for ignoring the data
    Right . . .

    I mean, I think that this FO is, um, less than talented (never bought into the Coppolella hype, the Hart 'stable hand' nonsense, or the hiring of the FanGraphs blogger of the year) and I don't think the Braves should have called up Albies (although I do think he's capable of performing at the Major League level).

    But to assert that the 'data' (and I think that's a kind descriptor) available only supports one conclusion is static reasoning.

    For all we know the Braves calling up Albies could be a showcase. We have no clue how they view him long term.

    If they don't have a long term plan then I will stop being a Braves fan.
    Last edited by Hawk; 08-04-2017 at 11:37 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. The cost of poor lineup optimization
    By Enscheff in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-08-2017, 12:21 PM
  2. Albies
    By msstate7 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-23-2017, 05:45 AM
  3. Obamacare causes cost to go way up!!
    By AerchAngel in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-07-2016, 02:12 PM
  4. Rebuilding Afghanistan cost more than Europe after WW2
    By sturg33 in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-05-2014, 07:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •