Missed 1st AB, but 2 and 3 were groundersOriginally Posted by Enscheff
Missed 1st AB, but 2 and 3 were grounders
I understand it's Coors, but holy crap. This entire team needs to grow up, they're playing way below their level. Folty went from having a terrific year to being straight garbage in three games. He's too talented for this, get a grip.
Averaging 2 runs per game at Coors. This offense is good.
They did trade one of the better pieces the of rotation plus more. Much like the deadline trades in first year of rebuild it seems to have affected the team perhaps.
Psychology matters I think.
Either way no big deal. Trading pieces was right thing to do.
I don't understand this, but even when Kemp is sucking (which has been the norm of late), the offense still is much better with him in it. I know that doesn't make sense at all, but the offense is just horrid lately.
It really is looking like guys have started phoning it in.
FF up until kemp injury... .329/.430/.671
FF since kemp injury... .290/.389/.468
Ops difference of .244 #protection
Correlation is not causation
Extend Kemp!
Unless it supports what I am claiming!
Very similar to sample size in that regard.
The difference he makes in the offense is obvious. Not sure it improves the team though bc of the negative defense. I do know the braves are much more fun to watch when he's out there though. This offense is putrid without him
Keep in mind...I want Kemp gone tomorrow(by any means), but there is a real difference in the way this team plays on offense when he is in the lineup...bad hammy Kemp and especially good hammy Kemp.
Do you actually know how to prove causation by analyzing data? Just curious since you like to make claims like this, yet have displayed no real knowledge on the topic.
The offense was entirely different before Kemp hurt his hamstring. That injury was really limiting him at the plate. It's much easier to navigate this lineup without a healthy Kemp.
Fried's FA averaged 93.3 last night, almost exactly his 93.2 average the previous 2 games he pitched.
Didn't realize 0.1 was so insignificant. Guess FF (.320) and Swanson (.214) are hitting almost exactly the same... only ~ 0.1 difference.
Nevermind, don't wanna troll you today
Well, I think I might still have my textbook from Stat 101 from the fall of 1995 around somewhere. I remember having to look up numbers from the tables in the back. Had to use MACs for the projects which mean a fairly lengthy walk to the Mac computer lab. Irritating.
As I recall, I couldn't even get beer money from selling the book. Really beautiful girl with a lovely tan in that class though. go figure -- in stats class.
So since you have no idea what you're talking about, you should definitely keep piping up on related topics. Makes sense.
You're trying way too hard.
Enscheff don't start again.
Forever Fredi
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
