Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: What's the best we could hope for in 2018?

  1. #1
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,096
    Thanked in
    5,758 Posts

    What's the best we could hope for in 2018?

    Just a thought experiment... how good could the team be as currently constructed, and thus what would we need to do to get to 90 wins?

    Here are what I think are attainable WAR totals next year (not necessarily likely, but possible).

    Position - WAR (2017 WAR)
    C - Flowers/Suzuki: 4 fWAR (4.7)
    1B - Freeman: 6 (5.5)
    2B - Albies: 4.5 (3.3)
    3B - Ruiz/Camargo: 2 (0.4)
    SS - Swanson: 2.5 (1.3)
    LF - Adams/Markakis: 2 (-1.5)
    CF - Ender: 3.5 (3)
    RF - Acuna: 2.5 (0.8)

    Total: 27 (17.5)


    Improvement: ~9.5 WINS


    Teheran: 2 (1.1)
    Dickey: 1.5 (1.7)
    Folty: 2 (1.8)
    Newcomb: 2 (PACING 2.3)
    Gohara: 3.5 (PACING 6)

    Total: 11

    Braves starting pitchers in 2017 = 8.2

    Improvement: ~2.8 WINS


    Not going to look at bench bullpen... but I project we could improve by ~1.5 WINS just with the bullpen additions of Winkler, Minter, etc.

    So by my math, by simply dumping Kemp, our current roster stands to improve year over year by ~13-14 WINS.

    This is assuming no regression... but it's not assuming wild predictions either.

    So where does that leave us? Anywhere between 84-86 wins.


    What do we need to get to 90? Where can we realistically improve?

    We could probably pick up an extra win or two in the rotation by replacing Dickey with a Lance Lynn type.

    We could potentially pick up a win by picking up a Todd Frazier at third.

    We could potentially pick up a win by picking up a better player in left field.

    If we did all of that, we get to the 88-90 range.

    Is my math off here?

  2. #2
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,579
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    Primarily organic growth for now IMO.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to thethe For This Useful Post:

    Knucksie (09-30-2017)

  4. #3
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,569
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    You lost me at WAR.

    Best outcomes for 2018 include a new front office and less fanboy sunshine blowing posters.

  5. #4
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    swamps of S. Ga
    Posts
    4,197
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,121
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    572
    Thanked in
    399 Posts
    Start pitchers progression upwards by firing Hernandez.

    Dickey won't be around. He's gonna retire. I don't see that much of an improvement in Folty. He lost last 7 starts, to get those numbers he'd have to be a Cy Young candidate compared to this year. In those starts he went 4.0, 6.0, 6.1, 5.0, 5.2, 3.1, 2.2 IP. Threw 154.0 innings in 28 starts and 1 relief appearance.
    Last edited by salmagundy; 09-29-2017 at 09:48 PM.

  6. #5
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    239 Posts
    My hope is that Chuck Hernandez is fired, all of the old school guys in the FO are shown the door, and Kemp's contract somehow gets eaten.

    In the organization:

    C: Flowers/Suzuki (4 fWAR)
    1B: Freeman (6 fWAR)
    2B: Albies (4.5 fWAR)
    3B: Ruiz/Camargo (1.5 fWAR)
    SS: Swanson (2 fWAR)
    LF: Some combo of Markakis/Adams (2 fWAR)
    RF: Acuna (3.5 fWAR) (I'd hope the Braves FO is smart, but...if not, this might be a touch conservative)

    Starting rotation I really can't do until I see what's projected.
    Aggression with prospects is fine, but being stupid is not. There should be a way to find a happy medium between a Pirates like idea of being overly cautious with prospects and going stupidly fast with prospects.

  7. #6
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    We're at about 80 wins on the expected win curve. With some non-outlandish luck we can get to 85.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  8. #7
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    505
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    17
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    162
    Thanked in
    102 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Just a thought experiment... how good could the team be as currently constructed, and thus what would we need to do to get to 90 wins?

    Here are what I think are attainable WAR totals next year (not necessarily likely, but possible).

    Position - WAR (2017 WAR)
    C - Flowers/Suzuki: 4 fWAR (4.7)
    1B - Freeman: 6 (5.5)
    2B - Albies: 4.5 (3.3)
    3B - Ruiz/Camargo: 2 (0.4)
    SS - Swanson: 2.5 (1.3)
    LF - Adams/Markakis: 2 (-1.5)
    CF - Ender: 3.5 (3)
    RF - Acuna: 2.5 (0.8)

    Total: 27 (17.5)


    Improvement: ~9.5 WINS


    Teheran: 2 (1.1)
    Dickey: 1.5 (1.7)
    Folty: 2 (1.8)
    Newcomb: 2 (PACING 2.3)
    Gohara: 3.5 (PACING 6)

    Total: 11

    Braves starting pitchers in 2017 = 8.2

    Improvement: ~2.8 WINS


    Not going to look at bench bullpen... but I project we could improve by ~1.5 WINS just with the bullpen additions of Winkler, Minter, etc.

    So by my math, by simply dumping Kemp, our current roster stands to improve year over year by ~13-14 WINS.

    This is assuming no regression... but it's not assuming wild predictions either.

    So where does that leave us? Anywhere between 84-86 wins.


    What do we need to get to 90? Where can we realistically improve?

    We could probably pick up an extra win or two in the rotation by replacing Dickey with a Lance Lynn type.

    We could potentially pick up a win by picking up a Todd Frazier at third.

    We could potentially pick up a win by picking up a better player in left field.

    If we did all of that, we get to the 88-90 range.

    Is my math off here?
    I wonder if any Twins fans did a similar exercise last year?

  9. #8
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    101
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    137 Posts
    I don't think there's really any possible way to rid ourselves of Kemp's contract so I fee we'll have his horrible defense clogging up one of the corner spots all year. I think Markakis will regress to a negative WAR player next season. So even if we platoon the 2 wastes of space it will still lead to negative wins.

    With those 2 I just can't see us getting near 90 wins. 80 could be doable if Acuna performs like we are hoping (after a May call up).

  10. #9
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,679
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    Instead of trading pitching for pitching I'd look at a young super cheap outfielder like Frazier or Tucker to trade for. Having 2 young cheap corner outfielders like Acuna and Tucker/Frazier would allow you to just eat Kemps money and cut him.

  11. #10
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,257
    Thanked in
    1,831 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    Instead of trading pitching for pitching I'd look at a young super cheap outfielder like Frazier or Tucker to trade for. Having 2 young cheap corner outfielders like Acuna and Tucker/Frazier would allow you to just eat Kemps money and cut him.
    I dont get the rumors of trading for a pitcher when we have guys like Gohara, Newk, Folty, Julio, Fried, and Allard, Soroka, among others coming up. Just doesnt make any sense.

    I agree on trading for an outfielder but it depends on the cost.

  12. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,679
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    I dont get the rumors of trading for a pitcher when we have guys like Gohara, Newk, Folty, Julio, Fried, and Allard, Soroka, among others coming up. Just doesnt make any sense.

    I agree on trading for an outfielder but it depends on the cost.
    Me either. We won't have enough spots as it is.

  13. #12
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hudson2 View Post
    Me either. We won't have enough spots as it is.
    Yes I agree, and on top of that...what pitcher is even out there to acquire ?? Acher (no matter how good his stuff is), was VERY average again this year. I’d just as well keep Julio. If there was a Sale type out there....there isn’t. Let’s not for get late next year about Wright and maybe even Weigel. Just let the guys that earn the spot pitch. The biggest problem are those corner spots and maybe a short term answer at third. Realistically , we are even “ok” there with Camargo. I’m afraid the front office (under pressure to win), will make some moves for publicity right when everything is starting to click into place. They just need patience and by 2019(possibly even next year with a few breaks)...this team should be playing in October.

  14. #13
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsnores View Post
    I wonder if any Twins fans did a similar exercise last year?
    Big difference with the Twins is that they had a slew of good-to-very good prospects (Buxton, Sano, Rosario, Kepler, Vargas, Polanco, Berrios) that had recently graduated to the major leagues. I'm probably one of the few people in America who isn't all that surprised by their being in the playoffs. Their pitching is really shaky after Santana and Berrios, but their young core of position prospects is pretty solid. We simply don't have a cadre of young veterans like the Twins. I expect our younger guys to be up-and-down next year the same way the Twins' guys were last year and the year before.

    I think we can be a .500 team next year if everything falls right.
    Last edited by 50PoundHead; 09-30-2017 at 01:09 PM.

  15. #14
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,569
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    Big difference with the Twins is that they had a slew of good-to-very good prospects (Buxton, Sano, Rosario, Kepler, Vargas, Polanco, Berrios) that had recently graduated to the major leagues. I'm probably one of the few people in America who isn't all that surprised by their being in the playoffs. Their pitching is really shaky after Santana and Berrios, but their young core of position prospects is pretty solid. We simply don't have a cadre of young veterans like the Twins. I expect our younger guys to be up-and-down next year the same way the Twins' guys were last year and the year before.

    I think we can be a .500 team next year if everything falls right.

    Roasario was on a tear the last two months or so. Buxton was red hot too for awhile and he actually carried them for a bit. Personally I think this is a fluke and they come crashing back to earth next year. They are better than last year, but not 25 games better. Berrios was up and down, mostly down on the road. Think they need to add a legit 2/3 starter to have any chance of hanging around next season.

  16. #15
    It's OVER 5,000! CrimsonCowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Outskirts Of Mobile, Alabama. Roll Tide!!!
    Posts
    14,086
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,288
    Thanked in
    2,775 Posts
    Answer to the original question is rather generic: we don't know right now

    We have to see what happens in the offseason. What will the rotation look like? Who's in the bullpen? Who's on third? Markakis traded? Kemp (not likely)? What about the coaching staff? There's a lot of questions that will have to be answered between After tomorrow's game and when Spring Training opens in February
    Chopping With The Braves And Rolling With The Tide

  17. #16
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,096
    Thanked in
    5,758 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonCowboy View Post
    Answer to the original question is rather generic: we don't know right now

    We have to see what happens in the offseason. What will the rotation look like? Who's in the bullpen? Who's on third? Markakis traded? Kemp (not likely)? What about the coaching staff? There's a lot of questions that will have to be answered between After tomorrow's game and when Spring Training opens in February
    The original question was what's the best we can hope for with no changes externally... I peg that at 83-85 wins

  18. #17
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    The original question was what's the best we can hope for with no changes externally... I peg that at 83-85 wins
    That's about right. I think we are at 80, and with some reasonable luck could push it up to 85.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  19. #18
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Most of these posts are exactly the same as they have been the last few offseasons. Even the conservative 75-78 win projections proved to be too homer.

    If they don't make additions they can expect the same 3-5 win improvement they saw last year. That makes the Braves a 75-78 win team.

    If they fix 3b, fix the 3rd OF position, and acquire a 3 win SP they can be a .500 team with a chance at being buyers at the deadline. Problem is there doesn't appear to be any money to make any improvements other than a few BP additions.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 09-30-2017 at 05:04 PM.

  20. #19
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    9,509
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    877
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,109
    Thanked in
    820 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Most of the law posts are exactly the same as they have been the last few offseasons. Even the conservative 75-78 win projections proved to be too homer.

    If they don't make additions they can expect the same 3-5 win improvement they saw last year. That makes the Braves a 75-78 win team.

    If they fix 3b, fix the 3rd OF position, and acquire a 3 win SP they can be a .500 team with a chance at being buyers at the deadline. Problem is there doesn't appear to be any money to make any improvements other than a few BP additions.
    This is the undeniable truth. Until this team picks up another solid starter, a 3B, and a serious upgrade in LF, (not to mention manager) we'll be stuck in the purgatory of 90 loss teams. I got sucked in this year thinking we'd approach 80 wins. We aren't close and won't be until those things happen.
    Last edited by USMA76; 09-30-2017 at 04:39 PM.

  21. #20
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NinersSBChamps View Post
    Roasario was on a tear the last two months or so. Buxton was red hot too for awhile and he actually carried them for a bit. Personally I think this is a fluke and they come crashing back to earth next year. They are better than last year, but not 25 games better. Berrios was up and down, mostly down on the road. Think they need to add a legit 2/3 starter to have any chance of hanging around next season.
    Their pitching is very thin (note Colon in the rotation), but I think Rosario is for real. Buxton has really shortened his swing and isn't getting killed by breaking stuff anymore. He still has holes in his swing and I don't think he'll ever be a top-tier offensive player, but he doesn't have to be with the rest of that line-up. Polanco is the guy who probably tails off.

Similar Threads

  1. What's Wrong with Julio? (A Glimmer of Hope)
    By Enscheff in forum Extented Spring Training
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 03-29-2019, 10:47 PM
  2. Hope you Floridians, Alabamans, and Georgians are doing alright
    By 50PoundHead in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-13-2018, 12:35 PM
  3. Payroll and hope...
    By TheBravos in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 05-16-2017, 01:42 PM
  4. The Hope Above All Hope
    By clvclv in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 12-06-2015, 12:02 AM
  5. Positive Stories that Give Hope for 'Murica Thread
    By The Chosen One in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 01-07-2014, 11:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •