Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Braves players are lobbying to have Brian Snitker return

  1. #1
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    123
    Thanked in
    80 Posts

    Braves players are lobbying to have Brian Snitker return

    From earlier today with a tweet by Bob Nightengale embedded in the article...

    The plot thickens as Braves players, including one of their best, lobby the front office to bring back their embattled manager...

    https://www.talkingchop.com/2017/9/2...reddie-freeman

  2. #2
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,597
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    387
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,187
    Thanked in
    2,040 Posts
    Fans often complain about a manager's in game blunders because that's the only part of their job we see. We don't see 98% of their job which is done in the clubhouse.

    Being a good bench strategist is nice but it doesn't make you a good manager. You can be brilliant in game and be a terrible manager. Conversely, you can be terrible in game and still be a great manager.

    The fact that the players love Snitker and are willing to go to bat for him (no pun intended) is a strong endorsement. It's not everything as there are plenty of managers that are player friendly but unable to motivate their men.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    Super (09-26-2017)

  4. #3
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    9,509
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    877
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,109
    Thanked in
    820 Posts
    At some point, all of the motivation and player-friendliness in the world doesn't mean squat if it doesn't translate into wins. That is the situation in which Snitker finds himself at the end of his second season at the helm. Under any "bottom line" criteria, I don't know how he can realistically expect to keep his job regardless of how much his players like him.

  5. #4
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    37,263
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,293
    Thanked in
    3,675 Posts
    Meh, players shouldn't make these decisions. If we leave FF in charge, he's still at 3b

  6. #5
    The Artist Formally Known as

    Ventura's Stolen Bases


    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Managua, Nicaragua and Tennessee
    Posts
    1,439
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,582
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    308
    Thanked in
    213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Meh, players shouldn't make these decisions. If we leave FF in charge, he's still at 3b
    but then we wouldn't have any positional needs because we could play kemp at 1b and acuņa in lf

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    This stuff just baffles me.

    If Snit is loved by his players and they will play hard for him then that's a very good reason to keep him.

    So why not keep the manager the players love, and give him directives on how to manage the tactical portion of the game?

    There are like 10 scenarios that really matter each game. Things like which BP arm faces which parts of the lineup, the batting order, who to PH vs which opposing pitcher, when to sub defensively for Kemp, etc. Why not script out the 10 most impactful scenarios ahead of time and make Snit follow the script?

    It really isn't that complicated.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    cajunrevenge (09-26-2017), jpx7 (09-26-2017), mossy (09-26-2017)

  9. #7
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Of course the existing set of players will lobby for someone they know vs. someone who might toss everything up in the air.

    I'm with enscheff in that if Snitker comes back, he needs to be on a short leash. There are so few decisions in a game that matter, but those that do seem to matter a lot. Snitker comes up short in bullpen management and not replacing Kemp in games where we lead late is simply inexcusable.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-26-2017)

  11. #8
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,368
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,806
    Thanked in
    2,448 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    This stuff just baffles me.

    If Snit is loved by his players and they will play hard for him then that's a very good reason to keep him.

    So why not keep the manager the players love, and give him directives on how to manage the tactical portion of the game?

    There are like 10 scenarios that really matter each game. Things like which BP arm faces which parts of the lineup, the batting order, who to PH vs which opposing pitcher, when to sub defensively for Kemp, etc. Why not script out the 10 most impactful scenarios ahead of time and make Snit follow the script?

    It really isn't that complicated.
    You're describing the role of the bench coach. Unfortunately, there aren't many the caliber of Pat Corrales around.

  12. #9
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    This stuff just baffles me.

    If Snit is loved by his players and they will play hard for him then that's a very good reason to keep him.

    So why not keep the manager the players love, and give him directives on how to manage the tactical portion of the game?

    There are like 10 scenarios that really matter each game. Things like which BP arm faces which parts of the lineup, the batting order, who to PH vs which opposing pitcher, when to sub defensively for Kemp, etc. Why not script out the 10 most impactful scenarios ahead of time and make Snit follow the script?

    It really isn't that complicated.
    To your list I would add someone needs to go over the data with him on how the different relievers do with rest or no rest.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  13. #10
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,324
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    765
    Thanked in
    445 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    This stuff just baffles me.

    If Snit is loved by his players and they will play hard for him then that's a very good reason to keep him.

    So why not keep the manager the players love, and give him directives on how to manage the tactical portion of the game?

    There are like 10 scenarios that really matter each game. Things like which BP arm faces which parts of the lineup, the batting order, who to PH vs which opposing pitcher, when to sub defensively for Kemp, etc. Why not script out the 10 most impactful scenarios ahead of time and make Snit follow the script?

    It really isn't that complicated.
    I vaguely remember something from the Bill James Abstract back in the 80s that is along these lines. James suggested that an inexperienced manager should be forced to play a few hundred games of ABPA baseball or some other strategy-based baseball board game in order to learn how to handle a multitude of tactical decisions. Today you could put them on a computer and up the number of games to the thousands to accomplish the same thing.

  14. #11
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DirkPiggler View Post
    I vaguely remember something from the Bill James Abstract back in the 80s that is along these lines. James suggested that an inexperienced manager should be forced to play a few hundred games of ABPA baseball or some other strategy-based baseball board game in order to learn how to handle a multitude of tactical decisions. Today you could put them on a computer and up the number of games to the thousands to accomplish the same thing.
    What I find odd is that a guy who has been around baseball all his adult life and managed extensively in the minors still flinches in some obvious situations. The game isn't as complicated as some make it and one has to play with the cards they are dealt, but one still should play those cards--whatever they are--as skillfully as possible.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-26-2017), Managuarantano's Volunteers (09-26-2017), Super (09-26-2017)

  16. #12
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,597
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    387
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,187
    Thanked in
    2,040 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    This stuff just baffles me.

    If Snit is loved by his players and they will play hard for him then that's a very good reason to keep him.

    So why not keep the manager the players love, and give him directives on how to manage the tactical portion of the game?

    There are like 10 scenarios that really matter each game. Things like which BP arm faces which parts of the lineup, the batting order, who to PH vs which opposing pitcher, when to sub defensively for Kemp, etc. Why not script out the 10 most impactful scenarios ahead of time and make Snit follow the script?

    It really isn't that complicated.
    First, I don't think there's a manager in the game who would accept the front office giving him "game scripts." That's cutting the legs out from under the manager. Trying something like that is just asking for an ugly blowup between the clubhouse and the front office.

    Honestly, the game really isn't that complicated. The majority of a manager's in game decisions are fairly obvious. You bring in your LOOGY to get out the big left handed hitter late in the game. You put your set up man out there in the 8th. Etc. When those moves go well the manager gets no credit. When they blow up people are screaming at the manager.

    Too often a manager gets blamed when the real problem is with the roster. If you don't have the horses to get you to the playoffs then you can't blame the driver. The question is whether the manager is squeezing the most he can out of the team. If he's doing that then you can't complain.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    Knucksie (09-26-2017)

  18. #13
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    First, I don't think there's a manager in the game who would accept the front office giving him "game scripts." That's cutting the legs out from under the manager. Trying something like that is just asking for an ugly blowup between the clubhouse and the front office.

    Honestly, the game really isn't that complicated. The majority of a manager's in game decisions are fairly obvious. You bring in your LOOGY to get out the big left handed hitter late in the game. You put your set up man out there in the 8th. Etc. When those moves go well the manager gets no credit. When they blow up people are screaming at the manager.

    Too often a manager gets blamed when the real problem is with the roster. If you don't have the horses to get you to the playoffs then you can't blame the driver. The question is whether the manager is squeezing the most he can out of the team. If he's doing that then you can't complain.
    Can you honestly say the Snitker makes the right call in all of those "obvious" situations? Is it obvious that Kemp shouldn't be playing the outfield late in the game? Haven't there been a ton of obvious moments that he has mismanaged our bullpen?

    Honestly, a manager's impact on the game is probably minimal and you are right that most of a manager's decisions should be fairly simple. And if the players like playing for him then that is definitely a positive that needs to be taken into consideration. But if you are going to keep him, then you have to make him realize that his in-game management has been sub-optimal and that he has players with different needs. Don't bench Swanson if he is on the MLB club, either send him down or play him (this is also a FO thing). Get Kemp a defensive replacement late in the game. Don't keep sending a reliever out there in high leverage situations when he has been getting lit up every single time he takes the mound. Understand when a player's production is probably luck and when it is probably actual skill. Don't be afraid to look at stats outside of RBI, avg., and ERA.

    If they can work with Snitker a little on the way he approaches the game, I'm on board with keeping him for another year since the player's do seem to play hard for him. That is definitely an important element. Just try to get him to optimize the rest of his decisions.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to BeanieAntics For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-26-2017)

  20. #14
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Maybe this is just me, but i think there is an inconsistent message coming from upstairs and that is hamstringing Snitker a bit. There's no question that Snitker has earned the moniker "Game 7" in here because that is how he has managed for the most part (at least when it comes to the bullpen). Where I think there is a disconnect is that they bring in veterans to fill a few holes on the team with the supposed intent on making a big step forward in the W/L column. When that falls through, they start jacking around the roster and Snitker is kind of going on the fly both with the big furniture and the end tables). Last year was a lost season and I always thought this year would be a lost season as well. I guess the front office thought differently, but I still would have played through with everything that was brought in (except that fat b*st*rd Colon) instead of shaking things up they way they have with the early call-ups. I want to stress that this is just me.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    Jaw (09-26-2017), jpx7 (09-26-2017)

  22. #15
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    First, I don't think there's a manager in the game who would accept the front office giving him "game scripts." That's cutting the legs out from under the manager. Trying something like that is just asking for an ugly blowup between the clubhouse and the front office.

    Honestly, the game really isn't that complicated. The majority of a manager's in game decisions are fairly obvious. You bring in your LOOGY to get out the big left handed hitter late in the game. You put your set up man out there in the 8th. Etc. When those moves go well the manager gets no credit. When they blow up people are screaming at the manager.

    Too often a manager gets blamed when the real problem is with the roster. If you don't have the horses to get you to the playoffs then you can't blame the driver. The question is whether the manager is squeezing the most he can out of the team. If he's doing that then you can't complain.
    Then they need to find a manager who understands why the scripts are written as they are. The manager should have full buy-in, rather than the FO just handing down a list of commandments.

    Like you said, the game isn't overly complicated. Therefore, it is inexcusable for Snit (or any manager) to make so many incorrect moves. The article that spurred all this discussion only named the most egregious examples.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-26-2017)

  24. #16
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,635
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,773
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    148 Posts
    Hopefully next season will be a winning season whoever manages the team. It seems this year was a quasi-tank just to bring some of the prospects up to get some needed experience.

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to buck75 For This Useful Post:

    Hawk (09-27-2017)

  26. #17
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Mickey Callaway, pitching coach for the Indians, is another guy I would be interested as manager.

    Dave Martinez from the Cubs being the other.

Similar Threads

  1. Mark Bradley gets it; Re: Brian Snitker
    By WaitingFor2017 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-24-2017, 08:02 PM
  2. Heyman's thoughts on Brian Snitker
    By WaitingFor2017 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-04-2017, 01:41 PM
  3. Braves likely to bring Snitker back for 2018
    By WaitingFor2017 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-09-2017, 11:13 AM
  4. GDT: 9/30/'15 - Braves vs. Gnats , We welcome Brian Jordan to the discussion!
    By The Chosen One in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 216
    Last Post: 10-01-2015, 05:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •